H2H data updated: 2026-09-06 00:00 UTC

Lleyton Hewitt vs Mark Woodforde H2H: 5-1

Lleyton Hewitt holds a 5–1 lead over Mark Woodforde in their ATP head-to-head. Across 6 main-draw meetings, Lleyton Hewitt leads 5–0 on hard courts, while Mark Woodforde leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Lleyton Hewitt won the 2000 Adelaide International round of 32 6-3 2-6 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Lleyton Hewitt
AUS Age 45 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
5 – 1
6 main-draw meetings
Mark Woodforde
AUS Age 60 Left-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Lleyton Hewitt #25 6-3 2-6 6-1 Mark Woodforde #130 Match data Jan 6, 2000* R32 Adelaide International ATP International Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Hard
Mark Woodforde #60 2-6 6-3 6-4 Lleyton Hewitt #56 Match data Apr 29, 1999* R32 Atlanta ATP World Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Clay
Lleyton Hewitt #57 6-2 6-1 Mark Woodforde #49 Match data Mar 16, 1999* R128 Miami Open Masters 1000 Hard
Lleyton Hewitt #65 4-6 6-2 6-4 Mark Woodforde #50 Match data Mar 10, 1999* R64 Indian Wells Open Masters 1000 Hard
Lleyton Hewitt #91 6-2 6-2 Mark Woodforde #66 Match data Mar 6, 1999* SF Scottsdale ATP World Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Hard
Lleyton Hewitt #550 4-6 7-6(1) 6-1 Mark Woodforde #46 Match data Jan 9, 1998* R16 Adelaide International ATP World Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Lleyton Hewitt #636 #1 5,205 2,160 567 244 69.9% 2 2 2 2 22 30
Mark Woodforde #985 #19 1,291 1,921 313 294 51.6% 0 0 0 1 3 4

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Lleyton Hewitt Mark Woodforde
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1997 0–1 0.0% — 1,493 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 1998 10–9 52.6% #100 1,615 0 1 — — — — — — —
18 1999 40–18 69.0% #25 1,854 0 2 — — — — — — —
19 2000 53–16 76.8% #7 1,980 0 6 1985 6–4 60.0% #127 1,578 0 0
20 2001 71–15 82.6% #1 2,116 1 12 1986 11–14 44.0% #181 1,547 0 1
21 2002 61–16 79.2% #1 2,066 2 17 1987 12–13 48.0% #67 1,648 0 1
22 2003 29–10 74.4% #17 1,939 2 19 1988 31–23 57.4% #42 1,802 0 2
23 2004 64–16 80.0% #3 2,073 2 23 1989 20–15 57.1% #75 1,714 0 3
24 2005 36–9 80.0% #4 2,114 2 24 1990 12–12 50.0% #101 1,718 0 3
25 2006 32–14 69.6% #20 1,971 2 25 1991 12–21 36.4% #88 1,632 0 3
26 2007 34–15 69.4% #21 1,919 2 26 1992 27–23 54.0% #40 1,812 0 3
27 2008 18–11 62.1% #67 1,936 2 26 1993 28–20 58.3% #28 1,792 0 4
28 2009 33–19 63.5% #22 1,959 2 27 1994 29–23 55.8% #43 1,792 0 4
29 2010 18–11 62.1% #54 1,909 2 28 1995 31–25 55.4% #51 1,761 0 4
30 2011 8–9 47.1% #186 1,818 2 28 1996 32–25 56.1% #27 1,803 0 4
31 2012 15–12 55.6% #83 1,884 2 28 1997 24–26 48.0% #46 1,735 0 4
32 2013 22–18 55.0% #60 1,889 2 28 1998 25–24 51.0% #58 1,747 0 4
33 2014 19–15 55.9% #50 1,841 2 30 1999 10–19 34.5% #130 1,609 0 4
34 2015 3–9 25.0% #307 1,714 2 30 2000 3–7 30.0% #321 1,583 0 4
35 2016 1–1 50.0% #633 1,727 2 30 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Lleyton Hewitt Mark Woodforde
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 1997 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1998 7 6 13 53.8% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1999 20 10 30 66.7% 6 3 9 66.7% 8 3 11 72.7% 6 2 8 75.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2000 37 11 48 77.1% 8 3 11 72.7% 5 1 6 83.3% 3 1 4 75.0% 1985 — — — — — — — — 4 3 7 57.1% 2 1 3 66.7%
20 2001 48 10 58 82.8% 10 3 13 76.9% 13 1 14 92.9% 0 1 1 0.0% 1986 5 5 10 50.0% 1 6 7 14.3% 5 3 8 62.5% — — — —
21 2002 33 9 42 78.6% 10 5 15 66.7% 14 1 15 93.3% 4 1 5 80.0% 1987 6 5 11 54.5% 1 2 3 33.3% 4 5 9 44.4% 1 1 2 50.0%
22 2003 23 6 29 79.3% 4 2 6 66.7% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 1988 23 10 33 69.7% 5 7 12 41.7% 3 2 5 60.0% 0 4 4 0.0%
23 2004 44 9 53 83.0% 11 4 15 73.3% 7 2 9 77.8% 2 1 3 66.7% 1989 17 8 25 68.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0%
24 2005 29 7 36 80.6% — — — — 7 2 9 77.8% — — — — 1990 8 8 16 50.0% — — — — 3 2 5 60.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
25 2006 20 11 31 64.5% 3 2 5 60.0% 9 1 10 90.0% — — — — 1991 7 11 18 38.9% 1 5 6 16.7% 0 2 2 0.0% 4 3 7 57.1%
26 2007 21 9 30 70.0% 10 4 14 71.4% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — 1992 15 12 27 55.6% 5 4 9 55.6% 2 2 4 50.0% 5 5 10 50.0%
27 2008 10 8 18 55.6% 2 1 3 66.7% 6 2 8 75.0% — — — — 1993 15 12 27 55.6% 2 2 4 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 9 4 13 69.2%
28 2009 18 14 32 56.3% 9 3 12 75.0% 6 2 8 75.0% — — — — 1994 14 10 24 58.3% 9 5 14 64.3% 1 2 3 33.3% 5 6 11 45.5%
29 2010 5 6 11 45.5% 5 4 9 55.6% 8 1 9 88.9% — — — — 1995 14 12 26 53.8% 7 5 12 58.3% 5 3 8 62.5% 5 5 10 50.0%
30 2011 5 6 11 45.5% — — — — 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — 1996 22 13 35 62.9% 1 3 4 25.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 7 6 13 53.8%
31 2012 9 7 16 56.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 6 4 10 60.0% — — — — 1997 13 14 27 48.1% 5 4 9 55.6% 6 4 10 60.0% 0 4 4 0.0%
32 2013 13 12 25 52.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 9 3 12 75.0% — — — — 1998 10 14 24 41.7% 1 4 5 20.0% 8 4 12 66.7% 6 2 8 75.0%
33 2014 11 9 20 55.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 7 2 9 77.8% — — — — 1999 7 13 20 35.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — —
34 2015 3 5 8 37.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — 2000 3 6 9 33.3% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
35 2016 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 357 157 514 69.5% 79 43 122 64.8% 114 37 151 75.5% 17 7 24 70.8% — 179 153 332 53.9% 41 54 95 43.2% 48 43 91 52.7% 45 44 89 50.6%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 753/811 of Lleyton Hewitt's and 380/434 of Mark Woodforde's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Lleyton Hewitt Mark Woodforde
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
16 1997 1/1 4.0 3.0 55.6% 56.7% 43.8% 58.8% 50.0% 50.9% 30.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
17 1998 18/19 2.8 4.1 54.8% 68.2% 51.4% 54.4% 39.1% 60.4% 40.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
18 1999 51/58 3.9 2.2 59.1% 71.5% 56.2% 61.1% 49.8% 65.1% 42.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
19 2000 56/69 6.3 3.6 53.9% 75.5% 55.3% 64.9% 51.6% 66.2% 41.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
20 2001 72/86 5.5 3.6 53.4% 75.7% 56.2% 60.8% 48.0% 66.5% 44.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
21 2002 62/77 7.2 4.0 51.4% 74.9% 54.3% 59.2% 42.9% 64.7% 43.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
22 2003 39/39 6.5 4.1 51.7% 77.0% 55.0% 62.9% 47.7% 66.2% 44.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
23 2004 80/80 6.3 3.6 54.2% 76.8% 55.1% 64.6% 47.8% 66.9% 42.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
24 2005 43/45 9.2 3.8 56.4% 78.8% 54.0% 62.8% 45.7% 68.1% 41.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
25 2006 46/46 7.3 3.8 55.1% 71.5% 52.6% 51.5% 46.1% 63.0% 43.0% 1991 29/33 2.5 3.0 55.8% 65.5% 47.4% 50.6% 38.5% 57.4% 37.7%
26 2007 48/49 7.6 3.3 53.6% 76.5% 54.8% 59.0% 51.1% 66.2% 40.3% 1992 45/50 4.4 3.2 58.7% 72.6% 48.1% 59.0% 42.7% 62.7% 39.2%
27 2008 27/29 8.2 3.0 54.5% 76.2% 57.4% 57.7% 37.6% 67.8% 42.0% 1993 44/48 4.5 3.3 56.8% 71.9% 50.1% 65.2% 46.4% 62.2% 39.5%
28 2009 52/52 6.5 3.7 53.3% 76.0% 53.3% 62.4% 41.5% 65.5% 41.5% 1994 44/52 4.4 3.3 53.5% 72.9% 53.2% 58.2% 39.2% 63.6% 39.5%
29 2010 29/29 6.3 2.9 56.7% 74.5% 52.0% 56.1% 55.1% 64.6% 42.0% 1995 53/56 4.4 3.8 57.5% 72.8% 51.7% 55.9% 37.9% 63.5% 40.7%
30 2011 17/17 6.6 3.8 56.3% 72.4% 48.7% 54.8% 43.7% 61.8% 37.3% 1996 49/57 5.2 3.8 58.4% 73.8% 50.2% 65.5% 46.4% 64.0% 37.5%
31 2012 24/27 5.8 4.2 52.4% 70.5% 47.8% 57.9% 41.3% 59.7% 37.7% 1997 41/50 5.7 4.1 58.5% 71.7% 47.3% 60.7% 41.1% 61.2% 38.6%
32 2013 40/40 6.2 4.0 51.1% 70.1% 51.9% 59.4% 46.6% 61.1% 39.0% 1998 40/49 5.0 3.8 55.1% 73.1% 48.5% 58.7% 44.8% 62.1% 36.4%
33 2014 34/34 4.9 4.8 53.5% 72.2% 49.7% 59.4% 44.0% 61.3% 39.9% 1999 27/29 5.4 3.0 62.9% 67.2% 48.5% 57.7% 42.1% 59.9% 36.6%
34 2015 12/12 6.8 4.8 54.4% 68.6% 51.2% 55.9% 42.4% 60.7% 37.7% 2000 8/10 2.4 3.5 57.8% 64.1% 49.6% 52.0% 35.6% 58.2% 37.6%
35 2016 2/2 6.0 4.0 54.8% 71.6% 47.1% 70.8% 22.9% 60.4% 38.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 753/811 6.4 3.7 54.1% 74.4% 53.8% 60.2% 46.4% 64.9% 41.8% — 380/607 4.6 3.5 57.3% 71.6% 49.7% 59.3% 42.1% 62.1% 38.6%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Lleyton Hewitt Mark Woodforde
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 1997 1493 104.6 +1.87 +1.38 0.627 41.7% — — — 0.0% -2.67 — — — -0.13 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1998 1615 137.2 -0.46 +2.56 1.025 50.0% +26 — -8 52.9% +0.21 5–6 (45%) 7–4 (64%) 103.2 -0.28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1999 1854 154.0 +2.80 +4.93 1.226 53.8% -9 -254 -123 64.6% +1.10 12–9 (57%) 8–10 (44%) 104.4 -2.41 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2000 1980 166.2 +3.71 +4.99 1.237 53.9% +30 -228 -146 69.5% +1.24 14–6 (70%) 11–14 (44%) 102.4 -2.06 1985 1579 111.5 — — — — -12 — +27 58.6% +0.41 1–2 (33%) 3–2 (60%) 98.8 +1.07
20 2001 2117 162.4 +4.29 +6.67 1.319 54.9% +8 -224 -121 72.0% +1.50 24–9 (73%) 13–9 (59%) 104.9 +1.18 1986 1547 116.0 — — — — +33 -49 +94 41.7% -0.80 3–3 (50%) 5–4 (56%) 102.1 +1.28
21 2002 2066 162.1 +3.20 +6.04 1.230 53.8% +19 -160 +114 70.4% +1.26 18–1 (95%) 18–12 (60%) 108.8 -1.87 1987 1648 124.1 — — — — +11 -154 -35 49.3% +0.15 6–5 (55%) 4–5 (44%) 101.9 +0.67
22 2003 1940 148.3 +2.77 +6.39 1.313 54.9% +95 -50 +219 66.4% +1.31 8–5 (62%) 8–9 (47%) 92.8 +1.40 1988 1802 150.3 — — — — +12 -238 -103 56.2% +0.39 9–9 (50%) 8–7 (53%) 104.5 -2.00
23 2004 2074 161.5 +4.35 +6.35 1.292 54.5% +33 -141 +46 72.4% +1.40 13–6 (68%) 17–7 (71%) 103.8 -2.32 1989 1715 129.3 — — — — +66 -145 -42 53.1% +0.08 7–6 (54%) 7–8 (47%) 99.1 +1.09
24 2005 2115 161.5 +4.84 +5.29 1.294 54.3% +42 — +76 69.3% +1.35 12–0 (100%) 14–10 (58%) 107.6 -1.18 1990 1718 128.5 — — — — +12 — +3 50.0% -0.05 3–2 (60%) 1–5 (17%) 97.3 -0.18
25 2006 1972 142.5 +1.60 +4.43 1.161 52.6% -20 -18 +235 63.1% +0.95 13–5 (72%) 9–8 (53%) 99.4 +0.55 1991 1633 130.1 -2.30 -0.49 0.885 47.4% +67 -69 — 36.9% -0.96 5–3 (63%) 6–5 (55%) 101.8 -1.26
26 2007 1919 154.1 +2.55 +3.26 1.191 53.1% -12 +96 +217 64.8% +0.95 7–5 (58%) 7–13 (35%) 94.4 +1.23 1992 1813 146.1 +1.29 +1.66 1.050 50.8% +8 -233 -144 53.6% +0.17 6–10 (38%) 14–9 (61%) 101.0 -3.48
27 2008 1937 143.9 +3.50 +4.91 1.303 53.9% -73 +79 +208 61.5% +1.03 2–3 (40%) 4–10 (29%) 92.4 -1.01 1993 1793 147.8 +1.20 +1.32 1.046 50.8% +19 -190 -121 56.7% +0.46 9–7 (56%) 8–7 (53%) 100.4 -0.21
28 2009 1960 156.8 +1.58 +4.92 1.202 53.0% -71 +63 +224 61.0% +0.81 11–9 (55%) 8–12 (40%) 97.5 -1.75 1994 1793 144.0 +2.05 +1.57 1.087 51.3% +8 -106 -143 54.0% +0.28 7–4 (64%) 9–9 (50%) 101.3 -1.31
29 2010 1909 143.7 +1.71 +4.35 1.187 53.0% -77 +73 +318 56.2% +0.49 6–3 (67%) 6–2 (75%) 103.7 -0.34 1995 1761 143.4 +1.40 +2.84 1.115 51.5% -7 -71 -60 57.0% +0.31 6–9 (40%) 12–10 (55%) 96.4 -2.71
30 2011 1819 131.8 -1.17 +0.07 0.976 49.8% -42 — +318 52.3% +0.32 2–4 (33%) 3–5 (38%) 94.5 -0.11 1996 1803 152.4 +2.11 +1.19 1.039 51.0% +37 -161 -119 53.2% +0.43 11–9 (55%) 11–14 (44%) 99.0 -3.08
31 2012 1884 145.7 -2.14 +1.74 0.935 48.9% 0 — +205 50.0% -0.29 6–3 (67%) 4–4 (50%) 102.4 -0.31 1997 1736 142.0 -0.58 +1.92 0.993 49.9% +5 -6 +26 51.5% +0.08 6–10 (38%) 11–9 (55%) 98.9 -0.85
32 2013 1889 147.2 -2.06 +2.77 1.005 50.2% -35 -33 +197 51.8% +0.17 12–8 (60%) 9–7 (56%) 104.4 -1.05 1998 1748 139.4 +0.21 -0.55 0.962 49.2% -9 -86 +48 52.0% +0.15 8–10 (44%) 7–10 (41%) 93.9 -0.36
33 2014 1842 149.1 -2.59 +3.22 1.032 50.5% +15 -61 +258 52.3% +0.10 9–4 (69%) 4–7 (36%) 100.9 -0.31 1999 1610 125.8 -1.05 -0.14 0.914 48.2% +18 +2 +120 39.5% -0.32 6–7 (46%) 4–11 (27%) 93.5 -0.93
34 2015 1715 118.7 -3.34 +0.79 0.958 49.2% +73 — +259 40.5% -0.65 0–7 (0%) 2–1 (67%) 90.2 +0.96 2000 1584 116.0 -0.30 +0.27 0.898 47.9% +5 — — 45.8% -0.29 0–3 (0%) 1–1 — -0.24
35 2016 1727 113.5 +0.52 +0.37 0.970 49.3% — — — 50.0% -0.17 — 1–0 — +0.04 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2160 162.0 +2.20 +4.74 1.192 53.1% +6 -84 +125 63.9% +0.95 174–93 (65%) 153–144 (52%) 100.9 -1.21 — 1921 146.3 +0.70 +1.19 1.018 50.2% +18 -119 -13 51.6% +0.11 93–99 (48%) 111–116 (49%) 97.4 -2.06

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.