H2H data updated: 2026-09-03 00:00 UTC

Lleyton Hewitt vs Tim Henman H2H: 9-1

Lleyton Hewitt holds a 9–1 lead over Tim Henman in their ATP head-to-head. Across 10 main-draw meetings, Lleyton Hewitt leads 5–1 on hard courts and 4–0 on grass. Most recently, Lleyton Hewitt won the 2006 Queen's Club Championships semifinal 6-3 3-6 6-2.

AUS Age 45 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
9 1
10 main draw meetings
GBR Age 51 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Lleyton Hewitt #13 6-3 3-6 6-2 Tim Henman #76 Match data Jun 17, 2006* SF Queen's Club Championships ATP International Series modern equivalent ATP 250 Grass
Tim Henman #56 7-6(5) 6-3 Lleyton Hewitt #14 Match data Mar 22, 2006* R64 Miami Open Masters 1000 Hard
Lleyton Hewitt #10 6-1 6-4 Tim Henman #6 Match data Aug 7, 2004* R16 Cincinnati Open Masters 1000 Hard
Lleyton Hewitt #13 6-3 6-3 Tim Henman #11 Match data Feb 21, 2004* SF ABN AMRO Open International Series Gold modern equivalent ATP 500 Hard
Lleyton Hewitt #1 7-5 6-1 7-5 Tim Henman #5 Match data Jul 7, 2002* SF Wimbledon Grand Slam Grass
Lleyton Hewitt #1 4-6 6-1 6-4 Tim Henman #5 Match data Jun 16, 2002* F Queen's Club Championships ATP International Series modern equivalent ATP 250 Grass
Lleyton Hewitt #1 6-1 6-2 Tim Henman #6 Match data Mar 18, 2002* F Indian Wells Open Masters 1000 Hard
Lleyton Hewitt #6 7-6(3) 7-6(3) Tim Henman #11 Match data Jun 17, 2001* F Queen's Club Championships ATP International Series modern equivalent ATP 250 Grass
Lleyton Hewitt #8 3-6 6-3 6-4 Tim Henman #10 Match data Nov 4, 2000* R16 Stuttgart Masters Masters 1000 Hard
Lleyton Hewitt #18 6-4 7-6(2) Tim Henman #11 Match data Mar 12, 2000* F Scottsdale ATP International Series modern equivalent ATP 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Lleyton Hewitt #636 #1 5,205 2,160 567 244 69.9% 2 2 2 2 22 30
Tim Henman #615 #4 2,826 2,026 469 263 64.1% 0 1 0 1 9 11

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Lleyton Hewitt Tim Henman
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1997 0–1 0.0% 1,493 0 0
17 1998 10–9 52.6% #100 1,615 0 1
18 1999 40–18 69.0% #25 1,854 0 2
19 2000 53–16 76.8% #7 1,980 0 6 1994 3–5 37.5% #167 1,513 0 0
20 2001 71–15 82.6% #1 2,116 1 12 1995 7–7 50.0% #95 1,571 0 0
21 2002 61–16 79.2% #1 2,066 2 17 1996 38–25 60.3% #29 1,811 0 0
22 2003 29–10 74.4% #17 1,939 2 19 1997 47–23 67.1% #17 1,895 0 2
23 2004 64–16 80.0% #3 2,073 2 23 1998 55–29 65.5% #7 1,960 0 4
24 2005 36–9 80.0% #4 2,114 2 24 1999 41–25 62.1% #12 1,786 0 4
25 2006 32–14 69.6% #20 1,971 2 25 2000 55–24 69.6% #10 1,939 0 6
26 2007 34–15 69.4% #21 1,919 2 26 2001 49–20 71.0% #9 1,922 0 8
27 2008 18–11 62.1% #67 1,936 2 26 2002 45–18 71.4% #8 1,888 0 9
28 2009 33–19 63.5% #22 1,959 2 27 2003 30–16 65.2% #15 1,971 0 11
29 2010 18–11 62.1% #54 1,909 2 28 2004 41–21 66.1% #6 1,914 0 11
30 2011 8–9 47.1% #186 1,818 2 28 2005 23–18 56.1% #36 1,746 0 11
31 2012 15–12 55.6% #83 1,884 2 28 2006 31–20 60.8% #39 1,867 0 11
32 2013 22–18 55.0% #60 1,889 2 28 2007 4–12 25.0% #292 1,683 0 11
33 2014 19–15 55.9% #50 1,841 2 30
34 2015 3–9 25.0% #307 1,714 2 30
35 2016 1–1 50.0% #633 1,727 2 30

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Lleyton Hewitt Tim Henman
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 1997 0 1 1 0.0%
17 1998 7 6 13 53.8% 1 2 3 33.3% 2 1 3 66.7%
18 1999 20 10 30 66.7% 6 3 9 66.7% 8 3 11 72.7% 6 2 8 75.0%
19 2000 37 11 48 77.1% 8 3 11 72.7% 5 1 6 83.3% 3 1 4 75.0% 1994 2 2 4 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0%
20 2001 48 10 58 82.8% 10 3 13 76.9% 13 1 14 92.9% 0 1 1 0.0% 1995 2 2 4 50.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 1 2 3 33.3%
21 2002 33 9 42 78.6% 10 5 15 66.7% 14 1 15 93.3% 4 1 5 80.0% 1996 14 12 26 53.8% 0 1 1 0.0% 7 3 10 70.0% 17 9 26 65.4%
22 2003 23 6 29 79.3% 4 2 6 66.7% 2 2 4 50.0% 1997 27 11 38 71.1% 1 3 4 25.0% 8 3 11 72.7% 11 6 17 64.7%
23 2004 44 9 53 83.0% 11 4 15 73.3% 7 2 9 77.8% 2 1 3 66.7% 1998 40 18 58 69.0% 3 5 8 37.5% 7 2 9 77.8% 5 4 9 55.6%
24 2005 29 7 36 80.6% 7 2 9 77.8% 1999 16 14 30 53.3% 7 5 12 58.3% 9 2 11 81.8% 9 4 13 69.2%
25 2006 20 11 31 64.5% 3 2 5 60.0% 9 1 10 90.0% 2000 41 14 55 74.5% 8 5 13 61.5% 3 3 6 50.0% 3 2 5 60.0%
26 2007 21 9 30 70.0% 10 4 14 71.4% 3 2 5 60.0% 2001 28 12 40 70.0% 7 5 12 58.3% 9 2 11 81.8% 5 1 6 83.3%
27 2008 10 8 18 55.6% 2 1 3 66.7% 6 2 8 75.0% 2002 27 10 37 73.0% 6 4 10 60.0% 9 2 11 81.8% 3 2 5 60.0%
28 2009 18 14 32 56.3% 9 3 12 75.0% 6 2 8 75.0% 2003 10 9 19 52.6% 5 4 9 55.6% 7 2 9 77.8% 8 1 9 88.9%
29 2010 5 6 11 45.5% 5 4 9 55.6% 8 1 9 88.9% 2004 23 13 36 63.9% 11 4 15 73.3% 4 2 6 66.7% 3 2 5 60.0%
30 2011 5 6 11 45.5% 3 3 6 50.0% 2005 15 11 26 57.7% 5 4 9 55.6% 3 2 5 60.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
31 2012 9 7 16 56.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 6 4 10 60.0% 2006 19 13 32 59.4% 3 3 6 50.0% 5 2 7 71.4% 4 2 6 66.7%
32 2013 13 12 25 52.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 9 3 12 75.0% 2007 2 6 8 25.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0%
33 2014 11 9 20 55.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 7 2 9 77.8%
34 2015 3 5 8 37.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0%
35 2016 1 1 2 50.0%
Career 357 157 514 69.5% 79 43 122 64.8% 114 37 151 75.5% 17 7 24 70.8% 266 147 413 64.4% 56 46 102 54.9% 78 34 112 69.6% 69 36 105 65.7%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 753/811 of Lleyton Hewitt's and 644/732 of Tim Henman's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Lleyton Hewitt Tim Henman
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
16 1997 1/1 4.0 3.0 55.6% 56.7% 43.8% 58.8% 50.0% 50.9% 30.8% —/—
17 1998 18/19 2.8 4.1 54.8% 68.2% 51.4% 54.4% 39.1% 60.4% 40.6% —/—
18 1999 51/58 3.9 2.2 59.1% 71.5% 56.2% 61.1% 49.8% 65.1% 42.8% —/—
19 2000 56/69 6.3 3.6 53.9% 75.5% 55.3% 64.9% 51.6% 66.2% 41.8% 1994 5/8 3.0 2.6 62.7% 65.7% 41.8% 48.7% 36.9% 56.9% 33.4%
20 2001 72/86 5.5 3.6 53.4% 75.7% 56.2% 60.8% 48.0% 66.5% 44.2% 1995 11/14 3.7 5.0 55.9% 69.5% 47.7% 53.7% 54.6% 60.1% 34.7%
21 2002 62/77 7.2 4.0 51.4% 74.9% 54.3% 59.2% 42.9% 64.7% 43.4% 1996 50/63 7.1 3.7 56.7% 73.9% 51.4% 58.8% 39.0% 64.4% 36.7%
22 2003 39/39 6.5 4.1 51.7% 77.0% 55.0% 62.9% 47.7% 66.2% 44.4% 1997 63/70 8.3 4.8 51.2% 80.7% 50.4% 61.5% 38.9% 65.8% 38.3%
23 2004 80/80 6.3 3.6 54.2% 76.8% 55.1% 64.6% 47.8% 66.9% 42.7% 1998 71/84 7.2 4.1 52.9% 77.8% 50.0% 54.0% 45.5% 64.6% 39.3%
24 2005 43/45 9.2 3.8 56.4% 78.8% 54.0% 62.8% 45.7% 68.1% 41.3% 1999 57/66 7.0 3.8 54.9% 76.7% 50.5% 62.0% 41.3% 64.8% 40.2%
25 2006 46/46 7.3 3.8 55.1% 71.5% 52.6% 51.5% 46.1% 63.0% 43.0% 2000 62/79 7.0 4.1 55.2% 77.1% 50.9% 68.9% 40.4% 65.4% 41.2%
26 2007 48/49 7.6 3.3 53.6% 76.5% 54.8% 59.0% 51.1% 66.2% 40.3% 2001 58/69 4.7 3.1 60.9% 74.3% 53.1% 61.1% 47.4% 66.2% 42.8%
27 2008 27/29 8.2 3.0 54.5% 76.2% 57.4% 57.7% 37.6% 67.8% 42.0% 2002 54/63 3.4 2.2 64.4% 70.8% 52.9% 63.3% 45.7% 64.3% 40.8%
28 2009 52/52 6.5 3.7 53.3% 76.0% 53.3% 62.4% 41.5% 65.5% 41.5% 2003 45/46 4.8 3.7 58.8% 72.7% 51.8% 59.3% 47.9% 64.1% 39.5%
29 2010 29/29 6.3 2.9 56.7% 74.5% 52.0% 56.1% 55.1% 64.6% 42.0% 2004 60/62 6.1 4.1 58.7% 74.2% 55.5% 59.4% 49.0% 66.6% 39.1%
30 2011 17/17 6.6 3.8 56.3% 72.4% 48.7% 54.8% 43.7% 61.8% 37.3% 2005 41/41 4.4 3.3 61.9% 73.8% 52.4% 62.5% 45.6% 65.7% 38.2%
31 2012 24/27 5.8 4.2 52.4% 70.5% 47.8% 57.9% 41.3% 59.7% 37.7% 2006 51/51 4.7 2.3 61.5% 71.5% 51.9% 59.0% 48.7% 63.8% 38.9%
32 2013 40/40 6.2 4.0 51.1% 70.1% 51.9% 59.4% 46.6% 61.1% 39.0% 2007 16/16 7.6 4.3 62.5% 69.6% 51.9% 65.9% 40.5% 62.9% 34.5%
33 2014 34/34 4.9 4.8 53.5% 72.2% 49.7% 59.4% 44.0% 61.3% 39.9% —/—
34 2015 12/12 6.8 4.8 54.4% 68.6% 51.2% 55.9% 42.4% 60.7% 37.7% —/—
35 2016 2/2 6.0 4.0 54.8% 71.6% 47.1% 70.8% 22.9% 60.4% 38.4% —/—
Career 753/811 6.4 3.7 54.1% 74.4% 53.8% 60.2% 46.4% 64.9% 41.8% 644/732 6.0 3.7 57.7% 74.8% 51.7% 60.7% 44.4% 64.9% 39.4%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Lleyton Hewitt Tim Henman
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 1997 1493 104.6 +1.87 +1.38 0.627 41.7% 0.0% -2.67 -0.13
17 1998 1615 137.2 -0.46 +2.56 1.025 50.0% +26 -8 52.9% +0.21 5–6 (45%) 7–4 (64%) -0.28
18 1999 1854 154.0 +2.80 +4.93 1.226 53.8% -9 -254 -123 64.6% +1.10 12–9 (57%) 8–10 (44%) -2.41
19 2000 1980 166.2 +3.71 +4.99 1.237 53.9% +30 -228 -146 69.5% +1.24 14–6 (70%) 11–14 (44%) -2.06 1994 1513 116.8 -1.59 -1.36 0.776 45.4% +47 +42 40.0% -1.00 1–1 2–0 -0.33
20 2001 2117 162.4 +4.29 +6.67 1.319 54.9% +8 -224 -121 72.0% +1.50 24–9 (73%) 13–9 (59%) +1.18 1995 1572 115.6 -2.09 -1.97 0.869 47.8% 0 +26 45.7% -0.43 2–1 (67%) 4–4 (50%) -0.04
21 2002 2066 162.1 +3.20 +6.04 1.230 53.8% +19 -160 +114 70.4% +1.26 18–1 (95%) 18–12 (60%) -1.87 1996 1811 143.5 +1.77 -0.36 1.030 50.5% -28 -52 58.2% +0.39 8–11 (42%) 24–14 (63%) -0.81
22 2003 1940 148.3 +2.77 +6.39 1.313 54.9% +95 -50 +219 66.4% +1.31 8–5 (62%) 8–9 (47%) +1.40 1997 1896 147.8 +3.33 +0.92 1.120 51.9% 0 -414 -26 59.7% +0.52 17–9 (65%) 18–11 (62%) +0.85
23 2004 2074 161.5 +4.35 +6.35 1.292 54.5% +33 -141 +46 72.4% +1.40 13–6 (68%) 17–7 (71%) -2.32 1998 1961 159.5 +2.85 +2.23 1.107 52.0% -1 -493 +17 61.8% +0.65 17–12 (59%) 16–10 (62%) -1.62
24 2005 2115 161.5 +4.84 +5.29 1.294 54.3% +42 +76 69.3% +1.35 12–0 (100%) 14–10 (58%) -1.18 1999 1787 151.2 +2.50 +2.30 1.142 52.1% -11 -152 +243 58.8% +0.71 13–13 (50%) 14–16 (47%) +0.72
25 2006 1972 142.5 +1.60 +4.43 1.161 52.6% -20 -18 +235 63.1% +0.95 13–5 (72%) 9–8 (53%) +0.55 2000 1939 155.2 +3.31 +3.56 1.191 53.1% +29 -234 +63 66.7% +1.07 11–12 (48%) 17–10 (63%) +0.25
26 2007 1919 154.1 +2.55 +3.26 1.191 53.1% -12 +96 +217 64.8% +0.95 7–5 (58%) 7–13 (35%) +1.23 2001 1922 152.8 +3.40 +4.67 1.266 54.3% -2 -179 +132 67.0% +1.29 11–12 (48%) 17–14 (55%) +2.30
27 2008 1937 143.9 +3.50 +4.91 1.303 53.9% -73 +79 +208 61.5% +1.03 2–3 (40%) 4–10 (29%) -1.01 2002 1888 153.2 +2.14 +3.42 1.145 52.4% +19 -133 +186 66.3% +1.06 14–8 (64%) 9–15 (38%) +0.21
28 2009 1960 156.8 +1.58 +4.92 1.202 53.0% -71 +63 +224 61.0% +0.81 11–9 (55%) 8–12 (40%) -1.75 2003 1972 147.0 +1.73 +3.09 1.100 51.8% -9 -200 +151 60.0% +0.66 8–2 (80%) 10–8 (56%) -2.72
29 2010 1909 143.7 +1.71 +4.35 1.187 53.0% -77 +73 +318 56.2% +0.49 6–3 (67%) 6–2 (75%) -0.34 2004 1914 154.9 +3.57 +2.65 1.174 52.8% +17 -34 +142 60.8% +0.86 11–7 (61%) 12–18 (40%) +0.11
30 2011 1819 131.8 -1.17 +0.07 0.976 49.8% -42 +318 52.3% +0.32 2–4 (33%) 3–5 (38%) -0.11 2005 1746 146.2 +2.43 +1.53 1.114 51.8% +62 +91 +293 55.6% +0.50 6–8 (43%) 6–8 (43%) +0.77
31 2012 1884 145.7 -2.14 +1.74 0.935 48.9% 0 +205 50.0% -0.29 6–3 (67%) 4–4 (50%) -0.31 2006 1868 152.1 +1.77 +2.07 1.076 51.4% -18 -56 +205 59.5% +0.54 5–8 (38%) 10–7 (59%) -2.94
32 2013 1889 147.2 -2.06 +2.77 1.005 50.2% -35 -33 +197 51.8% +0.17 12–8 (60%) 9–7 (56%) -1.05 2007 1684 119.8 -0.80 -0.33 0.931 49.2% +55 +34 +277 40.0% -0.34 1–8 (11%) 2–6 (25%) +0.06
33 2014 1842 149.1 -2.59 +3.22 1.032 50.5% +15 -61 +258 52.3% +0.10 9–4 (69%) 4–7 (36%) -0.31
34 2015 1715 118.7 -3.34 +0.79 0.958 49.2% +73 +259 40.5% -0.65 0–7 (0%) 2–1 (67%) +0.96
35 2016 1727 113.5 +0.52 +0.37 0.970 49.3% 50.0% -0.17 1–0 +0.04
Career 2160 162.0 +2.20 +4.74 1.192 53.1% +6 -84 +125 63.9% +0.95 174–93 (65%) 153–144 (52%) 100.9 -1.21 2026 155.9 +2.48 +2.23 1.121 52.1% +5 -155 +114 60.6% +0.70 125–112 (53%) 161–141 (53%) 96.1 -0.44

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.