H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Lorenzo Sonego vs Borna Coric H2H: 0-1
Borna Coric holds a 1–0 lead over Lorenzo Sonego in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Borna Coric leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Borna Coric won the 2020 ATP Rio de Janeiro quarterfinal 7-6(5) 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Italy
Age 31
Right-Handed
191 cm / 6'3"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
Croatia
Age 29
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 12, 2024 | Cincinnati Masters | Masters 1000 | Q1 | Hard | Lorenzo Sonego | 3-6 6-2 6-3 | Borna Coric | Match data |
| Feb 22, 2020* | ATP Rio de Janeiro | ATP 500 | QF | Clay | Borna Coric | 7-6(5) 6-3 | Lorenzo Sonego | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lorenzo Sonego | #83 | #21 | 2,227 | 1,928 | 166 | 188 | 46.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
| Borna Coric | #237 | #12 | 2,695 | 2,047 | 200 | 187 | 51.7% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Lorenzo Sonego | Borna Coric | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #303 | 1,495 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 6–5 | 54.5% | #102 | 1,647 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 24–27 | 47.1% | #44 | 1,824 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 21–20 | 51.2% | #48 | 1,866 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 21–25 | 45.7% | #48 | 1,803 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 2016 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #300 | 1,463 | 0 | 0 | 2018 | 35–19 | 64.8% | #12 | 2,014 | 0 | 2 |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 27–22 | 55.1% | #28 | 1,814 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | 2018 | 5–6 | 45.5% | #107 | 1,595 | 0 | 0 | 2020 | 15–10 | 60.0% | #24 | 1,883 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 2019 | 20–23 | 46.5% | #52 | 1,725 | 0 | 1 | 2021 | 6–3 | 66.7% | #73 | 1,891 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 2020 | 12–14 | 46.2% | #33 | 1,808 | 0 | 1 | 2022 | 16–12 | 57.1% | #26 | 1,931 | 0 | 3 |
| 26 | 2021 | 27–22 | 55.1% | #27 | 1,841 | 0 | 2 | 2023 | 18–18 | 50.0% | #37 | 1,789 | 0 | 3 |
| 27 | 2022 | 24–28 | 46.2% | #45 | 1,760 | 0 | 3 | 2024 | 11–18 | 37.9% | #90 | 1,650 | 0 | 3 |
| 28 | 2023 | 27–28 | 49.1% | #46 | 1,776 | 0 | 3 | 2025 | 0–7 | 0.0% | #115 | 1,574 | 0 | 3 |
| 29 | 2024 | 21–27 | 43.8% | #53 | 1,760 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2025 | 22–28 | 44.0% | #40 | 1,734 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2026 | 8–11 | 42.1% | #83 | 1,710 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |