H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 01:16 UTC

Lleyton Hewitt vs Julien Benneteau H2H: 2-2

Lleyton Hewitt and Julien Benneteau are tied 2–2 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Julien Benneteau leads 2–1 on hard courts, while Lleyton Hewitt leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Julien Benneteau won the 2014 Canada Masters second round 6-1 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Lleyton Hewitt
AUS Age 45 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
2 – 2
4 main draw meetings
Julien Benneteau
FRA Age 44 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Aug 6, 2014* Canada Masters Masters 1000 R64 Hard Julien Benneteau #47 6-1 6-2 Lleyton Hewitt #42 Match data
Jan 15, 2009* Sydney ATP 250 R32 Hard Lleyton Hewitt #74 5-7 6-2 6-4 Julien Benneteau #48 Match data
Mar 7, 2008* Las Vegas ATP 250 R16 Hard Julien Benneteau #61 6-3 7-5 Lleyton Hewitt #24 Match data
Apr 21, 2004* Monte Carlo Masters Masters 1000 R64 Clay Lleyton Hewitt #19 3-6 6-3 6-4 Julien Benneteau #113 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Lleyton Hewitt #636 #1 5,205 2,159 564 241 70.1% 2 2 2 1 23 30
Julien Benneteau #140 #25 1,608 1,955 269 292 48.0% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Lleyton Hewitt Julien Benneteau
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1997 0–1 0.0% #550 1,492 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 1998 10–9 52.6% #100 1,614 0 1 — — — — — — —
18 1999 40–18 69.0% #25 1,853 0 2 — — — — — — —
19 2000 53–15 77.9% #7 1,993 0 6 2001 1–1 50.0% #271 1,495 0 0
20 2001 71–15 82.6% #1 2,116 1 12 2002 0–2 0.0% #253 1,452 0 0
21 2002 61–16 79.2% #1 2,062 2 17 2003 3–7 30.0% #138 1,547 0 0
22 2003 29–10 74.4% #17 1,939 2 19 2004 14–15 48.3% #65 1,637 0 0
23 2004 64–16 80.0% #3 2,076 2 23 2005 5–18 21.7% #165 1,533 0 0
24 2005 36–9 80.0% #4 2,092 2 24 2006 24–22 52.2% #40 1,706 0 0
25 2006 32–14 69.6% #20 1,964 2 25 2007 22–28 44.0% #68 1,672 0 0
26 2007 34–15 69.4% #21 1,925 2 26 2008 22–20 52.4% #43 1,786 0 0
27 2008 17–10 63.0% #67 1,936 2 26 2009 26–28 48.1% #46 1,793 0 0
28 2009 33–19 63.5% #22 1,956 2 27 2010 24–19 55.8% #44 1,853 0 0
29 2010 18–11 62.1% #54 1,907 2 28 2011 21–21 50.0% #52 1,871 0 0
30 2011 8–9 47.1% #186 1,817 2 28 2012 26–21 55.3% #35 1,874 0 0
31 2012 13–11 54.2% #83 1,867 2 28 2013 27–25 51.9% #35 1,861 0 0
32 2013 22–18 55.0% #60 1,884 2 28 2014 25–22 53.2% #25 1,895 0 0
33 2014 19–15 55.9% #50 1,841 2 30 2015 1–5 16.7% #527 1,801 0 0
34 2015 3–9 25.0% #307 1,715 2 30 2016 7–14 33.3% #130 1,807 0 0
35 2016 1–1 50.0% #633 1,727 2 30 2017 13–13 50.0% #56 1,862 0 0
36 — — — — — — — 2018 8–11 42.1% #140 1,806 0 0