H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:16 UTC

Lleyton Hewitt vs Tim Henman H2H: 9-1

Lleyton Hewitt holds a 9–1 lead over Tim Henman in their ATP head-to-head. Across 10 main-draw meetings, Lleyton Hewitt leads 5–1 on hard courts and 4–0 on grass. Most recently, Lleyton Hewitt won the 2006 Queen's Club semifinal 6-3 3-6 6-2.

AUS Age 45 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
9 1
10 main draw meetings
GBR Age 51 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jun 17, 2006* Queen's Club ATP 250 SF Grass Lleyton Hewitt #13 6-3 3-6 6-2 Tim Henman #76 Match data
Mar 22, 2006* Miami Masters Masters 1000 R64 Hard Tim Henman #56 7-6(5) 6-3 Lleyton Hewitt #14 Match data
Aug 7, 2004* Cincinnati Masters Masters 1000 R16 Hard Lleyton Hewitt #10 6-1 6-4 Tim Henman #6 Match data
Feb 21, 2004* Rotterdam ATP 250 SF Hard Lleyton Hewitt #13 6-3 6-3 Tim Henman #11 Match data
Jul 7, 2002* Wimbledon Grand Slam SF Grass Lleyton Hewitt #1 7-5 6-1 7-5 Tim Henman #5 Match data
Jun 16, 2002* Queen's Club ATP 250 F Grass Lleyton Hewitt #1 4-6 6-1 6-4 Tim Henman #5 Match data
Mar 18, 2002* Indian Wells Masters Masters 1000 F Hard Lleyton Hewitt #1 6-1 6-2 Tim Henman #6 Match data
Jun 17, 2001* Queen's Club ATP 250 F Grass Lleyton Hewitt #6 7-6(3) 7-6(3) Tim Henman #11 Match data
Nov 4, 2000* Stuttgart Masters Masters 1000 R16 Hard Lleyton Hewitt #8 3-6 6-3 6-4 Tim Henman #10 Match data
Mar 12, 2000* Scottsdale ATP 250 F Hard Lleyton Hewitt #18 6-4 7-6(2) Tim Henman #11 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Lleyton Hewitt #636 #1 5,205 2,159 564 241 70.1% 2 2 2 1 23 30
Tim Henman #615 #4 2,826 2,027 468 260 64.3% 0 1 0 0 10 11

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Lleyton Hewitt Tim Henman
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1997 0–1 0.0% #550 1,492 0 0
17 1998 10–9 52.6% #100 1,614 0 1
18 1999 40–18 69.0% #25 1,853 0 2
19 2000 53–15 77.9% #7 1,993 0 6 1994 3–5 37.5% #167 1,513 0 0
20 2001 71–15 82.6% #1 2,116 1 12 1995 7–7 50.0% #95 1,584 0 0
21 2002 61–16 79.2% #1 2,062 2 17 1996 37–24 60.7% #29 1,821 0 0
22 2003 29–10 74.4% #17 1,939 2 19 1997 47–23 67.1% #17 1,895 0 2
23 2004 64–16 80.0% #3 2,076 2 23 1998 55–29 65.5% #7 1,960 0 4
24 2005 36–9 80.0% #4 2,092 2 24 1999 41–25 62.1% #12 1,785 0 4
25 2006 32–14 69.6% #20 1,964 2 25 2000 55–23 70.5% #10 1,953 0 6
26 2007 34–15 69.4% #21 1,925 2 26 2001 49–20 71.0% #9 1,924 0 8
27 2008 17–10 63.0% #67 1,936 2 26 2002 45–18 71.4% #8 1,867 0 9
28 2009 33–19 63.5% #22 1,956 2 27 2003 30–16 65.2% #15 1,970 0 11
29 2010 18–11 62.1% #54 1,907 2 28 2004 41–20 67.2% #6 1,926 0 11
30 2011 8–9 47.1% #186 1,817 2 28 2005 23–18 56.1% #36 1,746 0 11
31 2012 13–11 54.2% #83 1,867 2 28 2006 31–20 60.8% #39 1,868 0 11
32 2013 22–18 55.0% #60 1,884 2 28 2007 4–12 25.0% #292 1,684 0 11
33 2014 19–15 55.9% #50 1,841 2 30
34 2015 3–9 25.0% #307 1,715 2 30
35 2016 1–1 50.0% #633 1,727 2 30