H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC

Lleyton Hewitt vs Marcos Baghdatis H2H: 3-2

Lleyton Hewitt holds a 3–2 lead over Marcos Baghdatis in their ATP head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Lleyton Hewitt leads 3–1 on hard courts, while Marcos Baghdatis leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Lleyton Hewitt won the 2014 Memphis fourth round 1-6 6-2 6-0.

AUS Age 45 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
3 2
5 main draw meetings
CYP Age 41 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Feb 14, 2014* Memphis ATP 250 R16 Hard Lleyton Hewitt #40 1-6 6-2 6-0 Marcos Baghdatis #134 Match data
Jan 24, 2010* Australian Open Grand Slam R32 Hard Lleyton Hewitt #22 6-0 4-2 (ret.) Marcos Baghdatis #31 Match data
Jan 16, 2010* Sydney ATP 250 QF Hard Marcos Baghdatis #42 4-6 6-2 6-3 Lleyton Hewitt #22 Match data
Jan 20, 2008* Australian Open Grand Slam R32 Hard Lleyton Hewitt #22 4-6 7-5 7-5 6-7(4) 6-3 Marcos Baghdatis #16 Match data
Jul 7, 2006* Wimbledon Grand Slam QF Grass Marcos Baghdatis #16 6-1 5-7 7-6(5) 6-2 Lleyton Hewitt #9 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Lleyton Hewitt #636 #1 5,205 2,159 564 241 70.1% 2 2 2 1 23 30
Marcos Baghdatis #179 #8 2,111 1,952 324 272 54.4% 0 0 0 0 4 4

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Lleyton Hewitt Marcos Baghdatis
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1997 0–1 0.0% #550 1,492 0 0
17 1998 10–9 52.6% #100 1,614 0 1
18 1999 40–18 69.0% #25 1,853 0 2
19 2000 53–15 77.9% #7 1,993 0 6 2004 1–1 50.0% #159 1,559 0 0
20 2001 71–15 82.6% #1 2,116 1 12 2005 11–12 47.8% #55 1,694 0 0
21 2002 61–16 79.2% #1 2,062 2 17 2006 33–20 62.3% #12 1,842 0 1
22 2003 29–10 74.4% #17 1,939 2 19 2007 44–22 66.7% #16 1,937 0 2
23 2004 64–16 80.0% #3 2,076 2 23 2008 12–12 50.0% #98 1,815 0 2
24 2005 36–9 80.0% #4 2,092 2 24 2009 18–16 52.9% #42 1,810 0 3
25 2006 32–14 69.6% #20 1,964 2 25 2010 41–27 60.3% #20 1,852 0 4
26 2007 34–15 69.4% #21 1,925 2 26 2011 26–27 49.1% #44 1,844 0 4
27 2008 17–10 63.0% #67 1,936 2 26 2012 31–24 56.4% #36 1,897 0 4
28 2009 33–19 63.5% #22 1,956 2 27 2013 14–22 38.9% #87 1,804 0 4
29 2010 18–11 62.1% #54 1,907 2 28 2014 7–11 38.9% #85 1,703 0 4
30 2011 8–9 47.1% #186 1,817 2 28 2015 26–19 57.8% #46 1,869 0 4
31 2012 13–11 54.2% #83 1,867 2 28 2016 26–23 53.1% #36 1,884 0 4
32 2013 22–18 55.0% #60 1,884 2 28 2017 18–16 52.9% #102 1,839 0 4
33 2014 19–15 55.9% #50 1,841 2 30 2018 12–17 41.4% #124 1,723 0 4
34 2015 3–9 25.0% #307 1,715 2 30 2019 4–3 57.1% #179 1,740 0 4
35 2016 1–1 50.0% #633 1,727 2 30