H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC

Lleyton Hewitt vs Wayne Arthurs H2H: 4-0

Lleyton Hewitt holds a 4–0 lead over Wayne Arthurs in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Lleyton Hewitt leads 4–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Lleyton Hewitt won the 2006 San Jose quarterfinal 7-6(4) 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Lleyton Hewitt
AUS Age 45 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
4 – 0
4 main draw meetings
Wayne Arthurs
AUS Age 55 Left-Handed 190 cm / 6'3"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Feb 18, 2006* San Jose ATP 250 QF Hard Lleyton Hewitt #11 7-6(4) 6-2 Wayne Arthurs #94 Match data
Jan 11, 2001* Sydney ATP 250 R32 Hard Lleyton Hewitt #7 6-7(3) 7-6(5) 6-2 Wayne Arthurs #84 Match data
Jan 4, 2001* Adelaide ATP 250 R32 Hard Lleyton Hewitt #7 6-4 6-3 Wayne Arthurs #83 Match data
Sep 3, 1999* US Open Grand Slam R64 Hard Lleyton Hewitt #33 6-2 6-4 6-7(5) 6-4 Wayne Arthurs #91 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Lleyton Hewitt #636 #1 5,205 2,159 564 241 70.1% 2 2 2 1 23 30
Wayne Arthurs #368 #44 833 1,781 122 152 44.5% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Lleyton Hewitt Wayne Arthurs
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1997 0–1 0.0% #550 1,492 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 1998 10–9 52.6% #100 1,614 0 1 — — — — — — —
18 1999 40–18 69.0% #25 1,853 0 2 — — — — — — —
19 2000 53–15 77.9% #7 1,993 0 6 — — — — — — —
20 2001 71–15 82.6% #1 2,116 1 12 — — — — — — —
21 2002 61–16 79.2% #1 2,062 2 17 — — — — — — —
22 2003 29–10 74.4% #17 1,939 2 19 — — — — — — —
23 2004 64–16 80.0% #3 2,076 2 23 — — — — — — —
24 2005 36–9 80.0% #4 2,092 2 24 — — — — — — —
25 2006 32–14 69.6% #20 1,964 2 25 1996 1–2 33.3% #561 1,499 0 0
26 2007 34–15 69.4% #21 1,925 2 26 — — — — — — —
27 2008 17–10 63.0% #67 1,936 2 26 1998 4–3 57.1% #187 1,568 0 0
28 2009 33–19 63.5% #22 1,956 2 27 1999 12–11 52.2% #105 1,651 0 0
29 2010 18–11 62.1% #54 1,907 2 28 2000 13–18 41.9% #83 1,700 0 0
30 2011 8–9 47.1% #186 1,817 2 28 2001 19–23 45.2% #77 1,638 0 0
31 2012 13–11 54.2% #83 1,867 2 28 2002 23–24 48.9% #52 1,700 0 0
32 2013 22–18 55.0% #60 1,884 2 28 2003 11–22 33.3% #117 1,612 0 0
33 2014 19–15 55.9% #50 1,841 2 30 2004 12–19 38.7% #101 1,567 0 0
34 2015 3–9 25.0% #307 1,715 2 30 2005 17–18 48.6% #97 1,624 0 1
35 2016 1–1 50.0% #633 1,727 2 30 2006 6–10 37.5% #161 1,626 0 1
36 — — — — — — — 2007 4–2 66.7% #244 1,668 0 1