H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC

Lleyton Hewitt vs Yevgeny Kafelnikov H2H: 6-0

Lleyton Hewitt holds a 6–0 lead over Yevgeny Kafelnikov in their ATP head-to-head. Across 6 main-draw meetings, Lleyton Hewitt leads 4–0 on hard courts and 2–0 on carpet. Most recently, Lleyton Hewitt won the 2003 Indian Wells Masters third round 6-3 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Lleyton Hewitt
AUS Age 45 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
6 – 0
6 main draw meetings
Yevgeny Kafelnikov
RUS Age 52 Right-Handed 190 cm / 6'3"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Mar 13, 2003* Indian Wells Masters Masters 1000 R32 Hard Lleyton Hewitt #1 6-3 6-2 Yevgeny Kafelnikov #23 Match data
Nov 2, 2002* Paris Masters Masters 1000 R16 Carpet Lleyton Hewitt #1 6-2 7-6(3) Yevgeny Kafelnikov #15 Match data
Sep 9, 2001* US Open Grand Slam SF Hard Lleyton Hewitt #4 6-1 6-2 6-1 Yevgeny Kafelnikov #7 Match data
Nov 5, 2000* Stuttgart Masters Masters 1000 SF Hard Lleyton Hewitt #8 6-4 6-7(5) 6-3 Yevgeny Kafelnikov #5 Match data
Mar 25, 2000* Miami Masters Masters 1000 R16 Hard Lleyton Hewitt #14 6-4 6-3 Yevgeny Kafelnikov #3 Match data
Nov 4, 1999* Paris Masters Masters 1000 R32 Carpet Lleyton Hewitt #26 6-4 2-6 6-4 Yevgeny Kafelnikov #2 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Lleyton Hewitt #636 #1 5,205 2,159 564 241 70.1% 2 2 2 1 23 30
Yevgeny Kafelnikov #636 #1 3,917 2,071 568 281 66.9% 2 0 0 0 23 25

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Lleyton Hewitt Yevgeny Kafelnikov
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1997 0–1 0.0% #550 1,492 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 1998 10–9 52.6% #100 1,614 0 1 — — — — — — —
18 1999 40–18 69.0% #25 1,853 0 2 1992 1–4 20.0% #275 1,477 0 0
19 2000 53–15 77.9% #7 1,993 0 6 1993 10–10 50.0% #102 1,588 0 0
20 2001 71–15 82.6% #1 2,116 1 12 1994 60–27 69.0% #11 1,888 0 3
21 2002 61–16 79.2% #1 2,062 2 17 1995 69–27 71.9% #6 1,875 0 7
22 2003 29–10 74.4% #17 1,939 2 19 1996 73–25 74.5% #3 1,972 1 11
23 2004 64–16 80.0% #3 2,076 2 23 1997 54–26 67.5% #5 1,955 1 14
24 2005 36–9 80.0% #4 2,092 2 24 1998 55–29 65.5% #11 1,950 1 17
25 2006 32–14 69.6% #20 1,964 2 25 1999 59–29 67.0% #2 1,922 2 20
26 2007 34–15 69.4% #21 1,925 2 26 2000 58–31 65.2% #5 1,859 2 21
27 2008 17–10 63.0% #67 1,936 2 26 2001 64–26 71.1% #4 1,979 2 23
28 2009 33–19 63.5% #22 1,956 2 27 2002 36–23 61.0% #27 1,809 2 25
29 2010 18–11 62.1% #54 1,907 2 28 2003 29–24 54.7% #41 1,708 2 25
30 2011 8–9 47.1% #186 1,817 2 28 — — — — — — —
31 2012 13–11 54.2% #83 1,867 2 28 — — — — — — —
32 2013 22–18 55.0% #60 1,884 2 28 — — — — — — —
33 2014 19–15 55.9% #50 1,841 2 30 — — — — — — —
34 2015 3–9 25.0% #307 1,715 2 30 — — — — — — —
35 2016 1–1 50.0% #633 1,727 2 30 — — — — — — —