H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC

Lleyton Hewitt vs Juan Ignacio Chela H2H: 5-3

Lleyton Hewitt holds a 5–3 lead over Juan Ignacio Chela in their ATP head-to-head. Across 8 main-draw meetings, Lleyton Hewitt leads 4–2 on hard courts, while they are tied 1–1 on clay. Most recently, Juan Ignacio Chela won the 2010 Houston quarterfinal 6-4 6-3.

AUS Age 45 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
5 3
8 main draw meetings
ARG Age 46 Right-Handed 190 cm / 6'3"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Apr 10, 2010* Houston ATP 250 QF Clay Juan Ignacio Chela #82 6-4 6-3 Lleyton Hewitt #27 Match data
Sep 3, 2009* US Open Grand Slam R64 Hard Lleyton Hewitt #32 6-3 6-3 6-4 Juan Ignacio Chela #137 Match data
May 17, 2007* Hamburg Masters Masters 1000 R32 Clay Lleyton Hewitt #21 6-2 7-6(3) Juan Ignacio Chela #22 Match data
Aug 9, 2006* Canada Masters Masters 1000 R64 Hard Lleyton Hewitt #12 3-6 6-2 7-5 Juan Ignacio Chela #35 Match data
Jan 20, 2006* Australian Open Grand Slam R64 Hard Juan Ignacio Chela #51 6-4 6-4 6-7(8) 6-2 Lleyton Hewitt #6 Match data
Jan 23, 2005* Australian Open Grand Slam R32 Hard Lleyton Hewitt #3 6-2 4-6 6-1 6-4 Juan Ignacio Chela #24 Match data
Aug 28, 2004* Long Island ATP 250 QF Hard Lleyton Hewitt #5 6-7(6) 6-1 6-1 Juan Ignacio Chela #18 Match data
Mar 11, 2004* Indian Wells Masters Masters 1000 R32 Hard Juan Ignacio Chela #34 6-3 4-6 6-1 Lleyton Hewitt #9 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Lleyton Hewitt #636 #1 5,205 2,159 564 241 70.1% 2 2 2 1 23 30
Juan Ignacio Chela #967 #15 1,510 1,909 306 268 53.3% 0 0 0 1 5 6

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Lleyton Hewitt Juan Ignacio Chela
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1997 0–1 0.0% #550 1,492 0 0
17 1998 10–9 52.6% #100 1,614 0 1
18 1999 40–18 69.0% #25 1,853 0 2
19 2000 53–15 77.9% #7 1,993 0 6 1999 0–3 0.0% #124 1,463 0 0
20 2001 71–15 82.6% #1 2,116 1 12 2000 13–15 46.4% #63 1,540 0 1
21 2002 61–16 79.2% #1 2,062 2 17 2001 10–10 50.0% #70 1,594 0 1
22 2003 29–10 74.4% #17 1,939 2 19 2002 44–27 62.0% #23 1,783 0 2
23 2004 64–16 80.0% #3 2,076 2 23 2003 35–27 56.5% #38 1,762 0 2
24 2005 36–9 80.0% #4 2,092 2 24 2004 33–25 56.9% #26 1,735 0 3
25 2006 32–14 69.6% #20 1,964 2 25 2005 28–26 51.9% #39 1,691 0 3
26 2007 34–15 69.4% #21 1,925 2 26 2006 27–26 50.9% #33 1,721 0 3
27 2008 17–10 63.0% #67 1,936 2 26 2007 39–23 62.9% #20 1,796 0 4
28 2009 33–19 63.5% #22 1,956 2 27 2008 11–12 47.8% #140 1,737 0 4
29 2010 18–11 62.1% #54 1,907 2 28 2009 9–14 39.1% #73 1,731 0 4
30 2011 8–9 47.1% #186 1,817 2 28 2010 28–24 53.8% #38 1,835 0 6
31 2012 13–11 54.2% #83 1,867 2 28 2011 24–24 50.0% #29 1,737 0 6
32 2013 22–18 55.0% #60 1,884 2 28 2012 5–12 29.4% #176 1,634 0 6
33 2014 19–15 55.9% #50 1,841 2 30
34 2015 3–9 25.0% #307 1,715 2 30
35 2016 1–1 50.0% #633 1,727 2 30