H2H data updated: 2026-09-05 00:00 UTC

Luis Ayala vs Bob Lutz H2H: 1-0

Luis Ayala holds a 1–0 lead over Bob Lutz in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Luis Ayala leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Luis Ayala won the 1969 Indianapolis round of 32 8-6 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Luis Ayala
CHI Right-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main draw meetings
Bob Lutz
USA Age 79 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Luis Ayala 8-6 6-2 Bob Lutz Match data Jul 24, 1969* R32 Indianapolis ATP 250 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Luis Ayala #548 #482 0 1,634 25 25 50.0% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bob Lutz — — — 2,053 388 272 58.8% 0 0 0 0 11 11

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Luis Ayala Bob Lutz
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
20 — — — — — — — 1968 23–15 60.5% — 1,707 0 0
21 — — — — — — — 1969 24–16 60.0% — 1,845 0 0
22 — — — — — — — 1970 23–18 56.1% — 1,855 0 2
23 — — — — — — — 1971 45–25 64.3% — 1,992 0 4
24 — — — — — — — 1972 36–29 55.4% — 1,912 0 5
25 — — — — — — — 1973 16–14 53.3% — 1,841 0 5
26 — — — — — — — 1974 15–18 45.5% — 1,745 0 5
27 — — — — — — — 1975 36–19 65.5% — 1,875 0 6
28 — — — — — — — 1976 27–17 61.4% — 1,926 0 6
29 — — — — — — — 1977 36–22 62.1% — 1,833 0 6
30 — — — — — — — 1978 28–16 63.6% — 1,917 0 7
31 — — — — — — — 1979 23–13 63.9% — 1,889 0 8
32 — — — — — — — 1980 33–17 66.0% — 1,952 0 11
33 — — — — — — — 1981 10–13 43.5% — 1,788 0 11
34 — — — — — — — 1982 6–15 28.6% — 1,698 0 11
35 1968 7–6 53.8% — 1,500 0 0 1983 3–3 50.0% — 1,698 0 11
36 1969 9–9 50.0% — 1,594 0 0 1984 3–1 75.0% — 1,740 0 11
37 1970 6–6 50.0% — 1,590 0 0 1985 1–1 50.0% — 1,742 0 11
38 1971 3–3 50.0% — 1,584 0 0 — — — — — — —
49 1982 0–1 0.0% — 1,574 0 0 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Luis Ayala Bob Lutz
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1968 9 8 17 52.9% 3 2 5 60.0% 10 4 14 71.4% 1 1 2 50.0%
21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1969 9 5 14 64.3% 2 4 6 33.3% 13 6 19 68.4% 0 1 1 0.0%
22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1970 12 11 23 52.2% — — — — 10 5 15 66.7% 1 2 3 33.3%
23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1971 13 7 20 65.0% 9 6 15 60.0% 10 5 15 66.7% 13 7 20 65.0%
24 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1972 6 7 13 46.2% 5 5 10 50.0% 3 1 4 75.0% 22 16 38 57.9%
25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1973 6 4 10 60.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 10 6 16 62.5%
26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1974 5 5 10 50.0% 5 7 12 41.7% 1 3 4 25.0% 4 3 7 57.1%
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1975 15 8 23 65.2% 4 4 8 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 17 6 23 73.9%
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1976 5 3 8 62.5% 8 5 13 61.5% 3 2 5 60.0% 11 7 18 61.1%
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1977 9 9 18 50.0% 11 7 18 61.1% 7 2 9 77.8% 9 4 13 69.2%
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1978 14 5 19 73.7% 4 1 5 80.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 10 8 18 55.6%
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1979 5 4 9 55.6% 1 1 2 50.0% 8 3 11 72.7% 9 5 14 64.3%
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1980 22 8 30 73.3% 1 0 1 100.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 9 6 15 60.0%
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1981 7 8 15 46.7% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 2 4 6 33.3%
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1982 3 7 10 30.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 5 6 16.7%
35 1968 — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% 6 4 10 60.0% — — — — 1983 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — 2 1 3 66.7%
36 1969 1 1 2 50.0% 5 5 10 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — 1984 3 1 4 75.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 1970 3 3 6 50.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1985 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
38 1971 1 1 2 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
49 1982 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 5 5 10 50.0% 11 12 23 47.8% 9 8 17 52.9% — — — — — 145 103 248 58.5% 54 47 101 53.5% 68 40 108 63.0% 121 82 203 59.6%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Luis Ayala Bob Lutz
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1968 1708 127.8 — — — — -52 -164 +67 59.8% +0.80 4–5 (44%) — — -2.16
21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1969 1846 130.9 — — — — -50 -320 +54 53.3% +0.29 10–3 (77%) — — -1.31
22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1970 1855 135.8 — — — — -25 — +52 56.6% +0.49 4–8 (33%) 2–1 (67%) 95.6 -0.30
23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1971 1992 148.4 — — — — +23 -288 -66 59.7% +0.74 12–8 (60%) 9–10 (47%) 102.7 -4.07
24 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1972 1913 151.7 — — — — +8 -156 +37 56.2% +0.37 12–14 (46%) 10–10 (50%) 96.5 -4.12
25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1973 1841 135.1 — — — — +30 — — 57.1% +0.44 6–6 (50%) 4–5 (44%) 96.7 -1.03
26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1974 1745 137.0 — — — — +68 -31 +144 42.5% -0.23 3–4 (43%) 7–9 (44%) 96.4 -2.71
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1975 1875 152.4 — — — — +83 -147 — 63.6% +1.08 7–4 (64%) 4–6 (40%) 100.4 -0.90
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1976 1926 158.4 — — — — +60 -149 -54 56.3% +0.54 11–7 (61%) 6–7 (46%) 102.0 -4.63
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1977 1833 152.1 — — — — +43 -24 +83 58.8% +0.77 11–5 (69%) 7–10 (41%) 99.8 -3.05
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1978 1917 150.2 — — — — +30 -70 — 61.5% +0.80 8–5 (62%) 7–7 (50%) 100.3 -2.30
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1979 1890 140.1 — — — — +29 — -26 63.9% +1.27 3–4 (43%) 4–6 (40%) 94.4 +0.36
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1980 1952 152.7 — — — — +46 — -133 61.7% +0.71 9–7 (56%) 8–6 (57%) 103.3 -2.36
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1981 1789 132.9 — — — — +6 — — 47.3% -0.27 3–5 (38%) 4–3 (57%) 96.4 -1.03
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1982 1698 127.1 — — — — +10 +75 — 31.4% -1.04 1–2 (33%) 1–5 (17%) 94.4 -1.57
35 1968 1501 108.5 — — — — — +4 +26 50.0% -0.21 1–0 — — +0.71 1983 1698 117.4 — — — — +8 — — 53.8% +0.46 1–0 0–1 — +0.55
36 1969 1595 113.1 — — — — — -43 -15 51.0% +0.12 3–2 (60%) — — -0.11 1984 1740 119.9 — — — — +6 — — 66.7% +0.44 1–0 1–0 — -0.67
37 1970 1591 116.8 — — — — +42 -23 — 50.0% +0.19 2–2 (50%) 1–0 — +1.20 1985 1742 103.0 — — — — — — — 50.0% -1.25 — 1–0 — -0.35
38 1971 1585 105.7 — — — — — -5 — 36.4% -1.18 1–0 0–1 — +0.51 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
49 1982 1575 99.5 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.50 — — — -0.08 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1635 114.6 — — — — +42 -25 +11 48.4% -0.15 7–4 (64%) 1–1 — +4.74 — 2053 152.2 — — — — +26 -133 +21 56.9% +0.55 106–87 (55%) 75–86 (47%) 96.1 -4.86

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.