H2H data updated: 2026-09-03 00:00 UTC

Lleyton Hewitt vs Taylor Dent H2H: 5-1

Lleyton Hewitt holds a 5–1 lead over Taylor Dent in their ATP head-to-head. Across 6 main-draw meetings, Lleyton Hewitt leads 3–1 on hard courts and 2–0 on grass. Most recently, Lleyton Hewitt won the 2005 US Open round of 32 6-3 3-6 6-7(2) 6-2 7-5.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Lleyton Hewitt
AUS Age 45 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
5 – 1
6 main draw meetings
Taylor Dent
USA Age 45 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Lleyton Hewitt #4 6-3 3-6 6-7(2) 6-2 7-5 Taylor Dent #27 Match data Sep 4, 2005* R32 US Open Grand Slam Hard
Lleyton Hewitt #2 6-4 6-4 6-7(7) 6-3 Taylor Dent #30 Match data Jun 29, 2005* R16 Wimbledon Grand Slam Grass
Taylor Dent #32 7-6(4) 6-3 Lleyton Hewitt #3 Match data Jan 8, 2005* QF Adelaide International ATP International Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Hard
Lleyton Hewitt #1 6-2 6-4 Taylor Dent #44 Match data Mar 8, 2003* SF Scottsdale ATP International Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Hard
Lleyton Hewitt #4 6-2 7-6(3) Taylor Dent #127 Match data Aug 16, 2001* R32 Indianapolis ATP International Series Gold → modern equivalent ATP 500 Hard
Lleyton Hewitt #5 1-6 7-5 6-3 6-7(2) 6-3 Taylor Dent #143 Match data Jun 29, 2001* R64 Wimbledon Grand Slam Grass

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Lleyton Hewitt #636 #1 5,205 2,160 567 244 69.9% 2 2 2 2 22 30
Taylor Dent #979 #21 1,345 1,910 152 140 52.1% 0 0 0 1 3 4

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Lleyton Hewitt Taylor Dent
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1997 0–1 0.0% — 1,493 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 1998 10–9 52.6% #100 1,615 0 1 1998 1–3 25.0% #410 1,493 0 0
18 1999 40–18 69.0% #25 1,854 0 2 1999 0–2 0.0% #276 1,464 0 0
19 2000 53–16 76.8% #7 1,980 0 6 2000 3–7 30.0% #181 1,529 0 0
20 2001 71–15 82.6% #1 2,116 1 12 2001 10–13 43.5% #124 1,628 0 0
21 2002 61–16 79.2% #1 2,066 2 17 2002 20–17 54.1% #57 1,688 0 1
22 2003 29–10 74.4% #17 1,939 2 19 2003 28–12 70.0% #33 1,889 0 4
23 2004 64–16 80.0% #3 2,073 2 23 2004 32–25 56.1% #32 1,759 0 4
24 2005 36–9 80.0% #4 2,114 2 24 2005 33–21 61.1% #29 1,786 0 4
25 2006 32–14 69.6% #20 1,971 2 25 2006 1–4 20.0% #574 1,715 0 4
26 2007 34–15 69.4% #21 1,919 2 26 — — — — — — —
27 2008 18–11 62.1% #67 1,936 2 26 2008 0–2 0.0% #865 1,673 0 4
28 2009 33–19 63.5% #22 1,959 2 27 2009 12–15 44.4% #76 1,731 0 4
29 2010 18–11 62.1% #54 1,909 2 28 2010 12–19 38.7% #118 1,777 0 4
30 2011 8–9 47.1% #186 1,818 2 28 — — — — — — —
31 2012 15–12 55.6% #83 1,884 2 28 — — — — — — —
32 2013 22–18 55.0% #60 1,889 2 28 — — — — — — —
33 2014 19–15 55.9% #50 1,841 2 30 — — — — — — —
34 2015 3–9 25.0% #307 1,714 2 30 — — — — — — —
35 2016 1–1 50.0% #633 1,727 2 30 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Lleyton Hewitt Taylor Dent
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 1997 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1998 7 6 13 53.8% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% 2 1 3 66.7% 1998 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1999 20 10 30 66.7% 6 3 9 66.7% 8 3 11 72.7% 6 2 8 75.0% 1999 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2000 37 11 48 77.1% 8 3 11 72.7% 5 1 6 83.3% 3 1 4 75.0% 2000 3 6 9 33.3% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
20 2001 48 10 58 82.8% 10 3 13 76.9% 13 1 14 92.9% 0 1 1 0.0% 2001 8 10 18 44.4% — — — — 2 3 5 40.0% — — — —
21 2002 33 9 42 78.6% 10 5 15 66.7% 14 1 15 93.3% 4 1 5 80.0% 2002 13 13 26 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 7 3 10 70.0% — — — —
22 2003 23 6 29 79.3% 4 2 6 66.7% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 2003 18 5 23 78.3% 0 4 4 0.0% 5 3 8 62.5% 5 0 5 100.0%
23 2004 44 9 53 83.0% 11 4 15 73.3% 7 2 9 77.8% 2 1 3 66.7% 2004 25 16 41 61.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 5 3 8 62.5% 0 2 2 0.0%
24 2005 29 7 36 80.6% — — — — 7 2 9 77.8% — — — — 2005 24 15 39 61.5% — — — — 8 4 12 66.7% 1 2 3 33.3%
25 2006 20 11 31 64.5% 3 2 5 60.0% 9 1 10 90.0% — — — — 2006 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 2007 21 9 30 70.0% 10 4 14 71.4% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 2008 10 8 18 55.6% 2 1 3 66.7% 6 2 8 75.0% — — — — 2008 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
28 2009 18 14 32 56.3% 9 3 12 75.0% 6 2 8 75.0% — — — — 2009 10 12 22 45.5% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
29 2010 5 6 11 45.5% 5 4 9 55.6% 8 1 9 88.9% — — — — 2010 10 14 24 41.7% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — —
30 2011 5 6 11 45.5% — — — — 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2012 9 7 16 56.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 6 4 10 60.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2013 13 12 25 52.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 9 3 12 75.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2014 11 9 20 55.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 7 2 9 77.8% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2015 3 5 8 37.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2016 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 357 157 514 69.5% 79 43 122 64.8% 114 37 151 75.5% 17 7 24 70.8% — 113 101 214 52.8% 4 12 16 25.0% 29 23 52 55.8% 6 4 10 60.0%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 753/811 of Lleyton Hewitt's and 277/292 of Taylor Dent's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Lleyton Hewitt Taylor Dent
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
16 1997 1/1 4.0 3.0 55.6% 56.7% 43.8% 58.8% 50.0% 50.9% 30.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
17 1998 18/19 2.8 4.1 54.8% 68.2% 51.4% 54.4% 39.1% 60.4% 40.6% 1998 4/4 5.8 5.5 51.6% 71.1% 47.8% 52.0% 15.8% 60.1% 32.5%
18 1999 51/58 3.9 2.2 59.1% 71.5% 56.2% 61.1% 49.8% 65.1% 42.8% 1999 2/2 4.5 4.0 52.4% 58.4% 52.8% 38.6% 50.0% 55.6% 16.3%
19 2000 56/69 6.3 3.6 53.9% 75.5% 55.3% 64.9% 51.6% 66.2% 41.8% 2000 9/10 7.7 5.7 55.0% 73.1% 47.0% 59.7% 32.1% 61.8% 32.4%
20 2001 72/86 5.5 3.6 53.4% 75.7% 56.2% 60.8% 48.0% 66.5% 44.2% 2001 22/23 7.2 5.5 53.3% 77.2% 48.9% 52.3% 35.8% 63.6% 37.4%
21 2002 62/77 7.2 4.0 51.4% 74.9% 54.3% 59.2% 42.9% 64.7% 43.4% 2002 31/37 7.0 4.4 59.7% 72.5% 53.0% 54.4% 47.5% 64.5% 38.6%
22 2003 39/39 6.5 4.1 51.7% 77.0% 55.0% 62.9% 47.7% 66.2% 44.4% 2003 39/40 8.5 6.3 55.1% 78.7% 52.1% 64.4% 46.6% 66.7% 40.0%
23 2004 80/80 6.3 3.6 54.2% 76.8% 55.1% 64.6% 47.8% 66.9% 42.7% 2004 51/57 6.4 5.7 59.9% 73.2% 49.5% 60.1% 47.7% 63.7% 37.7%
24 2005 43/45 9.2 3.8 56.4% 78.8% 54.0% 62.8% 45.7% 68.1% 41.3% 2005 54/54 8.1 6.6 54.3% 78.7% 49.9% 60.4% 40.5% 65.7% 38.2%
25 2006 46/46 7.3 3.8 55.1% 71.5% 52.6% 51.5% 46.1% 63.0% 43.0% 2006 5/5 7.8 5.0 59.6% 76.5% 44.0% 50.7% 37.9% 63.6% 32.9%
26 2007 48/49 7.6 3.3 53.6% 76.5% 54.8% 59.0% 51.1% 66.2% 40.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
27 2008 27/29 8.2 3.0 54.5% 76.2% 57.4% 57.7% 37.6% 67.8% 42.0% 2008 2/2 6.0 7.5 60.2% 69.7% 44.4% 39.8% 51.1% 59.6% 35.2%
28 2009 52/52 6.5 3.7 53.3% 76.0% 53.3% 62.4% 41.5% 65.5% 41.5% 2009 27/27 7.9 5.9 58.3% 77.2% 46.3% 56.8% 43.8% 64.1% 34.7%
29 2010 29/29 6.3 2.9 56.7% 74.5% 52.0% 56.1% 55.1% 64.6% 42.0% 2010 31/31 7.8 5.9 56.0% 74.5% 46.9% 59.1% 42.8% 62.3% 34.6%
30 2011 17/17 6.6 3.8 56.3% 72.4% 48.7% 54.8% 43.7% 61.8% 37.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
31 2012 24/27 5.8 4.2 52.4% 70.5% 47.8% 57.9% 41.3% 59.7% 37.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
32 2013 40/40 6.2 4.0 51.1% 70.1% 51.9% 59.4% 46.6% 61.1% 39.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
33 2014 34/34 4.9 4.8 53.5% 72.2% 49.7% 59.4% 44.0% 61.3% 39.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
34 2015 12/12 6.8 4.8 54.4% 68.6% 51.2% 55.9% 42.4% 60.7% 37.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
35 2016 2/2 6.0 4.0 54.8% 71.6% 47.1% 70.8% 22.9% 60.4% 38.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 753/811 6.4 3.7 54.1% 74.4% 53.8% 60.2% 46.4% 64.9% 41.8% — 277/292 7.5 5.8 56.6% 75.7% 49.5% 58.5% 43.1% 64.3% 37.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Lleyton Hewitt Taylor Dent
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 1997 1493 104.6 +1.87 +1.38 0.627 41.7% — — — 0.0% -2.67 — — — -0.13 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1998 1615 137.2 -0.46 +2.56 1.025 50.0% +26 — -8 52.9% +0.21 5–6 (45%) 7–4 (64%) — -0.28 1998 1493 99.7 -1.26 -1.61 0.814 45.7% +33 — — 12.5% -2.75 0–1 1–1 — +0.32
18 1999 1854 154.0 +2.80 +4.93 1.226 53.8% -9 -254 -123 64.6% +1.10 12–9 (57%) 8–10 (44%) — -2.41 1999 1465 96.9 -3.78 -2.62 0.368 39.5% — — — 0.0% -3.20 — — — +0.21
19 2000 1980 166.2 +3.71 +4.99 1.237 53.9% +30 -228 -146 69.5% +1.24 14–6 (70%) 11–14 (44%) — -2.06 2000 1529 121.3 +0.19 -0.70 0.847 47.1% -45 — — 30.0% -0.75 1–2 (33%) 0–4 (0%) — -0.36
20 2001 2117 162.4 +4.29 +6.67 1.319 54.9% +8 -224 -121 72.0% +1.50 24–9 (73%) 13–9 (59%) — +1.18 2001 1629 135.5 +1.76 +1.11 1.026 50.3% -54 — +38 47.4% -0.09 2–4 (33%) 6–5 (55%) — -0.88
21 2002 2066 162.1 +3.20 +6.04 1.230 53.8% +19 -160 +114 70.4% +1.26 18–1 (95%) 18–12 (60%) — -1.87 2002 1689 132.9 +1.18 +0.85 1.087 51.5% -39 — +71 56.8% +0.38 3–7 (30%) 9–8 (53%) — +2.03
22 2003 1940 148.3 +2.77 +6.39 1.313 54.9% +95 -50 +219 66.4% +1.31 8–5 (62%) 8–9 (47%) — +1.40 2003 1889 141.1 +3.77 +2.59 1.202 53.1% +34 -446 -112 68.5% +0.98 4–3 (57%) 15–8 (65%) — -0.53
23 2004 2074 161.5 +4.35 +6.35 1.292 54.5% +33 -141 +46 72.4% +1.40 13–6 (68%) 17–7 (71%) — -2.32 2004 1759 136.0 +0.62 +1.01 1.040 50.8% +38 -302 +19 53.7% +0.19 9–7 (56%) 12–13 (48%) — +1.76
24 2005 2115 161.5 +4.84 +5.29 1.294 54.3% +42 — +76 69.3% +1.35 12–0 (100%) 14–10 (58%) — -1.18 2005 1786 148.2 +2.55 +1.76 1.112 51.9% +20 — +62 61.1% +0.69 7–6 (54%) 14–9 (61%) — +0.10
25 2006 1972 142.5 +1.60 +4.43 1.161 52.6% -20 -18 +235 63.1% +0.95 13–5 (72%) 9–8 (53%) — +0.55 2006 1715 112.2 +0.47 -2.19 0.903 47.7% 0 — — 36.4% -0.55 0–2 0–3 (0%) — -0.05
26 2007 1919 154.1 +2.55 +3.26 1.191 53.1% -12 +96 +217 64.8% +0.95 7–5 (58%) 7–13 (35%) — +1.23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 2008 1937 143.9 +3.50 +4.91 1.303 53.9% -73 +79 +208 61.5% +1.03 2–3 (40%) 4–10 (29%) — -1.01 2008 1673 99.9 -1.58 -0.41 0.872 47.8% — — — 33.3% -1.00 0–2 0–1 — +0.27
28 2009 1960 156.8 +1.58 +4.92 1.202 53.0% -71 +63 +224 61.0% +0.81 11–9 (55%) 8–12 (40%) — -1.75 2009 1731 134.4 -0.29 -1.60 0.968 49.6% +28 — +79 45.8% -0.22 4–5 (44%) 8–4 (67%) — +1.07
29 2010 1909 143.7 +1.71 +4.35 1.187 53.0% -77 +73 +318 56.2% +0.49 6–3 (67%) 6–2 (75%) — -0.34 2010 1777 141.2 -0.60 -0.78 0.919 48.7% +7 -290 +11 42.3% -0.45 4–7 (36%) 6–5 (55%) — -1.86
30 2011 1819 131.8 -1.17 +0.07 0.976 49.8% -42 — +318 52.3% +0.32 2–4 (33%) 3–5 (38%) — -0.11 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2012 1884 145.7 -2.14 +1.74 0.935 48.9% 0 — +205 50.0% -0.29 6–3 (67%) 4–4 (50%) — -0.31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2013 1889 147.2 -2.06 +2.77 1.005 50.2% -35 -33 +197 51.8% +0.17 12–8 (60%) 9–7 (56%) — -1.05 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2014 1842 149.1 -2.59 +3.22 1.032 50.5% +15 -61 +258 52.3% +0.10 9–4 (69%) 4–7 (36%) — -0.31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2015 1715 118.7 -3.34 +0.79 0.958 49.2% +73 — +259 40.5% -0.65 0–7 (0%) 2–1 (67%) — +0.96 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2016 1727 113.5 +0.52 +0.37 0.970 49.3% — — — 50.0% -0.17 — 1–0 — +0.04 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2160 162.0 +2.20 +4.74 1.192 53.1% +6 -84 +125 63.9% +0.95 174–93 (65%) 153–144 (52%) 100.9 -1.21 — 1911 143.3 +1.28 +0.73 1.037 50.7% +9 -344 +24 52.8% +0.16 34–46 (43%) 71–61 (54%) 97.1 +0.72

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.