H2H data updated: 2026-09-01 00:00 UTC

Lorenzo Sonego vs Bernard Tomic

Compare the head-to-head record, career totals, season-by-season performance, and match log for Lorenzo Sonego vs Bernard Tomic.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Lorenzo Sonego
Italy Age 31 Right-Handed 191 cm / 6'3"
H2H
0 – 0
0 main draw meetings
Bernard Tomic
Australia Age 33 Right-Handed 196 cm / 6'5"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Lorenzo Sonego #219 6-1 6-7(5) 6-4 Bernard Tomic #143 Match data Jan 16, 2018* Q3 Q Australian Open Grand Slam Hard

1 qualifying meeting shown in the table; qualifying is excluded from the H2H score. Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Lorenzo Sonego #89 #21 2,227 1,928 174 193 47.4% 0 0 0 0 4 4
Bernard Tomic #179 #17 1,885 1,972 172 184 48.3% 0 0 0 0 4 4

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Lorenzo Sonego Bernard Tomic
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 — — — — — — — 2009 1–3 25.0% #286 1,526 0 0
17 — — — — — — — 2010 2–6 25.0% #208 1,591 0 0
18 — — — — — — — 2011 14–14 50.0% #42 1,791 0 0
19 — — — — — — — 2012 22–26 45.8% #52 1,756 0 0
20 — — — — — — — 2013 21–22 48.8% #51 1,786 0 1
21 2016 0–1 0.0% #300 1,463 0 0 2014 17–16 51.5% #56 1,834 0 2
22 — — — — — — — 2015 37–27 57.8% #18 1,914 0 3
23 2018 5–6 45.5% #107 1,596 0 0 2016 28–23 54.9% #26 1,874 0 3
24 2019 20–23 46.5% #52 1,724 0 1 2017 10–20 33.3% #140 1,728 0 3
25 2020 12–14 46.2% #33 1,808 0 1 2018 9–7 56.2% #83 1,745 0 4
26 2021 28–23 54.9% #27 1,834 0 2 2019 7–15 31.8% #185 1,620 0 4
27 2022 24–28 46.2% #45 1,759 0 3 2020 0–1 0.0% #226 1,589 0 4
28 2023 27–28 49.1% #46 1,778 0 3 2021 1–1 50.0% #260 1,608 0 4
29 2024 21–27 43.8% #53 1,751 0 4 — — — — — — —
30 2025 26–29 47.3% #40 1,769 0 4 — — — — — — —
31 2026 11–14 44.0% #89 1,719 0 4 — — — — — — —
32 — — — — — — — 2025 1–2 33.3% #192 1,592 0 4
33 — — — — — — — 2026 2–1 66.7% #179 1,573 0 4

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Lorenzo Sonego Bernard Tomic
Yr HardClayGrass Yr HardClayGrass
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2010 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2011 10 12 22 45.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 1 5 80.0%
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2012 15 13 28 53.6% 7 9 16 43.8% 0 4 4 0.0%
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2013 15 15 30 50.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 5 3 8 62.5%
21 2016 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2014 14 11 25 56.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0%
22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2015 31 17 48 64.6% 2 6 8 25.0% 4 4 8 50.0%
23 2018 2 2 4 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2016 19 14 33 57.6% 2 6 8 25.0% 7 3 10 70.0%
24 2019 4 9 13 30.8% 11 12 23 47.8% 5 2 7 71.4% 2017 3 10 13 23.1% 3 6 9 33.3% 4 4 8 50.0%
25 2020 5 7 12 41.7% 7 7 14 50.0% — — — — 2018 5 2 7 71.4% 0 2 2 0.0% 4 3 7 57.1%
26 2021 13 16 29 44.8% 9 4 13 69.2% 6 3 9 66.7% 2019 4 7 11 36.4% 1 5 6 16.7% 2 3 5 40.0%
27 2022 11 13 24 45.8% 8 11 19 42.1% 5 4 9 55.6% 2020 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
28 2023 16 17 33 48.5% 9 7 16 56.3% 2 4 6 33.3% 2021 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
29 2024 12 16 28 42.9% 6 8 14 42.9% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2025 20 20 40 50.0% 1 5 6 16.7% 5 4 9 55.6% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2026 5 5 10 50.0% 3 6 9 33.3% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2025 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0%
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2026 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — —
Career — 88 105 193 45.6% 57 64 121 47.1% 29 24 53 54.7% — 121 110 231 52.4% 16 43 59 27.1% 35 31 66 53.0%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 359/368 of Lorenzo Sonego's and 352/356 of Bernard Tomic's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Lorenzo Sonego Bernard Tomic
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
16 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2009 4/4 4.8 3.3 60.2% 56.3% 47.1% 57.1% 24.5% 52.6% 29.2%
17 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2010 8/8 3.8 3.0 64.3% 65.2% 45.9% 58.2% 34.1% 58.3% 33.8%
18 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2011 28/28 6.5 2.4 65.8% 70.0% 50.1% 63.0% 36.9% 62.9% 34.1%
19 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2012 47/48 4.8 1.5 65.8% 67.4% 50.2% 57.5% 36.4% 61.4% 35.1%
20 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2013 43/43 8.0 1.3 66.4% 71.1% 51.3% 64.6% 38.6% 64.4% 32.7%
21 2016 1/1 5.0 4.0 61.5% 58.8% 48.0% 60.0% 33.3% 54.6% 38.5% 2014 32/33 9.3 1.1 67.2% 73.6% 52.5% 58.0% 40.9% 66.8% 33.0%
22 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2015 63/64 9.1 1.5 66.1% 73.1% 50.9% 66.3% 40.9% 65.5% 34.2%
23 2018 11/11 8.4 2.9 63.3% 72.3% 48.7% 52.3% 28.3% 63.7% 30.5% 2016 51/51 9.4 2.3 65.3% 72.5% 48.8% 59.9% 36.0% 64.4% 33.1%
24 2019 43/43 6.5 1.9 62.6% 75.3% 52.3% 62.4% 35.2% 66.6% 33.5% 2017 29/30 6.9 1.9 66.7% 69.5% 51.7% 60.9% 35.3% 63.3% 31.1%
25 2020 26/26 4.9 2.0 63.8% 72.7% 49.6% 63.8% 37.6% 64.6% 34.6% 2018 16/16 9.4 1.3 67.3% 73.5% 50.8% 61.3% 43.7% 66.0% 35.6%
26 2021 49/51 6.2 1.9 65.8% 72.6% 51.7% 57.8% 41.2% 65.5% 36.4% 2019 22/22 9.1 1.9 64.6% 68.5% 43.9% 56.2% 36.0% 59.5% 29.6%
27 2022 52/52 6.0 1.8 68.5% 72.3% 49.8% 58.5% 47.1% 65.5% 36.3% 2020 1/1 8.0 2.0 68.8% 64.1% 44.8% 76.5% 16.7% 58.1% 31.6%
28 2023 55/55 5.5 2.0 66.3% 72.2% 52.9% 61.9% 34.3% 65.7% 34.5% 2021 2/2 8.0 4.0 58.8% 68.0% 37.1% 65.6% 28.6% 56.1% 34.6%
29 2024 47/48 6.6 2.0 67.6% 74.2% 51.8% 60.8% 37.0% 66.9% 32.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
30 2025 50/55 6.2 2.6 65.3% 73.1% 50.9% 66.5% 42.5% 65.4% 33.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
31 2026 25/26 7.4 2.2 66.1% 71.6% 51.6% 54.8% 33.1% 65.2% 33.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
32 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2025 3/3 5.3 2.0 58.0% 69.0% 48.3% 61.0% 37.7% 59.7% 33.3%
33 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2026 3/3 8.3 2.7 63.0% 71.3% 41.3% 46.3% 38.0% 61.0% 40.3%
Career — 359/368 6.2 2.1 65.8% 73.0% 51.3% 60.7% 38.7% 65.7% 34.4% — 352/356 7.9 1.8 65.8% 70.8% 49.9% 61.2% 37.8% 63.5% 33.3%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Lorenzo Sonego Bernard Tomic
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 1502 94.6 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 1526 105.3 -2.94 -0.81 0.615 41.2% -3 — — 30.8% -2.23 — 3–0 (100%) — -0.09
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2010 1591 118.9 -1.47 -0.26 0.811 46.8% -52 — +98 34.8% -1.00 1–2 (33%) 1–1 — -0.20
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2011 1791 144.2 +0.77 -1.38 0.919 48.9% -92 — +124 51.9% -0.18 6–6 (50%) 13–4 (76%) — -0.34
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2012 1757 150.9 -1.11 -0.69 0.907 48.6% +52 -169 +23 46.3% -0.31 7–6 (54%) 7–8 (47%) — -1.42
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2013 1787 149.3 +0.99 -2.79 0.919 48.8% -8 -226 +96 50.5% -0.09 7–5 (58%) 16–12 (57%) — -1.00
21 2016 1464 103.2 -0.70 -1.87 0.849 47.3% — — — 33.3% -1.33 0–1 1–0 — +0.01 2014 1835 142.5 +1.91 -1.36 0.995 49.7% +21 — +30 53.2% +0.01 7–5 (58%) 11–12 (48%) — -0.73
22 2017 1460 107.3 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2015 1915 162.1 +1.61 -0.87 0.990 50.4% +64 -388 -38 57.6% +0.46 12–12 (50%) 18–21 (46%) — +2.35
23 2018 1596 121.0 +0.15 -2.94 0.838 47.7% +29 -28 — 42.9% -0.71 3–2 (60%) 5–3 (63%) — -0.12 2016 1875 151.1 +0.69 -2.24 0.928 49.4% +25 -337 +82 57.0% +0.26 9–7 (56%) 12–15 (44%) — +2.21
24 2019 1724 141.8 +2.07 -2.13 1.003 49.8% -93 +76 -69 46.6% -0.21 6–7 (46%) 14–14 (50%) — -0.90 2017 1728 133.1 -0.38 -4.25 0.846 47.7% -3 -160 +146 36.6% -0.72 4–3 (57%) 4–8 (33%) — -0.82
25 2020 1808 147.1 +1.02 -1.41 0.979 49.9% -109 -6 — 46.9% -0.05 2–2 (50%) 8–8 (50%) — +0.07 2018 1745 126.0 +1.66 -1.18 1.046 50.5% -2 — +164 56.8% +0.20 3–4 (43%) 8–2 (80%) — +1.42
26 2021 1835 149.9 +2.09 +0.36 1.057 51.0% -130 +64 -45 54.5% +0.38 9–10 (47%) 13–10 (57%) — +0.23 2019 1621 132.2 -3.23 -3.79 0.733 45.7% +73 -101 +197 34.0% -1.08 2–2 (50%) 5–5 (50%) — -0.65
27 2022 1759 140.3 +1.65 -0.64 1.054 51.0% -44 +3 +91 52.2% +0.20 4–15 (21%) 15–11 (58%) — +2.99 2020 1590 103.5 -0.93 -0.44 0.755 45.9% — — — 33.3% -1.67 0–1 — — +0.03
28 2023 1779 149.8 +1.78 -0.51 1.006 50.0% -14 +45 +6 48.6% -0.02 11–6 (65%) 10–13 (43%) — -3.07 2021 1608 104.1 -1.59 +0.30 0.788 46.1% — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — +0.09
29 2024 1751 143.2 +2.42 -2.39 0.982 49.5% -3 -9 +33 44.9% -0.25 5–6 (45%) 12–13 (48%) — -0.76 2022 1577 102.4 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2025 1769 146.3 +1.21 -1.39 0.972 50.0% -1 -112 +49 49.0% +0.10 9–13 (41%) 15–17 (47%) — +0.19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2026 1719 122.4 +0.19 -1.07 0.967 49.0% +31 -95 +72 41.8% -0.43 5–1 (83%) 9–8 (53%) — +0.54 2024 1563 98.2 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2025 1593 108.5 -0.49 -2.98 0.826 46.7% — — — 28.6% -1.29 1–0 0–1 — -0.04
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2026 1574 107.6 -0.90 +0.99 1.034 51.0% +27 — — 66.7% +1.00 — — — +0.24
Career — 1928 147.6 +1.62 -1.16 1.001 50.1% -39 +12 +20 48.5% -0.02 54–63 (46%) 102–97 (51%) 99.6 -0.22 — 1973 147.3 +0.35 -1.82 0.915 48.9% +19 -225 +90 49.9% -0.13 59–53 (53%) 98–89 (52%) 105.0 +0.30

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.