H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 13:16 UTC

Lleyton Hewitt vs Jeff Tarango H2H: 1-0

Lleyton Hewitt holds a 1–0 lead over Jeff Tarango in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Lleyton Hewitt leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Lleyton Hewitt won the 2000 Roland Garros first round 7-6(5) 7-6(3) 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Lleyton Hewitt
AUS Age 45 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main draw meetings
Jeff Tarango
USA Age 57 Left-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
May 31, 2000* Roland Garros Grand Slam R128 Clay Lleyton Hewitt #9 7-6(5) 7-6(3) 6-3 Jeff Tarango #58 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Lleyton Hewitt #636 #1 5,205 2,159 564 241 70.1% 2 2 2 1 23 30
Jeff Tarango #1,001 #42 877 1,787 239 293 44.9% 0 0 0 0 2 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Lleyton Hewitt Jeff Tarango
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1997 0–1 0.0% #550 1,492 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 1998 10–9 52.6% #100 1,614 0 1 — — — — — — —
18 1999 40–18 69.0% #25 1,853 0 2 1987 1–2 33.3% #377 1,507 0 0
19 2000 53–15 77.9% #7 1,993 0 6 1988 7–6 53.8% #96 1,598 0 0
20 2001 71–15 82.6% #1 2,116 1 12 1989 10–11 47.6% #137 1,647 0 0
21 2002 61–16 79.2% #1 2,062 2 17 1990 11–17 39.3% #131 1,606 0 0
22 2003 29–10 74.4% #17 1,939 2 19 1991 16–23 41.0% #106 1,612 0 0
23 2004 64–16 80.0% #3 2,076 2 23 1992 28–24 53.8% #45 1,694 0 2
24 2005 36–9 80.0% #4 2,092 2 24 1993 24–26 48.0% #91 1,670 0 2
25 2006 32–14 69.6% #20 1,964 2 25 1994 23–27 46.0% #78 1,654 0 2
26 2007 34–15 69.4% #21 1,925 2 26 1995 18–24 42.9% #76 1,661 0 2
27 2008 17–10 63.0% #67 1,936 2 26 1996 14–18 43.8% #106 1,620 0 2
28 2009 33–19 63.5% #22 1,956 2 27 1997 31–29 51.7% #49 1,692 0 2
29 2010 18–11 62.1% #54 1,907 2 28 1998 24–29 45.3% #73 1,660 0 2
30 2011 8–9 47.1% #186 1,817 2 28 1999 21–24 46.7% #55 1,685 0 2
31 2012 13–11 54.2% #83 1,867 2 28 2000 10–24 29.4% #112 1,515 0 2
32 2013 22–18 55.0% #60 1,884 2 28 2001 1–8 11.1% #323 1,452 0 2
33 2014 19–15 55.9% #50 1,841 2 30 2002 0–1 0.0% #730 1,446 0 2
34 2015 3–9 25.0% #307 1,715 2 30 — — — — — — —
35 2016 1–1 50.0% #633 1,727 2 30 — — — — — — —