H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Lleyton Hewitt vs Mark Woodforde H2H: 5-1

Lleyton Hewitt holds a 5–1 lead over Mark Woodforde in their ATP head-to-head. Across 6 main-draw meetings, Lleyton Hewitt leads 5–0 on hard courts, while Mark Woodforde leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Lleyton Hewitt won the 2000 Adelaide third round 6-3 2-6 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Lleyton Hewitt
AUS Age 45 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
5 – 1
6 main draw meetings
Mark Woodforde
AUS Age 60 Left-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jan 6, 2000* Adelaide ATP 250 R32 Hard Lleyton Hewitt #25 6-3 2-6 6-1 Mark Woodforde #130 Match data
Apr 29, 1999* Atlanta ATP 250 R32 Clay Mark Woodforde #60 2-6 6-3 6-4 Lleyton Hewitt #56 Match data
Mar 16, 1999* Miami Masters Masters 1000 R128 Hard Lleyton Hewitt #57 6-2 6-1 Mark Woodforde #49 Match data
Mar 10, 1999* Indian Wells Masters Masters 1000 R64 Hard Lleyton Hewitt #65 4-6 6-2 6-4 Mark Woodforde #50 Match data
Mar 6, 1999* Scottsdale ATP 250 SF Hard Lleyton Hewitt #91 6-2 6-2 Mark Woodforde #66 Match data
Jan 9, 1998* Adelaide ATP 250 R16 Hard Lleyton Hewitt #550 4-6 7-6(1) 6-1 Mark Woodforde #46 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Lleyton Hewitt #636 #1 5,205 2,159 564 241 70.1% 2 2 2 1 23 30
Mark Woodforde #985 #19 1,291 1,922 313 294 51.6% 0 0 0 0 4 4

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Lleyton Hewitt Mark Woodforde
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1997 0–1 0.0% #550 1,492 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 1998 10–9 52.6% #100 1,614 0 1 — — — — — — —
18 1999 40–18 69.0% #25 1,853 0 2 — — — — — — —
19 2000 53–15 77.9% #7 1,993 0 6 1985 6–4 60.0% #127 1,578 0 0
20 2001 71–15 82.6% #1 2,116 1 12 1986 11–14 44.0% #181 1,546 0 1
21 2002 61–16 79.2% #1 2,062 2 17 1987 12–13 48.0% #67 1,648 0 1
22 2003 29–10 74.4% #17 1,939 2 19 1988 31–23 57.4% #42 1,800 0 2
23 2004 64–16 80.0% #3 2,076 2 23 1989 20–15 57.1% #75 1,710 0 3
24 2005 36–9 80.0% #4 2,092 2 24 1990 12–12 50.0% #101 1,716 0 3
25 2006 32–14 69.6% #20 1,964 2 25 1991 12–21 36.4% #88 1,631 0 3
26 2007 34–15 69.4% #21 1,925 2 26 1992 27–23 54.0% #40 1,814 0 3
27 2008 17–10 63.0% #67 1,936 2 26 1993 28–20 58.3% #28 1,792 0 4
28 2009 33–19 63.5% #22 1,956 2 27 1994 29–23 55.8% #43 1,792 0 4
29 2010 18–11 62.1% #54 1,907 2 28 1995 31–25 55.4% #51 1,760 0 4
30 2011 8–9 47.1% #186 1,817 2 28 1996 32–25 56.1% #27 1,800 0 4
31 2012 13–11 54.2% #83 1,867 2 28 1997 24–26 48.0% #46 1,731 0 4
32 2013 22–18 55.0% #60 1,884 2 28 1998 25–24 51.0% #58 1,747 0 4
33 2014 19–15 55.9% #50 1,841 2 30 1999 10–19 34.5% #130 1,611 0 4
34 2015 3–9 25.0% #307 1,715 2 30 2000 3–7 30.0% #321 1,584 0 4
35 2016 1–1 50.0% #633 1,727 2 30 — — — — — — —