H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC

Lleyton Hewitt vs Nicolas Kiefer H2H: 3-0

Lleyton Hewitt holds a 3–0 lead over Nicolas Kiefer in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Lleyton Hewitt leads 3–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Lleyton Hewitt won the 2003 Los Angeles semifinal 6-2 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Lleyton Hewitt
AUS Age 45 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
3 – 0
3 main draw meetings
Nicolas Kiefer
GER Age 49 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Aug 2, 2003* Los Angeles ATP 250 SF Hard Lleyton Hewitt #5 6-2 6-4 Nicolas Kiefer #75 Match data
Jan 15, 1999* Sydney ATP 250 R16 Hard Lleyton Hewitt #104 6-4 6-2 Nicolas Kiefer #36 Match data
Jan 7, 1999* Adelaide ATP 250 R32 Hard Lleyton Hewitt #100 7-5 6-4 Nicolas Kiefer #35 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Lleyton Hewitt #636 #1 5,205 2,159 564 241 70.1% 2 2 2 1 23 30
Nicolas Kiefer #720 #4 2,447 1,984 343 252 57.6% 0 0 0 0 6 6

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Lleyton Hewitt Nicolas Kiefer
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1997 0–1 0.0% #550 1,492 0 0 1994 0–1 0.0% #1198 1,489 0 0
17 1998 10–9 52.6% #100 1,614 0 1 1995 3–3 50.0% #206 1,527 0 0
18 1999 40–18 69.0% #25 1,853 0 2 1996 7–9 43.8% #128 1,562 0 0
19 2000 53–15 77.9% #7 1,993 0 6 1997 26–16 61.9% #32 1,798 0 1
20 2001 71–15 82.6% #1 2,116 1 12 1998 31–25 55.4% #35 1,790 0 1
21 2002 61–16 79.2% #1 2,062 2 17 1999 53–21 71.6% #6 1,921 0 4
22 2003 29–10 74.4% #17 1,939 2 19 2000 30–15 66.7% #20 1,921 0 6
23 2004 64–16 80.0% #3 2,076 2 23 2001 26–25 51.0% #42 1,766 0 6
24 2005 36–9 80.0% #4 2,092 2 24 2002 19–24 44.2% #72 1,718 0 6
25 2006 32–14 69.6% #20 1,964 2 25 2003 19–17 52.8% #58 1,727 0 6
26 2007 34–15 69.4% #21 1,925 2 26 2004 32–19 62.7% #21 1,897 0 6
27 2008 17–10 63.0% #67 1,936 2 26 2005 31–22 58.5% #22 1,854 0 6
28 2009 33–19 63.5% #22 1,956 2 27 2006 14–8 63.6% #48 1,843 0 6
29 2010 18–11 62.1% #54 1,907 2 28 2007 19–12 61.3% #49 1,893 0 6
30 2011 8–9 47.1% #186 1,817 2 28 2008 20–16 55.6% #38 1,876 0 6
31 2012 13–11 54.2% #83 1,867 2 28 2009 12–16 42.9% #116 1,757 0 6
32 2013 22–18 55.0% #60 1,884 2 28 2010 1–3 25.0% #722 1,717 0 6
33 2014 19–15 55.9% #50 1,841 2 30 — — — — — — —
34 2015 3–9 25.0% #307 1,715 2 30 — — — — — — —
35 2016 1–1 50.0% #633 1,727 2 30 — — — — — — —