H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC

Lleyton Hewitt vs Radek Stepanek H2H: 3-1

Lleyton Hewitt holds a 3–1 lead over Radek Stepanek in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Lleyton Hewitt leads 2–1 on hard courts and 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Radek Stepanek won the 2012 Shanghai Masters second round 7-5 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Lleyton Hewitt
AUS Age 45 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
3 – 1
4 main draw meetings
Radek Stepanek
CZE Age 47 Right-Handed 186 cm / 6'1"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Oct 9, 2012* Shanghai Masters Masters 1000 R64 Hard Radek Stepanek #41 7-5 6-1 Lleyton Hewitt #105 Match data
Jun 30, 2009* Wimbledon Grand Slam R16 Grass Lleyton Hewitt #56 4-6 2-6 6-1 6-2 6-2 Radek Stepanek #23 Match data
Aug 31, 2003* US Open Grand Slam R32 Hard Lleyton Hewitt #6 6-1 3-0 (ret.) Radek Stepanek #46 Match data
Jan 19, 2003* Australian Open Grand Slam R32 Hard Lleyton Hewitt #1 6-3 6-2 6-0 Radek Stepanek #69 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Lleyton Hewitt #636 #1 5,205 2,159 564 241 70.1% 2 2 2 1 23 30
Radek Stepanek #492 #8 2,700 2,034 366 283 56.4% 0 0 0 1 4 5

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Lleyton Hewitt Radek Stepanek
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1997 0–1 0.0% #550 1,492 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 1998 10–9 52.6% #100 1,614 0 1 — — — — — — —
18 1999 40–18 69.0% #25 1,853 0 2 — — — — — — —
19 2000 53–15 77.9% #7 1,993 0 6 1998 0–1 0.0% #165 1,488 0 0
20 2001 71–15 82.6% #1 2,116 1 12 1999 2–4 33.3% #169 1,501 0 0
21 2002 61–16 79.2% #1 2,062 2 17 — — — — — — —
22 2003 29–10 74.4% #17 1,939 2 19 2001 0–1 0.0% #542 1,464 0 0
23 2004 64–16 80.0% #3 2,076 2 23 2002 17–14 54.8% #63 1,659 0 0
24 2005 36–9 80.0% #4 2,092 2 24 2003 24–22 52.2% #46 1,716 0 0
25 2006 32–14 69.6% #20 1,964 2 25 2004 28–23 54.9% #33 1,790 0 0
26 2007 34–15 69.4% #21 1,925 2 26 2005 45–26 63.4% #20 1,840 0 0
27 2008 17–10 63.0% #67 1,936 2 26 2006 30–15 66.7% #19 1,865 0 1
28 2009 33–19 63.5% #22 1,956 2 27 2007 27–21 56.2% #30 1,863 0 2
29 2010 18–11 62.1% #54 1,907 2 28 2008 31–23 57.4% #27 1,837 0 2
30 2011 8–9 47.1% #186 1,817 2 28 2009 44–19 69.8% #12 2,010 0 4
31 2012 13–11 54.2% #83 1,867 2 28 2010 17–15 53.1% #62 1,872 0 4
32 2013 22–18 55.0% #60 1,884 2 28 2011 30–24 55.6% #28 1,880 0 5
33 2014 19–15 55.9% #50 1,841 2 30 2012 21–19 52.5% #31 1,930 0 5
34 2015 3–9 25.0% #307 1,715 2 30 2013 14–16 46.7% #44 1,828 0 5
35 2016 1–1 50.0% #633 1,727 2 30 2014 16–17 48.5% #68 1,801 0 5
36 — — — — — — — 2015 7–10 41.2% #197 1,766 0 5
37 — — — — — — — 2016 10–11 47.6% #107 1,866 0 5
38 — — — — — — — 2017 3–2 60.0% #354 1,900 0 5