H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC
Lorenzo Sonego vs James Duckworth H2H: 2-0
Lorenzo Sonego holds a 2–0 lead over James Duckworth in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Lorenzo Sonego leads 2–0 on grass. Most recently, Lorenzo Sonego won the 2022 Eastbourne third round 4-6 7-6(5) 7-6(1).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Italy
Age 31
Right-Handed
191 cm / 6'3"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
Australia
Age 34
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 22, 2022* | Eastbourne | ATP 250 | R32 | Grass | Lorenzo Sonego | 4-6 7-6(5) 7-6(1) | James Duckworth | Match data |
| Jul 4, 2021* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R32 | Grass | Lorenzo Sonego | 6-3 6-4 6-4 | James Duckworth | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lorenzo Sonego | #83 | #21 | 2,227 | 1,928 | 166 | 188 | 46.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
| James Duckworth | #74 | #46 | 1,244 | 1,799 | 76 | 128 | 37.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Lorenzo Sonego | James Duckworth | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #209 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2016 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #300 | 1,463 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #136 | 1,567 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 1–7 | 12.5% | #127 | 1,603 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2018 | 5–6 | 45.5% | #107 | 1,595 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 9–11 | 45.0% | #120 | 1,628 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2019 | 20–23 | 46.5% | #52 | 1,725 | 0 | 1 | 2016 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #103 | 1,704 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2020 | 12–14 | 46.2% | #33 | 1,808 | 0 | 1 | 2017 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #990 | 1,685 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2021 | 27–22 | 55.1% | #27 | 1,841 | 0 | 2 | 2018 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #234 | 1,609 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2022 | 24–28 | 46.2% | #45 | 1,760 | 0 | 3 | 2019 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #100 | 1,574 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2023 | 27–28 | 49.1% | #46 | 1,776 | 0 | 3 | 2020 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #103 | 1,577 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2024 | 21–27 | 43.8% | #53 | 1,760 | 0 | 4 | 2021 | 21–18 | 53.8% | #49 | 1,791 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2025 | 22–28 | 44.0% | #40 | 1,734 | 0 | 4 | 2022 | 7–13 | 35.0% | #155 | 1,688 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | 2026 | 8–11 | 42.1% | #83 | 1,710 | 0 | 4 | 2023 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #116 | 1,597 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 9–15 | 37.5% | #82 | 1,638 | 0 | 0 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 8–12 | 40.0% | #87 | 1,661 | 0 | 0 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2026 | 4–11 | 26.7% | #74 | 1,613 | 0 | 0 |