H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Lleyton Hewitt vs Jan-Michael Gambill H2H: 4-3

Lleyton Hewitt holds a 4–3 lead over Jan-Michael Gambill in their ATP head-to-head. Across 7 main-draw meetings, Lleyton Hewitt leads 4–2 on hard courts, while Jan-Michael Gambill leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Lleyton Hewitt won the 2002 Miami Masters third round 3-6 6-4 7-5.

AUS Age 45 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
4 3
7 main draw meetings
USA Age 49 Right-Handed 190 cm / 6'3"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Mar 21, 2002* Miami Masters Masters 1000 R32 Hard Lleyton Hewitt #1 3-6 6-4 7-5 Jan-Michael Gambill #29 Match data
Mar 16, 2002* Indian Wells Masters Masters 1000 R16 Hard Lleyton Hewitt #1 6-2 6-4 Jan-Michael Gambill #27 Match data
Mar 2, 2002* San Jose ATP 250 SF Hard Lleyton Hewitt #1 7-5 6-4 Jan-Michael Gambill #22 Match data
Mar 25, 2001* Miami Masters Masters 1000 SF Hard Jan-Michael Gambill #19 7-5 6-4 Lleyton Hewitt #7 Match data
Jun 28, 2000* Wimbledon Grand Slam R128 Grass Jan-Michael Gambill #56 6-3 6-2 7-5 Lleyton Hewitt #7 Match data
Mar 26, 2000* Miami Masters Masters 1000 QF Hard Lleyton Hewitt #14 6-4 7-6(3) Jan-Michael Gambill #86 Match data
Mar 7, 1999* Scottsdale ATP 250 F Hard Jan-Michael Gambill #45 7-6(2) 4-6 6-4 Lleyton Hewitt #91 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Lleyton Hewitt #636 #1 5,205 2,159 564 241 70.1% 2 2 2 1 23 30
Jan-Michael Gambill #1,352 #14 1,655 1,956 201 191 51.3% 0 0 0 0 3 3

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Lleyton Hewitt Jan-Michael Gambill
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1997 0–1 0.0% #550 1,492 0 0
17 1998 10–9 52.6% #100 1,614 0 1
18 1999 40–18 69.0% #25 1,853 0 2 1995 0–1 0.0% #555 1,487 0 0
19 2000 53–15 77.9% #7 1,993 0 6
20 2001 71–15 82.6% #1 2,116 1 12 1997 3–5 37.5% #186 1,520 0 0
21 2002 61–16 79.2% #1 2,062 2 17 1998 31–23 57.4% #38 1,764 0 0
22 2003 29–10 74.4% #17 1,939 2 19 1999 25–25 50.0% #58 1,764 0 1
23 2004 64–16 80.0% #3 2,076 2 23 2000 33–26 55.9% #33 1,804 0 1
24 2005 36–9 80.0% #4 2,092 2 24 2001 35–22 61.4% #21 1,745 0 2
25 2006 32–14 69.6% #20 1,964 2 25 2002 28–26 51.9% #42 1,755 0 2
26 2007 34–15 69.4% #21 1,925 2 26 2003 22–25 46.8% #51 1,642 0 3
27 2008 17–10 63.0% #67 1,936 2 26 2004 18–25 41.9% #95 1,595 0 3
28 2009 33–19 63.5% #22 1,956 2 27 2005 5–10 33.3% #191 1,557 0 3
29 2010 18–11 62.1% #54 1,907 2 28 2006 1–1 50.0% #687 1,567 0 3
30 2011 8–9 47.1% #186 1,817 2 28 2007 0–2 0.0% #1107 1,503 0 3
31 2012 13–11 54.2% #83 1,867 2 28
32 2013 22–18 55.0% #60 1,884 2 28
33 2014 19–15 55.9% #50 1,841 2 30
34 2015 3–9 25.0% #307 1,715 2 30
35 2016 1–1 50.0% #633 1,727 2 30