H2H data updated: 2026-09-09 00:00 UTC

Lorenzo Manta vs John Van Lottum H2H: 1-0

Lorenzo Manta holds a 1–0 lead over John Van Lottum in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Lorenzo Manta leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Lorenzo Manta won the 1999 Tashkent round of 32 7-6(1) 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Lorenzo Manta
SUI Age 51 Right-Handed 190 cm / 6'3"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main-draw meetings
John Van Lottum
NED Age 50 Right-Handed

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Lorenzo Manta #106 7-6(1) 6-3 John Van Lottum Match data Sep 16, 1999* R32 Tashkent ATP World Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Lorenzo Manta #1,104 #103 474 1,590 10 26 27.8% 0 0 0 0 0 0
John Van Lottum — — — 1,719 — — — 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Lorenzo Manta John Van Lottum
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
19 1994 0–1 0.0% #238 1,497 0 0 — — — — — — —
20 1995 0–3 0.0% #299 1,474 0 0 — — — — — — —
21 1996 0–2 0.0% #350 1,444 0 0 — — — — — — —
22 1997 0–1 0.0% #323 1,442 0 0 — — — — — — —
23 1998 0–1 0.0% #197 1,432 0 0 — — — — — — —
24 1999 6–6 50.0% #115 1,559 0 0 — — — — — — —
25 2000 4–11 26.7% #171 1,465 0 0 — — — — — — —
26 2001 0–1 0.0% #505 1,442 0 0 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Lorenzo Manta John Van Lottum
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
19 1994 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1995 — — — — — — — — — — — — 0 3 3 0.0% 1996 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
21 1996 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1997 2 1 3 66.7% 2 1 3 66.7% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — —
22 1997 — — — — — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1998 3 6 9 33.3% 2 6 8 25.0% 6 3 9 66.7% 2 5 7 28.6%
23 1998 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1999 17 13 30 56.7% 1 5 6 16.7% 1 3 4 25.0% 2 1 3 66.7%
24 1999 3 3 6 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 1 4 75.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2000 2 8 10 20.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
25 2000 4 6 10 40.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — 2001 0 2 2 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
26 2001 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2002 1 3 4 25.0% 3 1 4 75.0% — — — — — — — —
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2003 3 6 9 33.3% 5 5 10 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — —
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2004 2 6 8 25.0% 0 4 4 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — —
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 7 10 17 41.2% 0 5 5 0.0% 3 6 9 33.3% 0 5 5 0.0% — 30 46 76 39.5% 13 27 40 32.5% 13 15 28 46.4% 4 7 11 36.4%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Lorenzo Manta John Van Lottum
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
19 1994 1497 108.2 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — -0.24 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1995 1475 111.6 — — — — +35 — — 14.3% -2.14 0–1 0–1 — -0.09 1996 1491 106.9 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.75 — — — -0.35
21 1996 1444 103.6 — — — — — — — 28.6% -1.00 0–1 1–2 (33%) — +0.26 1997 1631 121.6 — — — — -56 -46 +18 64.5% +0.77 1–2 (33%) 3–2 (60%) 100.2 -0.05
22 1997 1442 107.7 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.00 — 0–1 — -0.16 1998 1612 120.7 — — — — -50 -79 +129 40.7% -0.59 5–3 (63%) 3–7 (30%) 101.6 +0.05
23 1998 1432 97.0 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.00 — 0–1 — +0.11 1999 1662 128.3 — — — — +36 -181 +3 49.1% -0.33 6–6 (50%) 13–3 (81%) 107.6 +1.68
24 1999 1559 123.3 — — — — -13 — +83 47.4% -0.24 3–1 (75%) 4–4 (50%) 105.1 +0.09 2000 1517 104.0 — — — — +57 — — 18.5% -2.33 0–2 0–2 — +0.38
25 2000 1466 102.3 — — — — +39 — +100 34.2% -0.92 2–5 (29%) 1–4 (20%) 95.5 +1.23 2001 1584 111.2 — — — — — — — 20.0% -2.87 0–1 1–1 — -0.48
26 2001 1442 102.8 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.00 — — — -0.13 2002 1624 118.0 — — — — -2 -68 — 50.0% -0.30 0–1 1–1 — +0.19
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2003 1599 123.9 -1.54 -1.36 0.912 48.4% -3 +14 -27 46.7% -0.27 3–4 (43%) 3–2 (60%) 101.1 +0.37
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2004 1512 123.3 -1.67 -2.93 0.813 47.0% +60 +41 +27 37.5% -1.07 0–6 (0%) 3–1 (75%) 96.3 -0.92
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 1511 103.1 +0.34 +3.36 0.751 46.4% — — — 0.0% -2.00 — 0–1 — -0.12
Career — 1590 115.4 — — — — +20 — +90 34.7% -0.92 5–8 (38%) 6–13 (32%) 97.1 +2.97 — 1719 126.6 -1.54 -1.86 0.869 47.8% +15 -52 +48 43.0% -0.64 15–25 (38%) 27–20 (57%) 100.9 +0.48

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.