H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Luiz Mattar vs David Nainkin H2H: 0-2
David Nainkin holds a 2–0 lead over Luiz Mattar in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, David Nainkin leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, David Nainkin won the 1994 Memphis second round 6-1 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
BRA
Age 62
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
0
–
2
2 main draw meetings
RSA
Age 55
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 9, 1994* | Memphis | ATP 250 | R64 | Hard | David Nainkin | 6-1 6-2 | Luiz Mattar | Match data |
| Mar 13, 1993* | Miami Masters | Masters 1000 | R128 | Hard | David Nainkin | 6-1 4-6 6-2 | Luiz Mattar | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Luiz Mattar | #888 | #29 | 796 | 1,772 | 176 | 161 | 52.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 7 |
| David Nainkin | #910 | #132 | 350 | 1,628 | 26 | 43 | 37.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Luiz Mattar | David Nainkin | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1992 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #261 | 1,513 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1986 | 6–7 | 46.2% | #95 | 1,566 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #163 | 1,528 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1987 | 24–17 | 58.5% | #38 | 1,696 | 0 | 1 | 1994 | 3–10 | 23.1% | #176 | 1,487 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1988 | 19–16 | 54.3% | #44 | 1,691 | 0 | 2 | 1995 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #173 | 1,522 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1989 | 23–15 | 60.5% | #62 | 1,684 | 0 | 4 | 1996 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #172 | 1,510 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1990 | 25–18 | 58.1% | #43 | 1,696 | 0 | 5 | 1997 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #282 | 1,533 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 1991 | 17–24 | 41.5% | #113 | 1,635 | 0 | 5 | 1998 | 7–9 | 43.8% | #136 | 1,615 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 1992 | 21–16 | 56.8% | #51 | 1,718 | 0 | 6 | 1999 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #713 | 1,602 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 1993 | 19–22 | 46.3% | #70 | 1,691 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 1994 | 20–18 | 52.6% | #73 | 1,696 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 1995 | 2–8 | 20.0% | #404 | 1,593 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |