H2H data updated: 2026-09-03 00:00 UTC

Luiz Mattar vs Danie Visser H2H: 0-2

Danie Visser holds a 2–0 lead over Luiz Mattar in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Danie Visser leads 1–0 on grass and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Danie Visser won the 1989 Indian Wells Open round of 64 3-6 6-3 6-1.

BRA Age 63 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
0 2
2 main draw meetings
RSA Age 65 Left-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Danie Visser #132 3-6 6-3 6-1 Luiz Mattar #46 Match data Mar 15, 1989* R64 Indian Wells Open ATP 500 Hard
Danie Visser #85 3-6 7-6 6-4 6-4 Luiz Mattar #84 Match data Jun 24, 1987* R128 Wimbledon Grand Slam Grass

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Luiz Mattar #888 #29 796 1,766 176 163 51.9% 0 0 0 0 7 7
Danie Visser #749 #59 191 1,709 92 129 41.6% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Luiz Mattar Danie Visser
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
19 1981 1–2 33.3% 1,506 0 0
20 1982 7–18 28.0% #93 1,483 0 0
21 1983 7–12 36.8% #138 1,495 0 0
22 1986 6–7 46.2% #95 1,567 0 0 1984 13–14 48.1% #72 1,618 0 0
23 1987 24–17 58.5% #38 1,696 0 1 1985 13–20 39.4% #145 1,642 0 0
24 1988 19–17 52.8% #44 1,678 0 2 1986 15–14 51.7% #83 1,676 0 0
25 1989 23–15 60.5% #62 1,681 0 4 1987 11–16 40.7% #136 1,635 0 0
26 1990 25–18 58.1% #43 1,696 0 5 1988 9–13 40.9% #143 1,591 0 0
27 1991 17–24 41.5% #113 1,632 0 5 1989 10–13 43.5% #141 1,621 0 0
28 1992 21–17 55.3% #51 1,713 0 6 1990 5–5 50.0% #197 1,652 0 0
29 1993 19–22 46.3% #70 1,691 0 6 1991 1–2 33.3% #405 1,642 0 0
30 1994 20–18 52.6% #73 1,697 0 7
31 1995 2–8 20.0% #404 1,594 0 7

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Luiz Mattar Danie Visser
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
19 1981 1 2 3 33.3%
20 1982 3 7 10 30.0% 1 6 7 14.3% 2 4 6 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0%
21 1983 6 6 12 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
22 1986 1 2 3 33.3% 5 5 10 50.0% 1984 7 9 16 43.8% 1 2 3 33.3% 5 3 8 62.5%
23 1987 16 5 21 76.2% 8 10 18 44.4% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1985 6 9 15 40.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 6 8 14 42.9% 0 2 2 0.0%
24 1988 8 8 16 50.0% 11 8 19 57.9% 0 1 1 0.0% 1986 8 8 16 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 7 4 11 63.6% 0 1 1 0.0%
25 1989 7 5 12 58.3% 9 9 18 50.0% 7 1 8 87.5% 1987 6 7 13 46.2% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 6 10 40.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
26 1990 8 5 13 61.5% 7 10 17 41.2% 0 1 1 0.0% 10 2 12 83.3% 1988 4 7 11 36.4% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 3 2 5 60.0%
27 1991 12 13 25 48.0% 3 7 10 30.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1989 6 9 15 40.0% 4 4 8 50.0%
28 1992 7 5 12 58.3% 14 11 25 56.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1990 3 2 5 60.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0%
29 1993 15 13 28 53.6% 4 8 12 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 1991 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
30 1994 9 8 17 52.9% 10 8 18 55.6% 1 2 3 33.3%
31 1995 0 5 5 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0%
Career 83 69 152 54.6% 71 76 147 48.3% 1 6 7 14.3% 21 12 33 63.6% 51 67 118 43.2% 4 15 19 21.1% 31 36 67 46.3% 6 11 17 35.3%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 143/168 of Luiz Mattar's and 3/3 of Danie Visser's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Luiz Mattar Danie Visser
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
27 1991 36/41 5.0 2.1 58.4% 66.6% 49.4% 53.2% 43.5% 59.5% 37.0% —/—
28 1992 34/38 6.4 2.0 56.2% 71.6% 53.0% 64.9% 45.9% 63.5% 37.5% —/—
29 1993 35/41 5.8 2.5 55.1% 69.5% 50.3% 59.1% 40.1% 60.7% 35.3% 1991 3/3 7.3 1.3 63.8% 64.9% 49.3% 70.2% 8.3% 59.1% 26.6%
30 1994 28/38 4.5 1.8 59.1% 67.2% 50.6% 55.4% 35.7% 60.5% 36.2% —/—
31 1995 10/10 2.9 1.3 61.4% 61.9% 57.0% 69.4% 53.6% 60.1% 28.4% —/—
Career 143/339 5.3 2.1 57.4% 68.3% 51.2% 59.0% 42.4% 61.0% 36.0% 3/221 7.3 1.3 63.8% 64.9% 49.3% 70.2% 8.3% 59.1% 26.6%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Luiz Mattar Danie Visser
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
19 1981 1507 107.7 +43 50.0% -0.63 0–2 2–0 +0.01
20 1982 1483 114.0 +43 -13 +61 39.7% -0.84 1–9 (10%) 9–7 (56%) +1.20
21 1983 1496 111.4 +39 -38 42.3% -0.17 3–5 (38%) 5–5 (50%) +1.59
22 1986 1567 121.0 -54 +30 50.0% 0.00 2–4 (33%) 4–5 (44%) -0.15 1984 1618 134.7 -27 -150 +4 50.0% -0.04 7–7 (50%) 5–8 (38%) -0.82
23 1987 1697 124.2 -13 -71 52.8% -0.01 12–5 (71%) 9–8 (53%) +3.23 1985 1643 120.9 -82 +8 42.9% -0.37 4–6 (40%) 7–11 (39%) +0.53
24 1988 1679 135.5 -65 +52 52.9% +0.34 4–2 (67%) 4–4 (50%) -0.58 1986 1676 124.7 -64 +38 51.4% -0.11 4–5 (44%) 6–7 (46%) +0.55
25 1989 1682 126.0 +17 -25 57.4% +0.47 6–7 (46%) 6–12 (33%) +3.17 1987 1635 124.7 -10 +22 43.4% -0.35 3–4 (43%) 10–7 (59%) -1.15
26 1990 1697 127.6 +63 -53 54.5% +0.21 10–6 (63%) 6–6 (50%) +2.59 1988 1591 112.9 -2 +38 41.4% -0.38 4–3 (57%) 3–6 (33%) +1.16
27 1991 1633 123.3 -1.11 -1.85 0.913 48.4% +52 -31 -104 43.6% -0.59 3–7 (30%) 6–7 (46%) +0.26 1989 1621 129.7 -23 +15 44.4% -0.11 4–4 (50%) 7–4 (64%) -0.79
28 1992 1714 131.8 +1.84 -1.25 1.026 50.5% -3 -41 51.5% -0.02 10–6 (63%) 9–7 (56%) -0.94 1990 1652 113.0 -22 -22 51.9% -0.11 2–2 (50%) 2–2 (50%) -0.54
29 1993 1691 135.1 -0.37 -1.77 0.899 48.5% +48 -70 47.1% -0.39 7–8 (47%) 10–6 (63%) -0.03 1991 1643 108.2 -0.83 -4.21 0.649 43.6% -23 37.5% -1.25 1–1 2–1 (67%) +0.02
30 1994 1698 127.3 -0.05 -2.01 0.916 48.3% +15 -47 49.4% -0.17 8–1 (89%) 6–3 (67%) -0.26
31 1995 1594 111.7 -2.46 -4.96 0.713 45.6% +20 22.7% -1.64 0–1 2–2 (50%) +0.33
Career 1766 133.5 -0.11 -1.94 0.921 48.7% +20 -30 -104 50.4% -0.07 62–47 (57%) 62–60 (51%) 104.7 +2.25 1710 127.9 -0.83 -4.21 0.649 43.6% -19 -50 +21 44.9% -0.31 33–48 (41%) 58–58 (50%) 100.6 +0.80

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.