H2H data updated: 2026-07-26 01:16 UTC
Lleyton Hewitt vs Sergiy Stakhovsky H2H: 1-0
Lleyton Hewitt holds a 1–0 lead over Sergiy Stakhovsky in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Lleyton Hewitt leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Lleyton Hewitt won the 2012 London Olympics second round 6-3 4-6 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
AUS
Age 45
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
UKR
Right-Handed
193 cm / 6'4"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 30, 2012* | London Olympics | Olympics | R64 | Grass | Lleyton Hewitt | 6-3 4-6 6-3 | Sergiy Stakhovsky | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lleyton Hewitt | #636 | #1 | 5,205 | 2,160 | 567 | 244 | 69.9% | 2 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 23 | 30 |
| Sergiy Stakhovsky | #678 | #31 | 1,263 | 1,838 | 145 | 196 | 42.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Lleyton Hewitt | Sergiy Stakhovsky | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1997 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #550 | 1,493 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #335 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 |
| 1998 | 10–9 | 52.6% | #100 | 1,615 | 0 | 1 | 2005 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #184 | 1,527 | 0 | 0 |
| 1999 | 40–18 | 69.0% | #25 | 1,854 | 0 | 2 | 2006 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #195 | 1,525 | 0 | 0 |
| 2000 | 53–16 | 76.8% | #7 | 1,980 | 0 | 6 | 2007 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #199 | 1,509 | 0 | 0 |
| 2001 | 71–15 | 82.6% | #1 | 2,116 | 1 | 12 | 2008 | 5–4 | 55.6% | #92 | 1,615 | 0 | 1 |
| 2002 | 61–16 | 79.2% | #1 | 2,065 | 2 | 17 | 2009 | 14–13 | 51.9% | #60 | 1,751 | 0 | 2 |
| 2003 | 29–10 | 74.4% | #17 | 1,939 | 2 | 19 | 2010 | 24–24 | 50.0% | #46 | 1,743 | 0 | 4 |
| 2004 | 64–16 | 80.0% | #3 | 2,073 | 2 | 23 | 2011 | 22–26 | 45.8% | #62 | 1,707 | 0 | 4 |
| 2005 | 36–9 | 80.0% | #4 | 2,114 | 2 | 24 | 2012 | 13–27 | 32.5% | #103 | 1,737 | 0 | 4 |
| 2006 | 32–14 | 69.6% | #20 | 1,971 | 2 | 25 | 2013 | 10–15 | 40.0% | #98 | 1,678 | 0 | 4 |
| 2007 | 34–15 | 69.4% | #21 | 1,919 | 2 | 26 | 2014 | 15–19 | 44.1% | #58 | 1,685 | 0 | 4 |
| 2008 | 18–11 | 62.1% | #67 | 1,936 | 2 | 26 | 2015 | 20–25 | 44.4% | #62 | 1,715 | 0 | 4 |
| 2009 | 33–19 | 63.5% | #22 | 1,959 | 2 | 27 | 2016 | 6–13 | 31.6% | #109 | 1,693 | 0 | 4 |
| 2010 | 18–11 | 62.1% | #54 | 1,909 | 2 | 28 | 2017 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #122 | 1,727 | 0 | 4 |
| 2011 | 8–9 | 47.1% | #186 | 1,818 | 2 | 28 | 2018 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #134 | 1,649 | 0 | 4 |
| 2012 | 15–12 | 55.6% | #83 | 1,884 | 2 | 28 | 2019 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #150 | 1,576 | 0 | 4 |
| 2013 | 22–18 | 55.0% | #60 | 1,888 | 2 | 28 | 2020 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #202 | 1,568 | 0 | 4 |
| 2014 | 19–15 | 55.9% | #50 | 1,842 | 2 | 30 | 2021 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #220 | 1,529 | 0 | 4 |
| 2015 | 3–9 | 25.0% | #307 | 1,714 | 2 | 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2016 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #633 | 1,727 | 2 | 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |