H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:16 UTC
Lloyd Harris vs Marco Cecchinato H2H: 1-1
Lloyd Harris and Marco Cecchinato are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Marco Cecchinato leads 1–0 on clay, while Lloyd Harris leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Marco Cecchinato won the 2021 Estoril third round 6-3 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
South Africa
Age 29
Right-Handed
193 cm / 6'4"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
Italy
Age 33
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 29, 2021* | Estoril | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Marco Cecchinato | 6-3 6-4 | Lloyd Harris | Match data |
| Sep 2, 2020* | US Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Lloyd Harris | 6-4 7-5 6-2 | Marco Cecchinato | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lloyd Harris | #187 | #31 | 1,758 | 1,938 | 64 | 79 | 44.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Marco Cecchinato | #175 | #16 | 2,091 | 1,903 | 79 | 128 | 38.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Lloyd Harris | Marco Cecchinato | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 20 | 2017 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #291 | 1,509 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #163 | 1,587 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2018 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #127 | 1,567 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #159 | 1,586 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2019 | 8–13 | 38.1% | #99 | 1,641 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #90 | 1,555 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2020 | 10–9 | 52.6% | #87 | 1,795 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 2–10 | 16.7% | #187 | 1,562 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2021 | 29–23 | 55.8% | #31 | 1,914 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #109 | 1,557 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2022 | 6–13 | 31.6% | #237 | 1,748 | 0 | 0 | 2018 | 23–23 | 50.0% | #20 | 1,771 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | 2023 | 7–12 | 36.8% | #140 | 1,692 | 0 | 0 | 2019 | 14–25 | 35.9% | #71 | 1,651 | 0 | 3 |
| 27 | 2024 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #132 | 1,717 | 0 | 0 | 2020 | 8–13 | 38.1% | #80 | 1,764 | 0 | 3 |
| 28 | 2025 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #222 | 1,723 | 0 | 0 | 2021 | 16–21 | 43.2% | #100 | 1,679 | 0 | 3 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 4–7 | 36.4% | #101 | 1,656 | 0 | 3 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 11–15 | 42.3% | #198 | 1,613 | 0 | 3 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2026 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #175 | 1,544 | 0 | 3 |