H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 19:16 UTC
Lucas Pouille vs Kyle Edmund H2H: 1-2
Kyle Edmund holds a 2–1 lead over Lucas Pouille in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts, while Kyle Edmund leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Kyle Edmund won the 2018 Rome Masters third round 6-2 7-6(3).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
France
Age 32
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
1
–
2
3 main draw meetings
Great Britain
Age 31
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 16, 2018* | Rome Masters | Masters 1000 | R32 | Clay | Kyle Edmund | 6-2 7-6(3) | Lucas Pouille | Match data |
| Oct 28, 2017* | Vienna | ATP 500 | SF | Hard | Lucas Pouille | 6-7(7) 6-4 6-3 | Kyle Edmund | Match data |
| Jan 6, 2017* | Brisbane | ATP 250 | R16 | Hard | Kyle Edmund | 6-3 3-1 (ret.) | Lucas Pouille | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lucas Pouille | #583 | #10 | 2,746 | 2,040 | 137 | 131 | 51.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 5 |
| Kyle Edmund | #703 | #14 | 2,330 | 2,002 | 113 | 120 | 48.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Lucas Pouille | Kyle Edmund | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #376 | 1,509 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2013 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #204 | 1,573 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 0–5 | 0.0% | #194 | 1,473 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2014 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #133 | 1,653 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #102 | 1,580 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2015 | 12–14 | 46.2% | #78 | 1,699 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 19–18 | 51.4% | #45 | 1,891 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2016 | 33–21 | 61.1% | #15 | 2,019 | 0 | 1 | 2017 | 29–27 | 51.8% | #50 | 1,877 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2017 | 34–20 | 63.0% | #18 | 1,954 | 0 | 4 | 2018 | 37–21 | 63.8% | #14 | 1,958 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 2018 | 22–20 | 52.4% | #32 | 1,804 | 0 | 5 | 2019 | 14–22 | 38.9% | #69 | 1,772 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 2019 | 21–21 | 50.0% | #22 | 1,871 | 0 | 5 | 2020 | 10–9 | 52.6% | #48 | 1,765 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | 2021 | 5–14 | 26.3% | #155 | 1,671 | 0 | 5 | 2022 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #581 | 1,736 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | 2022 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #381 | 1,616 | 0 | 5 | 2023 | 0–7 | 0.0% | #538 | 1,654 | 0 | 2 |
| 29 | 2023 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #330 | 1,670 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2024 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #101 | 1,727 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2025 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #554 | 1,698 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |