H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Lleyton Hewitt vs Paul-Henri Mathieu H2H: 3-1

Lleyton Hewitt holds a 3–1 lead over Paul-Henri Mathieu in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts, while Lleyton Hewitt leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Paul-Henri Mathieu won the 2010 US Open first round 6-3 6-4 5-7 4-6 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Lleyton Hewitt
AUS Age 45 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
3 – 1
4 main draw meetings
Paul-Henri Mathieu
FRA Age 44 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Sep 1, 2010* US Open Grand Slam R128 Hard Paul-Henri Mathieu #109 6-3 6-4 5-7 4-6 6-1 Lleyton Hewitt #34 Match data
Jun 13, 2008* Queen's Club ATP 500 R16 Grass Lleyton Hewitt #30 6-4 6-4 Paul-Henri Mathieu #17 Match data
Mar 12, 2005* Indian Wells Masters Masters 1000 R16 Hard Lleyton Hewitt #2 6-1 6-0 Paul-Henri Mathieu #96 Match data
May 30, 2001* Roland Garros Grand Slam R128 Clay Lleyton Hewitt #6 7-6(2) 4-6 6-3 6-2 Paul-Henri Mathieu #238 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Lleyton Hewitt #636 #1 5,205 2,159 564 241 70.1% 2 2 2 1 23 30
Paul-Henri Mathieu #914 #12 2,000 1,961 268 297 47.4% 0 0 0 0 4 4

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Lleyton Hewitt Paul-Henri Mathieu
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1997 0–1 0.0% #550 1,492 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 1998 10–9 52.6% #100 1,614 0 1 — — — — — — —
18 1999 40–18 69.0% #25 1,853 0 2 2000 2–3 40.0% #275 1,487 0 0
19 2000 53–15 77.9% #7 1,993 0 6 2001 0–2 0.0% #150 1,468 0 0
20 2001 71–15 82.6% #1 2,116 1 12 2002 23–14 62.2% #36 1,838 0 2
21 2002 61–16 79.2% #1 2,062 2 17 2003 16–23 41.0% #83 1,683 0 2
22 2003 29–10 74.4% #17 1,939 2 19 2004 9–10 47.4% #123 1,661 0 2
23 2004 64–16 80.0% #3 2,076 2 23 2005 26–27 49.1% #46 1,720 0 2
24 2005 36–9 80.0% #4 2,092 2 24 2006 23–28 45.1% #55 1,668 0 2
25 2006 32–14 69.6% #20 1,964 2 25 2007 45–23 66.2% #25 1,870 0 4
26 2007 34–15 69.4% #21 1,925 2 26 2008 29–25 53.7% #31 1,746 0 4
27 2008 17–10 63.0% #67 1,936 2 26 2009 28–29 49.1% #33 1,748 0 4
28 2009 33–19 63.5% #22 1,956 2 27 2010 10–19 34.5% #97 1,731 0 4
29 2010 18–11 62.1% #54 1,907 2 28 — — — — — — —
30 2011 8–9 47.1% #186 1,817 2 28 2012 14–17 45.2% #58 1,822 0 4
31 2012 13–11 54.2% #83 1,867 2 28 2013 6–19 24.0% #129 1,720 0 4
32 2013 22–18 55.0% #60 1,884 2 28 2014 11–17 39.3% #96 1,759 0 4
33 2014 19–15 55.9% #50 1,841 2 30 2015 7–12 36.8% #95 1,761 0 4
34 2015 3–9 25.0% #307 1,715 2 30 2016 18–20 47.4% #73 1,679 0 4
35 2016 1–1 50.0% #633 1,727 2 30 2017 1–9 10.0% #249 1,574 0 4