H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Lleyton Hewitt vs Robin Soderling H2H: 2-2

Lleyton Hewitt and Robin Soderling are tied 2–2 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Lleyton Hewitt leads 2–1 on hard courts, while Robin Soderling leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Robin Soderling won the 2011 Wimbledon second round 6-7(5) 3-6 7-5 6-4 6-4.

AUS Age 45 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
2 2
4 main draw meetings
SWE Age 41 Right-Handed 193 cm / 6'4"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jun 23, 2011* Wimbledon Grand Slam R64 Grass Robin Soderling #5 6-7(5) 3-6 7-5 6-4 6-4 Lleyton Hewitt #130 Match data
Aug 18, 2010* Cincinnati Masters Masters 1000 R32 Hard Robin Soderling #5 4-6 6-3 7-5 Lleyton Hewitt #30 Match data
Aug 18, 2009* Cincinnati Masters Masters 1000 R64 Hard Lleyton Hewitt #42 3-6 7-6(8) 6-4 Robin Soderling #11 Match data
Mar 24, 2004* Miami Masters Masters 1000 R64 Hard Lleyton Hewitt #18 6-4 6-2 Robin Soderling #48 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Lleyton Hewitt #636 #1 5,205 2,159 564 241 70.1% 2 2 2 1 23 30
Robin Soderling #195 #4 6,055 2,172 285 166 63.2% 0 1 0 2 7 10

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Lleyton Hewitt Robin Soderling
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1997 0–1 0.0% #550 1,492 0 0 2001 1–1 50.0% #444 1,518 0 0
17 1998 10–9 52.6% #100 1,614 0 1 2002 1–5 16.7% #163 1,554 0 0
18 1999 40–18 69.0% #25 1,853 0 2 2003 10–6 62.5% #60 1,728 0 0
19 2000 53–15 77.9% #7 1,993 0 6 2004 31–26 54.4% #34 1,824 0 1
20 2001 71–15 82.6% #1 2,116 1 12 2005 16–18 47.1% #77 1,737 0 2
21 2002 61–16 79.2% #1 2,062 2 17 2006 33–22 60.0% #25 1,823 0 2
22 2003 29–10 74.4% #17 1,939 2 19 2007 22–15 59.5% #41 1,831 0 2
23 2004 64–16 80.0% #3 2,076 2 23 2008 40–19 67.8% #17 1,959 0 3
24 2005 36–9 80.0% #4 2,092 2 24 2009 44–23 65.7% #8 2,070 0 4
25 2006 32–14 69.6% #20 1,964 2 25 2010 53–22 70.7% #5 2,118 0 6
26 2007 34–15 69.4% #21 1,925 2 26 2011 34–9 79.1% #13 2,127 0 10
27 2008 17–10 63.0% #67 1,936 2 26
28 2009 33–19 63.5% #22 1,956 2 27
29 2010 18–11 62.1% #54 1,907 2 28
30 2011 8–9 47.1% #186 1,817 2 28
31 2012 13–11 54.2% #83 1,867 2 28
32 2013 22–18 55.0% #60 1,884 2 28
33 2014 19–15 55.9% #50 1,841 2 30
34 2015 3–9 25.0% #307 1,715 2 30
35 2016 1–1 50.0% #633 1,727 2 30