H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC
Lleyton Hewitt vs Nicolas Lapentti H2H: 1-2
Nicolas Lapentti holds a 2–1 lead over Lleyton Hewitt in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Nicolas Lapentti leads 2–0 on carpet, while Lleyton Hewitt leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Nicolas Lapentti won the 2001 Paris Masters third round 4-6 6-4 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
AUS
Age 45
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
1
–
2
3 main draw meetings
ECU
Age 49
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 1, 2001* | Paris Masters | Masters 1000 | R32 | Carpet | Nicolas Lapentti | 4-6 6-4 6-4 | Lleyton Hewitt | Match data |
| Mar 22, 2001* | Miami Masters | Masters 1000 | R32 | Hard | Lleyton Hewitt | 6-3 6-3 | Nicolas Lapentti | Match data |
| Oct 24, 1999* | Lyon | ATP 250 | F | Carpet | Nicolas Lapentti | 6-3 6-2 | Lleyton Hewitt | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lleyton Hewitt | #636 | #1 | 5,205 | 2,159 | 564 | 241 | 70.1% | 2 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 23 | 30 |
| Nicolas Lapentti | #885 | #6 | 2,293 | 1,935 | 282 | 280 | 50.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 5 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Lleyton Hewitt | Nicolas Lapentti | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 1997 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #550 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1998 | 10–9 | 52.6% | #100 | 1,614 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1999 | 40–18 | 69.0% | #25 | 1,853 | 0 | 2 | 1995 | 5–0 | 100.0% | #109 | 1,594 | 0 | 1 |
| 19 | 2000 | 53–15 | 77.9% | #7 | 1,993 | 0 | 6 | 1996 | 11–19 | 36.7% | #121 | 1,576 | 0 | 1 |
| 20 | 2001 | 71–15 | 82.6% | #1 | 2,116 | 1 | 12 | 1997 | 17–18 | 48.6% | #63 | 1,660 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 2002 | 61–16 | 79.2% | #1 | 2,062 | 2 | 17 | 1998 | 16–29 | 35.6% | #90 | 1,596 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 2003 | 29–10 | 74.4% | #17 | 1,939 | 2 | 19 | 1999 | 52–24 | 68.4% | #8 | 1,883 | 0 | 3 |
| 23 | 2004 | 64–16 | 80.0% | #3 | 2,076 | 2 | 23 | 2000 | 40–28 | 58.8% | #24 | 1,755 | 0 | 3 |
| 24 | 2005 | 36–9 | 80.0% | #4 | 2,092 | 2 | 24 | 2001 | 30–22 | 57.7% | #23 | 1,837 | 0 | 4 |
| 25 | 2006 | 32–14 | 69.6% | #20 | 1,964 | 2 | 25 | 2002 | 32–27 | 54.2% | #29 | 1,714 | 0 | 5 |
| 26 | 2007 | 34–15 | 69.4% | #21 | 1,925 | 2 | 26 | 2003 | 20–22 | 47.6% | #57 | 1,697 | 0 | 5 |
| 27 | 2008 | 17–10 | 63.0% | #67 | 1,936 | 2 | 26 | 2004 | 7–14 | 33.3% | #122 | 1,600 | 0 | 5 |
| 28 | 2009 | 33–19 | 63.5% | #22 | 1,956 | 2 | 27 | 2005 | 9–16 | 36.0% | #95 | 1,579 | 0 | 5 |
| 29 | 2010 | 18–11 | 62.1% | #54 | 1,907 | 2 | 28 | 2006 | 12–9 | 57.1% | #67 | 1,682 | 0 | 5 |
| 30 | 2011 | 8–9 | 47.1% | #186 | 1,817 | 2 | 28 | 2007 | 10–14 | 41.7% | #109 | 1,611 | 0 | 5 |
| 31 | 2012 | 13–11 | 54.2% | #83 | 1,867 | 2 | 28 | 2008 | 14–17 | 45.2% | #86 | 1,658 | 0 | 5 |
| 32 | 2013 | 22–18 | 55.0% | #60 | 1,884 | 2 | 28 | 2009 | 6–14 | 30.0% | #97 | 1,668 | 0 | 5 |
| 33 | 2014 | 19–15 | 55.9% | #50 | 1,841 | 2 | 30 | 2010 | 1–7 | 12.5% | #447 | 1,582 | 0 | 5 |
| 34 | 2015 | 3–9 | 25.0% | #307 | 1,715 | 2 | 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | 2016 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #633 | 1,727 | 2 | 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |