H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 13:16 UTC

Lleyton Hewitt vs Justin Gimelstob H2H: 3-1

Lleyton Hewitt holds a 3–1 lead over Justin Gimelstob in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts, while Lleyton Hewitt leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Lleyton Hewitt won the 2005 Bangkok fourth round 6-4 5-7 7-6(9).

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Lleyton Hewitt
AUS Age 45 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
3 – 1
4 main draw meetings
Justin Gimelstob
USA Age 49 Right-Handed 196 cm / 6'5"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Sep 30, 2005* Bangkok ATP 250 R16 Hard Lleyton Hewitt #5 6-4 5-7 7-6(9) Justin Gimelstob #108 Match data
Jun 26, 2005* Wimbledon Grand Slam R32 Grass Lleyton Hewitt #2 7-6(5) 6-4 7-5 Justin Gimelstob #123 Match data
Oct 16, 1998* Singapore ATP 250 R16 Carpet Lleyton Hewitt #137 6-7(6) 6-2 7-6(4) Justin Gimelstob #111 Match data
Jul 22, 1998* Washington ATP 250 R64 Hard Justin Gimelstob #101 6-3 2-6 6-2 Lleyton Hewitt #157 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Lleyton Hewitt #636 #1 5,205 2,159 564 241 70.1% 2 2 2 1 23 30
Justin Gimelstob #841 #63 733 1,721 107 171 38.5% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Lleyton Hewitt Justin Gimelstob
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1997 0–1 0.0% #550 1,492 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 1998 10–9 52.6% #100 1,614 0 1 — — — — — — —
18 1999 40–18 69.0% #25 1,853 0 2 1995 1–1 50.0% #576 1,529 0 0
19 2000 53–15 77.9% #7 1,993 0 6 1996 3–9 25.0% #152 1,509 0 0
20 2001 71–15 82.6% #1 2,116 1 12 1997 17–23 42.5% #104 1,630 0 0
21 2002 61–16 79.2% #1 2,062 2 17 1998 14–15 48.3% #80 1,661 0 0
22 2003 29–10 74.4% #17 1,939 2 19 1999 17–26 39.5% #82 1,645 0 0
23 2004 64–16 80.0% #3 2,076 2 23 2000 14–16 46.7% #97 1,674 0 0
24 2005 36–9 80.0% #4 2,092 2 24 2001 3–12 20.0% #177 1,596 0 0
25 2006 32–14 69.6% #20 1,964 2 25 2002 5–6 45.5% #106 1,619 0 0
26 2007 34–15 69.4% #21 1,925 2 26 2003 9–17 34.6% #106 1,534 0 0
27 2008 17–10 63.0% #67 1,936 2 26 2004 1–5 16.7% #162 1,508 0 0
28 2009 33–19 63.5% #22 1,956 2 27 2005 8–9 47.1% #104 1,595 0 0
29 2010 18–11 62.1% #54 1,907 2 28 2006 14–20 41.2% #86 1,606 0 0
30 2011 8–9 47.1% #186 1,817 2 28 2007 1–12 7.7% #556 1,536 0 0
31 2012 13–11 54.2% #83 1,867 2 28 — — — — — — —
32 2013 22–18 55.0% #60 1,884 2 28 — — — — — — —
33 2014 19–15 55.9% #50 1,841 2 30 — — — — — — —
34 2015 3–9 25.0% #307 1,715 2 30 — — — — — — —
35 2016 1–1 50.0% #633 1,727 2 30 — — — — — — —