H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Luiz Mattar vs Claudio Mezzadri H2H: 1-1
Luiz Mattar and Claudio Mezzadri are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on clay. Most recently, Luiz Mattar won the 1992 Florence third round 6-4 7-6(5).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
BRA
Age 62
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
SUI
Age 61
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 11, 1992* | Florence | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Luiz Mattar | 6-4 7-6(5) | Claudio Mezzadri | Match data |
| May 9, 1992* | Charlotte | ATP 250 | SF | Clay | Claudio Mezzadri | 6-3 3-6 7-5 | Luiz Mattar | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Luiz Mattar | #888 | #29 | 796 | 1,772 | 176 | 161 | 52.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 7 |
| Claudio Mezzadri | #1,238 | #26 | 539 | 1,795 | 105 | 131 | 44.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Luiz Mattar | Claudio Mezzadri | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1983 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #831 | 1,482 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1984 | 7–11 | 38.9% | #151 | 1,503 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1985 | 5–8 | 38.5% | #135 | 1,513 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1986 | 12–16 | 42.9% | #138 | 1,584 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1986 | 6–7 | 46.2% | #95 | 1,566 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 25–16 | 61.0% | #28 | 1,767 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 1987 | 24–17 | 58.5% | #38 | 1,696 | 0 | 1 | 1988 | 13–15 | 46.4% | #105 | 1,658 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 1988 | 19–16 | 54.3% | #44 | 1,691 | 0 | 2 | 1989 | 10–14 | 41.7% | #230 | 1,580 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 1989 | 23–15 | 60.5% | #62 | 1,684 | 0 | 4 | 1990 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #305 | 1,584 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 1990 | 25–18 | 58.1% | #43 | 1,696 | 0 | 5 | 1991 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #127 | 1,589 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 1991 | 17–24 | 41.5% | #113 | 1,635 | 0 | 5 | 1992 | 13–16 | 44.8% | #97 | 1,596 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 1992 | 21–16 | 56.8% | #51 | 1,718 | 0 | 6 | 1993 | 12–22 | 35.3% | #134 | 1,518 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 1993 | 19–22 | 46.3% | #70 | 1,691 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 1994 | 20–18 | 52.6% | #73 | 1,696 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 1995 | 2–8 | 20.0% | #404 | 1,593 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |