H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Lorenzo Giustino vs Denis Istomin H2H: 0-2
Denis Istomin holds a 2–0 lead over Lorenzo Giustino in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Denis Istomin leads 2–0 on clay. Most recently, Denis Istomin won the 2017 Gstaad third round 6-3 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Italy
Age 34
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
0
–
2
2 main draw meetings
UZB
Age 39
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 10, 2021 | Doha Aus Open Qualies | Grand Slam | Q1 | Hard | Lorenzo Giustino | 6-1 6-1 | Denis Istomin | Match data |
| Jul 27, 2017* | Gstaad | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Denis Istomin | 6-3 6-2 | Lorenzo Giustino | Match data |
| Apr 7, 2016* | Marrakech | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Denis Istomin | 7-6(1) 6-4 | Lorenzo Giustino | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lorenzo Giustino | #196 | #127 | 444 | 1,598 | 1 | 7 | 12.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Denis Istomin | #1,509 | #33 | 1,217 | 1,900 | 191 | 245 | 43.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Lorenzo Giustino | Denis Istomin | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #200 | 1,474 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #105 | 1,559 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 13–17 | 43.3% | #102 | 1,636 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2015 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #252 | 1,566 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 29–29 | 50.0% | #40 | 1,767 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2016 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #213 | 1,544 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 10–21 | 32.3% | #73 | 1,665 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2017 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #259 | 1,508 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 26–29 | 47.3% | #43 | 1,732 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 30–29 | 50.8% | #45 | 1,808 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 24–23 | 51.1% | #49 | 1,853 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2020 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #152 | 1,584 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 20–23 | 46.5% | #61 | 1,788 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 2021 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #207 | 1,518 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 6–19 | 24.0% | #121 | 1,711 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 15–18 | 45.5% | #63 | 1,724 | 0 | 2 |
| 31 | 2023 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #287 | 1,436 | 0 | 0 | 2018 | 12–18 | 40.0% | #92 | 1,679 | 0 | 2 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 3–11 | 21.4% | #177 | 1,567 | 0 | 2 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #184 | 1,545 | 0 | 2 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #254 | 1,545 | 0 | 2 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #467 | 1,577 | 0 | 2 |