H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 19:16 UTC

Lleyton Hewitt vs Sebastien Lareau H2H: 1-1

Lleyton Hewitt and Sebastien Lareau are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Sebastien Lareau leads 1–0 on grass, while Lleyton Hewitt leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Lleyton Hewitt won the 2001 San Jose third round 6-3 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Lleyton Hewitt
AUS Age 45 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
1 – 1
2 main draw meetings
Sebastien Lareau
CAN Age 53 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Mar 1, 2001* San Jose ATP 250 R32 Hard Lleyton Hewitt #6 6-3 6-1 Sebastien Lareau #94 Match data
Jun 10, 1998* Queen's Club ATP 250 R64 Grass Sebastien Lareau #120 3-6 7-6(6) 6-4 Lleyton Hewitt #165 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Lleyton Hewitt #636 #1 5,205 2,159 564 241 70.1% 2 2 2 1 23 30
Sebastien Lareau #1,018 #76 622 1,719 82 120 40.6% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Lleyton Hewitt Sebastien Lareau
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1997 0–1 0.0% #550 1,492 0 0 1989 0–1 0.0% #1015 1,493 0 0
17 1998 10–9 52.6% #100 1,614 0 1 — — — — — — —
18 1999 40–18 69.0% #25 1,853 0 2 1991 1–1 50.0% #349 1,505 0 0
19 2000 53–15 77.9% #7 1,993 0 6 1992 1–2 33.3% #197 1,501 0 0
20 2001 71–15 82.6% #1 2,116 1 12 1993 2–3 40.0% #131 1,531 0 0
21 2002 61–16 79.2% #1 2,062 2 17 1994 3–13 18.8% #119 1,482 0 0
22 2003 29–10 74.4% #17 1,939 2 19 1995 12–17 41.4% #136 1,567 0 0
23 2004 64–16 80.0% #3 2,076 2 23 1996 15–14 51.7% #105 1,679 0 0
24 2005 36–9 80.0% #4 2,092 2 24 1997 8–15 34.8% #187 1,591 0 0
25 2006 32–14 69.6% #20 1,964 2 25 1998 19–19 50.0% #79 1,657 0 0
26 2007 34–15 69.4% #21 1,925 2 26 1999 12–18 40.0% #102 1,616 0 0
27 2008 17–10 63.0% #67 1,936 2 26 2000 4–10 28.6% #124 1,586 0 0
28 2009 33–19 63.5% #22 1,956 2 27 2001 5–7 41.7% #229 1,516 0 0
29 2010 18–11 62.1% #54 1,907 2 28 — — — — — — —
30 2011 8–9 47.1% #186 1,817 2 28 — — — — — — —
31 2012 13–11 54.2% #83 1,867 2 28 — — — — — — —
32 2013 22–18 55.0% #60 1,884 2 28 — — — — — — —
33 2014 19–15 55.9% #50 1,841 2 30 — — — — — — —
34 2015 3–9 25.0% #307 1,715 2 30 — — — — — — —
35 2016 1–1 50.0% #633 1,727 2 30 — — — — — — —