H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 01:16 UTC

Lleyton Hewitt vs Jason Stoltenberg H2H: 4-1

Lleyton Hewitt holds a 4–1 lead over Jason Stoltenberg in their ATP head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Lleyton Hewitt leads 4–0 on hard courts, while Jason Stoltenberg leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Lleyton Hewitt won the 2000 Sydney final 6-4 6-0.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Lleyton Hewitt
AUS Age 45 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
4 – 1
5 main draw meetings
Jason Stoltenberg
AUS Age 56 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jan 16, 2000* Sydney ATP 250 F Hard Lleyton Hewitt #21 6-4 6-0 Jason Stoltenberg #94 Match data
Jan 8, 2000* Adelaide ATP 250 QF Hard Lleyton Hewitt #25 6-2 6-2 Jason Stoltenberg #80 Match data
Jan 9, 1999* Adelaide ATP 250 SF Hard Lleyton Hewitt #100 6-1 6-3 Jason Stoltenberg #27 Match data
Jul 10, 1998* Newport ATP 250 R16 Grass Jason Stoltenberg #35 6-1 6-3 Lleyton Hewitt #162 Match data
Jan 11, 1998* Adelaide ATP 250 F Hard Lleyton Hewitt #550 3-6 6-3 7-6(4) Jason Stoltenberg #79 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Lleyton Hewitt #636 #1 5,205 2,159 564 241 70.1% 2 2 2 1 23 30
Jason Stoltenberg #556 #19 1,299 1,923 294 259 53.2% 0 0 0 0 4 4

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Lleyton Hewitt Jason Stoltenberg
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1997 0–1 0.0% #550 1,492 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 1998 10–9 52.6% #100 1,614 0 1 1987 1–4 20.0% #413 1,470 0 0
18 1999 40–18 69.0% #25 1,853 0 2 1988 13–11 54.2% #70 1,640 0 0
19 2000 53–15 77.9% #7 1,993 0 6 1989 20–18 52.6% #84 1,692 0 0
20 2001 71–15 82.6% #1 2,116 1 12 1990 17–19 47.2% #108 1,679 0 0
21 2002 61–16 79.2% #1 2,062 2 17 1991 20–20 50.0% #75 1,716 0 0
22 2003 29–10 74.4% #17 1,939 2 19 1992 10–16 38.5% #168 1,621 0 0
23 2004 64–16 80.0% #3 2,076 2 23 1993 23–21 52.3% #44 1,694 0 1
24 2005 36–9 80.0% #4 2,092 2 24 1994 38–25 60.3% #21 1,772 0 2
25 2006 32–14 69.6% #20 1,964 2 25 1995 21–23 47.7% #80 1,736 0 2
26 2007 34–15 69.4% #21 1,925 2 26 1996 32–25 56.1% #31 1,767 0 3
27 2008 17–10 63.0% #67 1,936 2 26 1997 21–15 58.3% #79 1,768 0 4
28 2009 33–19 63.5% #22 1,956 2 27 1998 32–23 58.2% #27 1,789 0 4
29 2010 18–11 62.1% #54 1,907 2 28 1999 18–18 50.0% #80 1,715 0 4
30 2011 8–9 47.1% #186 1,817 2 28 2000 21–14 60.0% #66 1,689 0 4
31 2012 13–11 54.2% #83 1,867 2 28 2001 7–7 50.0% #185 1,681 0 4
32 2013 22–18 55.0% #60 1,884 2 28 — — — — — — —
33 2014 19–15 55.9% #50 1,841 2 30 — — — — — — —
34 2015 3–9 25.0% #307 1,715 2 30 — — — — — — —
35 2016 1–1 50.0% #633 1,727 2 30 — — — — — — —