H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 13:16 UTC
Lorenzo Sonego vs Aljaz Bedene H2H: 0-1
Aljaz Bedene holds a 1–0 lead over Lorenzo Sonego in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Aljaz Bedene leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Aljaz Bedene won the 2018 Budapest quarterfinal 6-3 2-6 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Italy
Age 31
Right-Handed
191 cm / 6'3"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
SLO
Age 37
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 26, 2020 | Vienna | ATP 500 | Q2 | Hard | Aljaz Bedene | 6-2 4-6 7-5 | Lorenzo Sonego | Match data |
| Apr 28, 2018* | Budapest | ATP 250 | QF | Clay | Aljaz Bedene | 6-3 2-6 6-2 | Lorenzo Sonego | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lorenzo Sonego | #83 | #21 | 2,227 | 1,928 | 166 | 188 | 46.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
| Aljaz Bedene | #1,030 | #43 | 1,169 | 1,893 | 130 | 159 | 45.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Lorenzo Sonego | Aljaz Bedene | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 21 | 2016 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #300 | 1,463 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #165 | 1,597 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #86 | 1,627 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2018 | 5–6 | 45.5% | #107 | 1,595 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 10–17 | 37.0% | #95 | 1,625 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2019 | 20–23 | 46.5% | #52 | 1,725 | 0 | 1 | 2014 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #145 | 1,669 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2020 | 12–14 | 46.2% | #33 | 1,808 | 0 | 1 | 2015 | 17–17 | 50.0% | #45 | 1,775 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2021 | 27–22 | 55.1% | #27 | 1,841 | 0 | 2 | 2016 | 12–19 | 38.7% | #101 | 1,740 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2022 | 24–28 | 46.2% | #45 | 1,760 | 0 | 3 | 2017 | 19–18 | 51.4% | #49 | 1,816 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2023 | 27–28 | 49.1% | #46 | 1,776 | 0 | 3 | 2018 | 17–19 | 47.2% | #67 | 1,732 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2024 | 21–27 | 43.8% | #53 | 1,760 | 0 | 4 | 2019 | 18–18 | 50.0% | #58 | 1,838 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2025 | 22–28 | 44.0% | #40 | 1,734 | 0 | 4 | 2020 | 10–12 | 45.5% | #58 | 1,796 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | 2026 | 8–11 | 42.1% | #83 | 1,710 | 0 | 4 | 2021 | 15–15 | 50.0% | #109 | 1,773 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 3–10 | 23.1% | #347 | 1,658 | 0 | 0 |