H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:16 UTC
Lorenzo Sonego vs Peter Gojowczyk H2H: 1-1
Lorenzo Sonego and Peter Gojowczyk are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on clay. Most recently, Lorenzo Sonego won the 2022 Roland Garros first round 6-2 6-2 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Italy
Age 31
Right-Handed
191 cm / 6'3"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
GER
Age 37
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 24, 2022* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R128 | Clay | Lorenzo Sonego | 6-2 6-2 6-1 | Peter Gojowczyk | Match data |
| May 16, 2018* | Rome Masters | Masters 1000 | R32 | Clay | Peter Gojowczyk | 6-3 6-4 | Lorenzo Sonego | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lorenzo Sonego | #83 | #21 | 2,227 | 1,928 | 166 | 188 | 46.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
| Peter Gojowczyk | #1,284 | #39 | 1,175 | 1,885 | 75 | 97 | 43.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Lorenzo Sonego | Peter Gojowczyk | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #494 | 1,515 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2016 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #300 | 1,463 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #181 | 1,584 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2018 | 5–6 | 45.5% | #107 | 1,595 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #162 | 1,608 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2019 | 20–23 | 46.5% | #52 | 1,725 | 0 | 1 | 2014 | 7–8 | 46.7% | #79 | 1,697 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2020 | 12–14 | 46.2% | #33 | 1,808 | 0 | 1 | 2015 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #194 | 1,652 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2021 | 27–22 | 55.1% | #27 | 1,841 | 0 | 2 | 2016 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #189 | 1,678 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2022 | 24–28 | 46.2% | #45 | 1,760 | 0 | 3 | 2017 | 14–9 | 60.9% | #60 | 1,809 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 2023 | 27–28 | 49.1% | #46 | 1,776 | 0 | 3 | 2018 | 23–25 | 47.9% | #59 | 1,801 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 2024 | 21–27 | 43.8% | #53 | 1,760 | 0 | 4 | 2019 | 10–21 | 32.3% | #117 | 1,671 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | 2025 | 22–28 | 44.0% | #40 | 1,734 | 0 | 4 | 2020 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #145 | 1,621 | 0 | 1 |
| 31 | 2026 | 8–11 | 42.1% | #83 | 1,710 | 0 | 4 | 2021 | 13–9 | 59.1% | #86 | 1,756 | 0 | 1 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 4–14 | 22.2% | #235 | 1,585 | 0 | 1 |