H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Luiz Mattar vs Claudio Pistolesi H2H: 1-0
Luiz Mattar holds a 1–0 lead over Claudio Pistolesi in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Luiz Mattar leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Luiz Mattar won the 1990 Hamburg Masters second round 6-4 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
BRA
Age 62
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
ITA
Age 58
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 9, 1990* | Hamburg Masters | Masters 1000 | R64 | Clay | Luiz Mattar | 6-4 7-5 | Claudio Pistolesi | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Luiz Mattar | #888 | #29 | 796 | 1,772 | 176 | 161 | 52.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 7 |
| Claudio Pistolesi | #1,367 | #71 | 436 | 1,666 | 75 | 109 | 40.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Luiz Mattar | Claudio Pistolesi | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1985 | 4–3 | 57.1% | #211 | 1,548 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1986 | 7–12 | 36.8% | #179 | 1,572 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1987 | 12–13 | 48.0% | #97 | 1,599 | 0 | 1 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1988 | 12–17 | 41.4% | #112 | 1,587 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1989 | 12–11 | 52.2% | #95 | 1,632 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 1986 | 6–7 | 46.2% | #95 | 1,566 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 8–18 | 30.8% | #114 | 1,561 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 1987 | 24–17 | 58.5% | #38 | 1,696 | 0 | 1 | 1991 | 5–13 | 27.8% | #116 | 1,531 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 1988 | 19–16 | 54.3% | #44 | 1,691 | 0 | 2 | 1992 | 9–15 | 37.5% | #124 | 1,560 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 1989 | 23–15 | 60.5% | #62 | 1,684 | 0 | 4 | 1993 | 6–7 | 46.2% | #183 | 1,584 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 1990 | 25–18 | 58.1% | #43 | 1,696 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 1991 | 17–24 | 41.5% | #113 | 1,635 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 1992 | 21–16 | 56.8% | #51 | 1,718 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 1993 | 19–22 | 46.3% | #70 | 1,691 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 1994 | 20–18 | 52.6% | #73 | 1,696 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 1995 | 2–8 | 20.0% | #404 | 1,593 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |