H2H data updated: 2026-09-01 00:00 UTC

Lleyton Hewitt vs Paul-Henri Mathieu H2H: 3-1

Lleyton Hewitt holds a 3–1 lead over Paul-Henri Mathieu in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts, while Lleyton Hewitt leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Paul-Henri Mathieu won the 2010 US Open first round 6-3 6-4 5-7 4-6 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Lleyton Hewitt
AUS Age 45 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
3 – 1
4 main draw meetings
Paul-Henri Mathieu
FRA Age 44 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Paul-Henri Mathieu #109 6-3 6-4 5-7 4-6 6-1 Lleyton Hewitt #34 Match data Sep 1, 2010* R128 US Open Grand Slam Hard
Lleyton Hewitt #30 6-4 6-4 Paul-Henri Mathieu #17 Match data Jun 13, 2008* R16 Queen's Club Championships International Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Grass
Lleyton Hewitt #2 6-1 6-0 Paul-Henri Mathieu #96 Match data Mar 12, 2005* R16 Indian Wells Open Masters 1000 Hard
Lleyton Hewitt #6 7-6(2) 4-6 6-3 6-2 Paul-Henri Mathieu #238 Match data May 30, 2001* R128 Roland Garros Grand Slam Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Lleyton Hewitt #636 #1 5,205 2,160 567 244 69.9% 2 2 2 2 22 30
Paul-Henri Mathieu #914 #12 2,000 1,961 271 298 47.6% 0 0 0 0 4 4

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Lleyton Hewitt Paul-Henri Mathieu
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1997 0–1 0.0% — 1,493 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 1998 10–9 52.6% #100 1,615 0 1 — — — — — — —
18 1999 40–18 69.0% #25 1,854 0 2 2000 2–3 40.0% #275 1,487 0 0
19 2000 53–16 76.8% #7 1,980 0 6 2001 0–2 0.0% #150 1,468 0 0
20 2001 71–15 82.6% #1 2,116 1 12 2002 23–14 62.2% #36 1,838 0 2
21 2002 61–16 79.2% #1 2,066 2 17 2003 16–23 41.0% #83 1,683 0 2
22 2003 29–10 74.4% #17 1,939 2 19 2004 9–10 47.4% #123 1,661 0 2
23 2004 64–16 80.0% #3 2,073 2 23 2005 26–27 49.1% #46 1,721 0 2
24 2005 36–9 80.0% #4 2,114 2 24 2006 23–28 45.1% #55 1,668 0 2
25 2006 32–14 69.6% #20 1,971 2 25 2007 45–23 66.2% #25 1,872 0 4
26 2007 34–15 69.4% #21 1,919 2 26 2008 32–26 55.2% #31 1,772 0 4
27 2008 18–11 62.1% #67 1,936 2 26 2009 28–29 49.1% #33 1,752 0 4
28 2009 33–19 63.5% #22 1,959 2 27 2010 10–19 34.5% #97 1,740 0 4
29 2010 18–11 62.1% #54 1,909 2 28 — — — — — — —
30 2011 8–9 47.1% #186 1,818 2 28 2012 14–17 45.2% #58 1,824 0 4
31 2012 15–12 55.6% #83 1,884 2 28 2013 6–19 24.0% #129 1,723 0 4
32 2013 22–18 55.0% #60 1,889 2 28 2014 11–17 39.3% #96 1,758 0 4
33 2014 19–15 55.9% #50 1,841 2 30 2015 7–12 36.8% #95 1,762 0 4
34 2015 3–9 25.0% #307 1,714 2 30 2016 18–20 47.4% #73 1,686 0 4
35 2016 1–1 50.0% #633 1,727 2 30 2017 1–9 10.0% #249 1,577 0 4

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Lleyton Hewitt Paul-Henri Mathieu
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 1997 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1998 7 6 13 53.8% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1999 20 10 30 66.7% 6 3 9 66.7% 8 3 11 72.7% 6 2 8 75.0% 2000 1 2 3 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
19 2000 37 11 48 77.1% 8 3 11 72.7% 5 1 6 83.3% 3 1 4 75.0% 2001 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
20 2001 48 10 58 82.8% 10 3 13 76.9% 13 1 14 92.9% 0 1 1 0.0% 2002 4 6 10 40.0% 8 7 15 53.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 10 0 10 100.0%
21 2002 33 9 42 78.6% 10 5 15 66.7% 14 1 15 93.3% 4 1 5 80.0% 2003 2 5 7 28.6% 11 11 22 50.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 3 4 7 42.9%
22 2003 23 6 29 79.3% 4 2 6 66.7% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 2004 7 4 11 63.6% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — 0 3 3 0.0%
23 2004 44 9 53 83.0% 11 4 15 73.3% 7 2 9 77.8% 2 1 3 66.7% 2005 12 11 23 52.2% 9 11 20 45.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 3 2 5 60.0%
24 2005 29 7 36 80.6% — — — — 7 2 9 77.8% — — — — 2006 9 13 22 40.9% 12 9 21 57.1% 0 3 3 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0%
25 2006 20 11 31 64.5% 3 2 5 60.0% 9 1 10 90.0% — — — — 2007 22 16 38 57.9% 16 4 20 80.0% 7 3 10 70.0% — — — —
26 2007 21 9 30 70.0% 10 4 14 71.4% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — 2008 22 15 37 59.5% 6 7 13 46.2% 3 3 6 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
27 2008 10 8 18 55.6% 2 1 3 66.7% 6 2 8 75.0% — — — — 2009 16 17 33 48.5% 10 9 19 52.6% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — —
28 2009 18 14 32 56.3% 9 3 12 75.0% 6 2 8 75.0% — — — — 2010 7 10 17 41.2% 0 8 8 0.0% 3 1 4 75.0% — — — —
29 2010 5 6 11 45.5% 5 4 9 55.6% 8 1 9 88.9% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2011 5 6 11 45.5% — — — — 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — 2012 7 10 17 41.2% 7 5 12 58.3% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
31 2012 9 7 16 56.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 6 4 10 60.0% — — — — 2013 3 8 11 27.3% 2 8 10 20.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — —
32 2013 13 12 25 52.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 9 3 12 75.0% — — — — 2014 7 8 15 46.7% 3 6 9 33.3% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — —
33 2014 11 9 20 55.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 7 2 9 77.8% — — — — 2015 1 7 8 12.5% 6 4 10 60.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
34 2015 3 5 8 37.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — 2016 6 9 15 40.0% 10 8 18 55.6% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — —
35 2016 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2017 1 5 6 16.7% 0 4 4 0.0% — — — — — — — —
Career — 357 157 514 69.5% 79 43 122 64.8% 114 37 151 75.5% 17 7 24 70.8% — 127 146 273 46.5% 103 106 209 49.3% 22 32 54 40.7% 19 14 33 57.6%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 753/811 of Lleyton Hewitt's and 516/525 of Paul-Henri Mathieu's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Lleyton Hewitt Paul-Henri Mathieu
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
16 1997 1/1 4.0 3.0 55.6% 56.7% 43.8% 58.8% 50.0% 50.9% 30.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
17 1998 18/19 2.8 4.1 54.8% 68.2% 51.4% 54.4% 39.1% 60.4% 40.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
18 1999 51/58 3.9 2.2 59.1% 71.5% 56.2% 61.1% 49.8% 65.1% 42.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
19 2000 56/69 6.3 3.6 53.9% 75.5% 55.3% 64.9% 51.6% 66.2% 41.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
20 2001 72/86 5.5 3.6 53.4% 75.7% 56.2% 60.8% 48.0% 66.5% 44.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
21 2002 62/77 7.2 4.0 51.4% 74.9% 54.3% 59.2% 42.9% 64.7% 43.4% 2003 38/39 3.6 3.7 50.2% 70.0% 48.7% 51.2% 42.6% 59.7% 38.5%
22 2003 39/39 6.5 4.1 51.7% 77.0% 55.0% 62.9% 47.7% 66.2% 44.4% 2004 19/19 5.8 2.9 51.5% 73.7% 52.5% 64.5% 48.1% 63.3% 33.3%
23 2004 80/80 6.3 3.6 54.2% 76.8% 55.1% 64.6% 47.8% 66.9% 42.7% 2005 53/53 4.2 2.9 54.3% 69.8% 51.7% 53.0% 45.3% 61.6% 37.7%
24 2005 43/45 9.2 3.8 56.4% 78.8% 54.0% 62.8% 45.7% 68.1% 41.3% 2006 50/51 4.2 2.7 58.3% 70.4% 52.9% 48.9% 45.8% 62.8% 38.6%
25 2006 46/46 7.3 3.8 55.1% 71.5% 52.6% 51.5% 46.1% 63.0% 43.0% 2007 68/68 4.8 2.3 56.0% 73.9% 54.4% 65.2% 46.1% 65.3% 40.2%
26 2007 48/49 7.6 3.3 53.6% 76.5% 54.8% 59.0% 51.1% 66.2% 40.3% 2008 53/58 5.6 2.9 55.7% 73.5% 53.8% 61.1% 42.2% 64.9% 35.0%
27 2008 27/29 8.2 3.0 54.5% 76.2% 57.4% 57.7% 37.6% 67.8% 42.0% 2009 57/57 5.9 2.4 56.3% 71.4% 50.0% 56.9% 45.0% 62.1% 35.4%
28 2009 52/52 6.5 3.7 53.3% 76.0% 53.3% 62.4% 41.5% 65.5% 41.5% 2010 28/29 6.3 3.7 54.3% 71.9% 49.8% 63.1% 41.0% 61.7% 33.9%
29 2010 29/29 6.3 2.9 56.7% 74.5% 52.0% 56.1% 55.1% 64.6% 42.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
30 2011 17/17 6.6 3.8 56.3% 72.4% 48.7% 54.8% 43.7% 61.8% 37.3% 2012 31/31 4.9 4.3 52.8% 74.8% 51.2% 58.3% 38.4% 63.6% 36.6%
31 2012 24/27 5.8 4.2 52.4% 70.5% 47.8% 57.9% 41.3% 59.7% 37.7% 2013 25/25 5.0 4.2 54.4% 70.0% 47.4% 53.8% 36.3% 59.7% 31.0%
32 2013 40/40 6.2 4.0 51.1% 70.1% 51.9% 59.4% 46.6% 61.1% 39.0% 2014 28/28 4.1 3.1 56.1% 69.4% 54.2% 63.1% 31.0% 62.7% 34.1%
33 2014 34/34 4.9 4.8 53.5% 72.2% 49.7% 59.4% 44.0% 61.3% 39.9% 2015 19/19 4.9 3.5 56.2% 70.8% 50.0% 64.0% 46.3% 61.4% 35.9%
34 2015 12/12 6.8 4.8 54.4% 68.6% 51.2% 55.9% 42.4% 60.7% 37.7% 2016 37/38 4.6 4.1 55.5% 70.5% 49.5% 56.4% 42.2% 61.2% 36.6%
35 2016 2/2 6.0 4.0 54.8% 71.6% 47.1% 70.8% 22.9% 60.4% 38.4% 2017 10/10 4.9 3.5 55.5% 69.2% 45.9% 49.8% 31.7% 58.7% 31.6%
Career — 753/811 6.4 3.7 54.1% 74.4% 53.8% 60.2% 46.4% 64.9% 41.8% — 516/569 4.9 3.1 55.1% 71.6% 51.5% 57.8% 42.7% 62.5% 36.4%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Lleyton Hewitt Paul-Henri Mathieu
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 1997 1493 104.6 +1.87 +1.38 0.627 41.7% — — — 0.0% -2.67 — — — -0.13 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1998 1615 137.2 -0.46 +2.56 1.025 50.0% +26 — -8 52.9% +0.21 5–6 (45%) 7–4 (64%) — -0.28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1999 1854 154.0 +2.80 +4.93 1.226 53.8% -9 -254 -123 64.6% +1.10 12–9 (57%) 8–10 (44%) — -2.41 2000 1488 110.7 — — — — +27 — — 50.0% +0.38 — 1–1 — -0.26
19 2000 1980 166.2 +3.71 +4.99 1.237 53.9% +30 -228 -146 69.5% +1.24 14–6 (70%) 11–14 (44%) — -2.06 2001 1469 108.1 — — — — — — — 16.7% -2.33 — 0–1 — -0.28
20 2001 2117 162.4 +4.29 +6.67 1.319 54.9% +8 -224 -121 72.0% +1.50 24–9 (73%) 13–9 (59%) — +1.18 2002 1838 147.8 — — — — -53 -191 — 57.3% +0.70 9–6 (60%) 4–10 (29%) — -2.14
21 2002 2066 162.1 +3.20 +6.04 1.230 53.8% +19 -160 +114 70.4% +1.26 18–1 (95%) 18–12 (60%) — -1.87 2003 1683 131.8 -1.76 +0.72 0.955 49.3% +14 +18 -190 43.5% -0.24 7–7 (50%) 6–6 (50%) — +0.87
22 2003 1940 148.3 +2.77 +6.39 1.313 54.9% +95 -50 +219 66.4% +1.31 8–5 (62%) 8–9 (47%) — +1.40 2004 1662 129.7 +0.25 -2.44 0.908 49.2% +21 +37 — 54.3% +0.26 1–4 (20%) 7–5 (58%) — +0.94
23 2004 2074 161.5 +4.35 +6.35 1.292 54.5% +33 -141 +46 72.4% +1.40 13–6 (68%) 17–7 (71%) — -2.32 2005 1721 146.1 -0.23 +0.35 0.982 49.8% +16 -2 -193 47.6% -0.14 9–5 (64%) 11–5 (69%) — -0.89
24 2005 2115 161.5 +4.84 +5.29 1.294 54.3% +42 — +76 69.3% +1.35 12–0 (100%) 14–10 (58%) — -1.18 2006 1668 147.1 +0.86 +1.24 1.038 50.8% +21 +99 -189 49.6% +0.30 4–8 (33%) 14–14 (50%) — -1.91
25 2006 1972 142.5 +1.60 +4.43 1.161 52.6% -20 -18 +235 63.1% +0.95 13–5 (72%) 9–8 (53%) — +0.55 2007 1872 153.8 +2.35 +3.71 1.160 52.7% -63 +47 -163 63.6% +0.96 12–11 (52%) 15–10 (60%) — -2.62
26 2007 1919 154.1 +2.55 +3.26 1.191 53.1% -12 +96 +217 64.8% +0.95 7–5 (58%) 7–13 (35%) — +1.23 2008 1773 143.5 +1.38 -0.82 0.996 50.1% +50 +54 -52 57.2% +0.50 7–8 (47%) 19–11 (63%) — +1.07
27 2008 1937 143.9 +3.50 +4.91 1.303 53.9% -73 +79 +208 61.5% +1.03 2–3 (40%) 4–10 (29%) — -1.01 2009 1753 148.3 -0.53 -1.00 0.933 49.3% +4 +86 -22 48.5% -0.16 12–7 (63%) 10–12 (45%) — -1.11
28 2009 1960 156.8 +1.58 +4.92 1.202 53.0% -71 +63 +224 61.0% +0.81 11–9 (55%) 8–12 (40%) — -1.75 2010 1741 140.7 -0.84 -1.55 0.884 48.3% +11 -69 +86 41.9% -0.36 3–6 (33%) 5–10 (33%) — -0.85
29 2010 1909 143.7 +1.71 +4.35 1.187 53.0% -77 +73 +318 56.2% +0.49 6–3 (67%) 6–2 (75%) — -0.34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2011 1819 131.8 -1.17 +0.07 0.976 49.8% -42 — +318 52.3% +0.32 2–4 (33%) 3–5 (38%) — -0.11 2012 1825 146.0 +0.20 +0.21 1.006 49.9% -18 -70 — 47.6% -0.17 6–7 (46%) 11–9 (55%) — -0.57
31 2012 1884 145.7 -2.14 +1.74 0.935 48.9% 0 — +205 50.0% -0.29 6–3 (67%) 4–4 (50%) — -0.31 2013 1724 137.4 -2.54 -3.92 0.769 45.9% +57 -79 +37 31.0% -1.00 2–4 (33%) 2–7 (22%) — -1.74
32 2013 1889 147.2 -2.06 +2.77 1.005 50.2% -35 -33 +197 51.8% +0.17 12–8 (60%) 9–7 (56%) — -1.05 2014 1758 144.7 -0.81 -0.73 0.915 48.9% +44 -70 -10 40.0% -0.57 3–4 (43%) 6–9 (40%) — -2.93
33 2014 1842 149.1 -2.59 +3.22 1.032 50.5% +15 -61 +258 52.3% +0.10 9–4 (69%) 4–7 (36%) — -0.31 2015 1762 139.1 -1.11 -0.65 0.930 49.3% -90 +121 — 45.7% -0.24 2–6 (25%) 1–5 (17%) — -0.78
34 2015 1715 118.7 -3.34 +0.79 0.958 49.2% +73 — +259 40.5% -0.65 0–7 (0%) 2–1 (67%) — +0.96 2016 1687 137.2 -1.65 -0.68 0.944 49.3% -74 +156 +79 47.9% -0.20 6–7 (46%) 9–7 (56%) — +0.47
35 2016 1727 113.5 +0.52 +0.37 0.970 49.3% — — — 50.0% -0.17 — 1–0 — +0.04 2017 1577 115.7 -2.09 -3.20 0.766 45.8% -46 +142 — 24.0% -1.64 1–3 (25%) 2–2 (50%) — +0.96
Career — 2160 162.0 +2.20 +4.74 1.192 53.1% +6 -84 +125 63.9% +0.95 174–93 (65%) 153–144 (52%) 100.9 -1.21 — 1961 149.5 -0.07 -0.02 0.972 49.8% -2 +23 -67 49.4% +0.05 84–93 (47%) 123–124 (50%) 100.0 -2.08

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.