Luiz Mattar
all rivalries →| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thomas Muster | 1 | 5 | 6 | Oct 15, 1994 | H2H |
| Horacio de la Pena | 3 | 3 | 6 | May 19, 1994 | H2H |
| Alberto Mancini | 3 | 3 | 6 | Oct 28, 1993 | H2H |
| Cassio Motta | 4 | 2 | 6 | Nov 9, 1990 | H2H |
| Mark Woodforde | 2 | 3 | 5 | May 14, 1994 | H2H |
H2H data updated: 2026-09-03 00:00 UTC
Luiz Mattar and David Pate are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Luiz Mattar leads 1–0 on clay, while David Pate leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Luiz Mattar won the 1989 Charleston round of 32 6-7 6-4 6-0.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Luiz Mattar | 6-7 6-4 6-0 | David Pate | Match data | May 11, 1989* | R32 | Charleston | ATP 250 | Clay |
| David Pate | 6-2 6-7 6-3 | Luiz Mattar | Match data | Mar 2, 1988* | R64 | Indian Wells Open | ATP 500 | Hard |
Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Luiz Mattar | #888 | #29 | 796 | 1,766 | 176 | 163 | 51.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 7 |
| David Pate | #911 | #18 | 441 | 1,875 | 181 | 168 | 51.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Luiz Mattar | David Pate | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1981 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,493 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1982 | 2–5 | 28.6% | — | 1,484 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1983 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #203 | 1,529 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1986 | 6–7 | 46.2% | #95 | 1,567 | 0 | 0 | 1984 | 21–13 | 61.8% | #30 | 1,743 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 1987 | 24–17 | 58.5% | #38 | 1,696 | 0 | 1 | 1985 | 31–24 | 56.4% | #26 | 1,742 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 1988 | 19–17 | 52.8% | #44 | 1,678 | 0 | 2 | 1986 | 35–23 | 60.3% | #30 | 1,788 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 1989 | 23–15 | 60.5% | #62 | 1,681 | 0 | 4 | 1987 | 28–18 | 60.9% | #18 | 1,750 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | 1990 | 25–18 | 58.1% | #43 | 1,696 | 0 | 5 | 1988 | 20–16 | 55.6% | #47 | 1,715 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | 1991 | 17–24 | 41.5% | #113 | 1,632 | 0 | 5 | 1989 | 9–19 | 32.1% | #157 | 1,656 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | 1992 | 21–17 | 55.3% | #51 | 1,713 | 0 | 6 | 1990 | 16–15 | 51.6% | #94 | 1,657 | 0 | 2 |
| 29 | 1993 | 19–22 | 46.3% | #70 | 1,691 | 0 | 6 | 1991 | 11–18 | 37.9% | #160 | 1,596 | 0 | 2 |
| 30 | 1994 | 20–18 | 52.6% | #73 | 1,697 | 0 | 7 | 1992 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #396 | 1,573 | 0 | 2 |
| 31 | 1995 | 2–8 | 20.0% | #404 | 1,594 | 0 | 7 | 1993 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #514 | 1,548 | 0 | 2 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1994 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #624 | 1,561 | 0 | 2 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1995 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #911 | 1,542 | 0 | 2 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.
| Age | Luiz Mattar | David Pate | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | |||
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1981 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1982 | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1983 | 3 | 4 | 7 | 42.9% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 1986 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 5 | 5 | 10 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1984 | 18 | 6 | 24 | 75.0% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% |
| 23 | 1987 | 16 | 5 | 21 | 76.2% | 8 | 10 | 18 | 44.4% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 1985 | 15 | 11 | 26 | 57.7% | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% | 7 | 4 | 11 | 63.6% | 7 | 8 | 15 | 46.7% |
| 24 | 1988 | 8 | 8 | 16 | 50.0% | 11 | 8 | 19 | 57.9% | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 1986 | 20 | 11 | 31 | 64.5% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 4 | 3 | 7 | 57.1% | 11 | 8 | 19 | 57.9% |
| 25 | 1989 | 7 | 5 | 12 | 58.3% | 9 | 9 | 18 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | 7 | 1 | 8 | 87.5% | 1987 | 18 | 10 | 28 | 64.3% | — | — | — | — | 5 | 3 | 8 | 62.5% | 5 | 5 | 10 | 50.0% |
| 26 | 1990 | 8 | 5 | 13 | 61.5% | 7 | 10 | 17 | 41.2% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 10 | 2 | 12 | 83.3% | 1988 | 16 | 11 | 27 | 59.3% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% |
| 27 | 1991 | 12 | 13 | 25 | 48.0% | 3 | 7 | 10 | 30.0% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 1989 | 6 | 14 | 20 | 30.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% |
| 28 | 1992 | 7 | 5 | 12 | 58.3% | 14 | 11 | 25 | 56.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 1990 | 7 | 10 | 17 | 41.2% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 5 | 2 | 7 | 71.4% | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% |
| 29 | 1993 | 15 | 13 | 28 | 53.6% | 4 | 8 | 12 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 1991 | 6 | 10 | 16 | 37.5% | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 4 | 3 | 7 | 57.1% |
| 30 | 1994 | 9 | 8 | 17 | 52.9% | 10 | 8 | 18 | 55.6% | — | — | — | — | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 1992 | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 1995 | 0 | 5 | 5 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | 1993 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1994 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1995 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 83 | 69 | 152 | 54.6% | 71 | 76 | 147 | 48.3% | 1 | 6 | 7 | 14.3% | 21 | 12 | 33 | 63.6% | — | 113 | 98 | 211 | 53.6% | 5 | 13 | 18 | 27.8% | 31 | 26 | 57 | 54.4% | 32 | 31 | 63 | 50.8% |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Age | Luiz Mattar | David Pate | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1981 | 1494 | 104.5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.0% | -1.00 | — | 0–2 | — | -0.08 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1982 | 1485 | 108.5 | — | — | — | — | +40 | — | — | 31.6% | -1.00 | 1–0 | 1–0 | — | +0.29 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1983 | 1529 | 119.4 | — | — | — | — | +10 | — | +62 | 37.9% | -0.24 | 2–1 (67%) | 2–8 (20%) | — | +0.28 |
| 22 | 1986 | 1567 | 121.0 | — | — | — | — | -54 | +30 | — | 50.0% | 0.00 | 2–4 (33%) | 4–5 (44%) | — | -0.15 | 1984 | 1744 | 140.4 | — | — | — | — | +36 | -218 | -186 | 59.5% | +0.43 | 3–5 (38%) | 4–4 (50%) | — | +0.33 |
| 23 | 1987 | 1697 | 124.2 | — | — | — | — | -13 | -71 | — | 52.8% | -0.01 | 12–5 (71%) | 9–8 (53%) | — | +3.23 | 1985 | 1743 | 138.8 | — | — | — | — | +29 | -206 | -84 | 52.4% | +0.13 | 17–9 (65%) | 15–13 (54%) | — | +0.85 |
| 24 | 1988 | 1679 | 135.5 | — | — | — | — | -65 | +52 | — | 52.9% | +0.34 | 4–2 (67%) | 4–4 (50%) | — | -0.58 | 1986 | 1788 | 146.3 | — | — | — | — | +34 | — | -115 | 58.3% | +0.59 | 8–7 (53%) | 9–9 (50%) | — | +0.85 |
| 25 | 1989 | 1682 | 126.0 | — | — | — | — | +17 | -25 | — | 57.4% | +0.47 | 6–7 (46%) | 6–12 (33%) | — | +3.17 | 1987 | 1751 | 141.1 | — | — | — | — | +30 | — | -55 | 61.5% | +0.54 | 6–11 (35%) | 18–11 (62%) | — | -0.04 |
| 26 | 1990 | 1697 | 127.6 | — | — | — | — | +63 | -53 | — | 54.5% | +0.21 | 10–6 (63%) | 6–6 (50%) | — | +2.59 | 1988 | 1716 | 139.3 | — | — | — | — | +41 | — | -25 | 52.7% | +0.32 | 7–5 (58%) | 7–11 (39%) | — | -1.56 |
| 27 | 1991 | 1633 | 123.3 | -1.11 | -1.85 | 0.913 | 48.4% | +52 | -31 | -104 | 43.6% | -0.59 | 3–7 (30%) | 6–7 (46%) | — | +0.26 | 1989 | 1656 | 135.9 | — | — | — | — | +19 | — | +63 | 35.5% | -1.12 | 5–5 (50%) | 5–8 (38%) | — | -2.42 |
| 28 | 1992 | 1714 | 131.8 | +1.84 | -1.25 | 1.026 | 50.5% | -3 | -41 | — | 51.5% | -0.02 | 10–6 (63%) | 9–7 (56%) | — | -0.94 | 1990 | 1658 | 127.8 | — | — | — | — | -22 | — | +129 | 50.6% | +0.33 | 6–5 (55%) | 7–8 (47%) | — | +0.85 |
| 29 | 1993 | 1691 | 135.1 | -0.37 | -1.77 | 0.899 | 48.5% | +48 | -70 | — | 47.1% | -0.39 | 7–8 (47%) | 10–6 (63%) | — | -0.03 | 1991 | 1596 | 133.2 | — | — | — | — | +31 | -112 | +179 | 40.3% | -0.61 | 5–6 (45%) | 3–7 (30%) | — | -0.86 |
| 30 | 1994 | 1698 | 127.3 | -0.05 | -2.01 | 0.916 | 48.3% | +15 | -47 | — | 49.4% | -0.17 | 8–1 (89%) | 6–3 (67%) | — | -0.26 | 1992 | 1574 | 104.4 | — | — | — | — | +24 | — | — | 28.6% | -1.57 | 1–1 | 2–1 (67%) | — | -0.43 |
| 31 | 1995 | 1594 | 111.7 | -2.46 | -4.96 | 0.713 | 45.6% | +20 | — | — | 22.7% | -1.64 | 0–1 | 2–2 (50%) | — | +0.33 | 1993 | 1548 | 104.3 | — | — | — | — | +35 | — | — | 33.3% | -0.78 | 0–1 | 0–2 | — | +0.22 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1994 | 1561 | 100.6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 40.0% | -2.20 | 1–0 | — | — | -0.12 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1995 | 1542 | 99.0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 33.3% | -1.00 | 0–1 | — | — | +0.14 |
| Career | — | 1766 | 133.5 | -0.11 | -1.94 | 0.921 | 48.7% | +20 | -30 | -104 | 50.4% | -0.07 | 62–47 (57%) | 62–60 (51%) | 104.7 | +2.25 | — | 1875 | 143.1 | — | — | — | — | +27 | -183 | -21 | 50.8% | +0.06 | 62–57 (52%) | 73–84 (46%) | 98.7 | -0.49 |
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thomas Muster | 1 | 5 | 6 | Oct 15, 1994 | H2H |
| Horacio de la Pena | 3 | 3 | 6 | May 19, 1994 | H2H |
| Alberto Mancini | 3 | 3 | 6 | Oct 28, 1993 | H2H |
| Cassio Motta | 4 | 2 | 6 | Nov 9, 1990 | H2H |
| Mark Woodforde | 2 | 3 | 5 | May 14, 1994 | H2H |
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Brad Gilbert | 5 | 5 | 10 | Sep 21, 1989 | H2H |
| Stefan Edberg | 2 | 7 | 9 | Oct 10, 1991 | H2H |
| Larry Stefanki | 2 | 4 | 6 | Feb 27, 1986 | H2H |
| Wally Masur | 1 | 4 | 5 | Apr 8, 1992 | H2H |
| Boris Becker | 0 | 5 | 5 | Aug 15, 1991 | H2H |