H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:15 UTC
Lorenzo Sonego vs Bernard Tomic
Compare the head-to-head record, career totals, season-by-season performance, and match log for Lorenzo Sonego vs Bernard Tomic.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Italy
Age 31
Right-Handed
191 cm / 6'3"
H2H
0
–
0
0 main draw meetings
Australia
Age 33
Right-Handed
196 cm / 6'5"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| No head-to-head meetings found. | ||||||||
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lorenzo Sonego | #83 | #21 | 2,227 | 1,928 | 166 | 188 | 46.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
| Bernard Tomic | #206 | #17 | 1,885 | 1,968 | 170 | 182 | 48.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Lorenzo Sonego | Bernard Tomic | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #286 | 1,526 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #208 | 1,591 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2011 | 14–14 | 50.0% | #42 | 1,790 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 22–25 | 46.8% | #52 | 1,763 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 21–22 | 48.8% | #51 | 1,788 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 2016 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #300 | 1,463 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 17–16 | 51.5% | #56 | 1,828 | 0 | 2 |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 37–27 | 57.8% | #18 | 1,913 | 0 | 3 |
| 23 | 2018 | 5–6 | 45.5% | #107 | 1,595 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 28–23 | 54.9% | #26 | 1,872 | 0 | 3 |
| 24 | 2019 | 20–23 | 46.5% | #52 | 1,725 | 0 | 1 | 2017 | 10–20 | 33.3% | #140 | 1,726 | 0 | 3 |
| 25 | 2020 | 12–14 | 46.2% | #33 | 1,808 | 0 | 1 | 2018 | 9–7 | 56.2% | #83 | 1,744 | 0 | 4 |
| 26 | 2021 | 27–22 | 55.1% | #27 | 1,841 | 0 | 2 | 2019 | 7–15 | 31.8% | #185 | 1,632 | 0 | 4 |
| 27 | 2022 | 24–28 | 46.2% | #45 | 1,760 | 0 | 3 | 2020 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #226 | 1,598 | 0 | 4 |
| 28 | 2023 | 27–28 | 49.1% | #46 | 1,776 | 0 | 3 | 2021 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #260 | 1,613 | 0 | 4 |
| 29 | 2024 | 21–27 | 43.8% | #53 | 1,760 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2025 | 22–28 | 44.0% | #40 | 1,734 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2026 | 8–11 | 42.1% | #83 | 1,710 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #192 | 1,595 | 0 | 4 |