H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC

Lleyton Hewitt vs Nicolas Almagro H2H: 1-1

Lleyton Hewitt and Nicolas Almagro are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Lleyton Hewitt leads 1–0 on clay, while Nicolas Almagro leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Nicolas Almagro won the 2012 Stockholm quarterfinal 6-1 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Lleyton Hewitt
AUS Age 45 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
1 – 1
2 main draw meetings
Nicolas Almagro
ESP Age 40 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Oct 20, 2012* Stockholm ATP 250 QF Hard Nicolas Almagro #12 6-1 6-4 Lleyton Hewitt #102 Match data
May 19, 2007* Hamburg Masters Masters 1000 QF Clay Lleyton Hewitt #21 6-3 6-4 Nicolas Almagro #52 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Lleyton Hewitt #636 #1 5,205 2,159 564 241 70.1% 2 2 2 1 23 30
Nicolas Almagro #846 #9 2,735 2,076 385 272 58.6% 0 0 0 2 11 13

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Lleyton Hewitt Nicolas Almagro
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1997 0–1 0.0% #550 1,492 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 1998 10–9 52.6% #100 1,614 0 1 2003 1–1 50.0% #156 1,511 0 0
18 1999 40–18 69.0% #25 1,853 0 2 2004 2–7 22.2% #103 1,539 0 0
19 2000 53–15 77.9% #7 1,993 0 6 2005 13–22 37.1% #114 1,551 0 0
20 2001 71–15 82.6% #1 2,116 1 12 2006 27–20 57.4% #32 1,721 0 1
21 2002 61–16 79.2% #1 2,062 2 17 2007 32–27 54.2% #28 1,723 0 2
22 2003 29–10 74.4% #17 1,939 2 19 2008 34–16 68.0% #18 1,794 0 4
23 2004 64–16 80.0% #3 2,076 2 23 2009 30–24 55.6% #26 1,831 0 5
24 2005 36–9 80.0% #4 2,092 2 24 2010 41–23 64.1% #15 1,885 0 7
25 2006 32–14 69.6% #20 1,964 2 25 2011 47–23 67.1% #10 1,874 0 10
26 2007 34–15 69.4% #21 1,925 2 26 2012 51–21 70.8% #11 2,010 0 12
27 2008 17–10 63.0% #67 1,936 2 26 2013 42–23 64.6% #13 1,961 0 12
28 2009 33–19 63.5% #22 1,956 2 27 2014 15–10 60.0% #71 1,928 0 12
29 2010 18–11 62.1% #54 1,907 2 28 2015 18–20 47.4% #73 1,795 0 12
30 2011 8–9 47.1% #186 1,817 2 28 2016 22–22 50.0% #44 1,790 0 13
31 2012 13–11 54.2% #83 1,867 2 28 2017 10–12 45.5% #151 1,833 0 13
32 2013 22–18 55.0% #60 1,884 2 28 2018 0–1 0.0% #846 1,777 0 13
33 2014 19–15 55.9% #50 1,841 2 30 — — — — — — —
34 2015 3–9 25.0% #307 1,715 2 30 — — — — — — —
35 2016 1–1 50.0% #633 1,727 2 30 — — — — — — —