Luiz Mattar
all rivalries →| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thomas Muster | 1 | 5 | 6 | Oct 15, 1994 | H2H |
| Horacio de la Pena | 3 | 3 | 6 | May 19, 1994 | H2H |
| Alberto Mancini | 3 | 3 | 6 | Oct 28, 1993 | H2H |
| Cassio Motta | 4 | 2 | 6 | Nov 9, 1990 | H2H |
| Mark Woodforde | 2 | 3 | 5 | May 14, 1994 | H2H |
H2H data updated: 2026-09-01 00:00 UTC
Luiz Mattar vs Grant Connell H2H: 0-2
Grant Connell holds a 2–0 lead over Luiz Mattar in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Grant Connell leads 1–0 on carpet and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Grant Connell won the 1991 Chicago round of 16 6-1 6-7(3) 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H
0
–
2
2 main draw meetings
H2H Match Log
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grant Connell | 6-1 6-7(3) 6-3 | Luiz Mattar | Match data | Mar 1, 1991* | R16 | Chicago | ATP World Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 | Carpet |
| Grant Connell | 6-3 6-0 | Luiz Mattar | Match data | Feb 21, 1991* | R32 | Memphis | ATP Championship Series → modern equivalent ATP 500 | Hard |
Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Luiz Mattar | #888 | #29 | 796 | 1,766 | 176 | 163 | 51.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 7 |
| Grant Connell | #1,367 | #67 | 517 | 1,755 | 67 | 97 | 40.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Luiz Mattar | Grant Connell | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1984 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #555 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1985 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #570 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1987 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #123 | 1,472 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1986 | 6–7 | 46.2% | #95 | 1,567 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 10–17 | 37.0% | #134 | 1,527 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1987 | 24–17 | 58.5% | #38 | 1,696 | 0 | 1 | 1989 | 8–11 | 42.1% | #94 | 1,592 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1988 | 19–17 | 52.8% | #44 | 1,678 | 0 | 2 | 1990 | 19–21 | 47.5% | #92 | 1,667 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1989 | 23–15 | 60.5% | #62 | 1,681 | 0 | 4 | 1991 | 20–21 | 48.8% | #79 | 1,666 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1990 | 25–18 | 58.1% | #43 | 1,696 | 0 | 5 | 1992 | 8–16 | 33.3% | #186 | 1,572 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 1991 | 17–24 | 41.5% | #113 | 1,632 | 0 | 5 | 1993 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #946 | 1,562 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 1992 | 21–17 | 55.3% | #51 | 1,713 | 0 | 6 | 1994 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #318 | 1,600 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 1993 | 19–22 | 46.3% | #70 | 1,691 | 0 | 6 | 1995 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #713 | 1,551 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 1994 | 20–18 | 52.6% | #73 | 1,697 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 1995 | 2–8 | 20.0% | #404 | 1,594 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Surface Results by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.
| Age | Luiz Mattar | Grant Connell | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | |||
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1984 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1985 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1987 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 1986 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 5 | 5 | 10 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1988 | 9 | 13 | 22 | 40.9% | — | — | — | — | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% |
| 23 | 1987 | 16 | 5 | 21 | 76.2% | 8 | 10 | 18 | 44.4% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 1989 | 6 | 9 | 15 | 40.0% | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% |
| 24 | 1988 | 8 | 8 | 16 | 50.0% | 11 | 8 | 19 | 57.9% | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 1990 | 16 | 16 | 32 | 50.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% |
| 25 | 1989 | 7 | 5 | 12 | 58.3% | 9 | 9 | 18 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | 7 | 1 | 8 | 87.5% | 1991 | 13 | 14 | 27 | 48.1% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% | 4 | 4 | 8 | 50.0% |
| 26 | 1990 | 8 | 5 | 13 | 61.5% | 7 | 10 | 17 | 41.2% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 10 | 2 | 12 | 83.3% | 1992 | 7 | 11 | 18 | 38.9% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% |
| 27 | 1991 | 12 | 13 | 25 | 48.0% | 3 | 7 | 10 | 30.0% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 1993 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 1992 | 7 | 5 | 12 | 58.3% | 14 | 11 | 25 | 56.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 1994 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 29 | 1993 | 15 | 13 | 28 | 53.6% | 4 | 8 | 12 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 1995 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 1994 | 9 | 8 | 17 | 52.9% | 10 | 8 | 18 | 55.6% | — | — | — | — | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 1995 | 0 | 5 | 5 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 83 | 69 | 152 | 54.6% | 71 | 76 | 147 | 48.3% | 1 | 6 | 7 | 14.3% | 21 | 12 | 33 | 63.6% | — | 51 | 70 | 121 | 42.1% | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | 6 | 11 | 17 | 35.3% | 10 | 13 | 23 | 43.5% |
Performance Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 143/168 of Luiz Mattar's and 65/75 of Grant Connell's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.
| Age | Luiz Mattar | Grant Connell | ||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | |
| 25 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1991 | 36/41 | 5.4 | 3.0 | 58.5% | 71.4% | 51.2% | 65.0% | 37.8% | 63.0% | 36.6% |
| 26 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1992 | 20/24 | 5.4 | 3.4 | 58.7% | 71.8% | 50.4% | 63.2% | 24.3% | 63.0% | 33.5% |
| 27 | 1991 | 36/41 | 5.0 | 2.1 | 58.4% | 66.6% | 49.4% | 53.2% | 43.5% | 59.5% | 37.0% | 1993 | 1/1 | 7.0 | 5.0 | 53.6% | 68.9% | 43.6% | 60.0% | 50.0% | 57.1% | 37.9% |
| 28 | 1992 | 34/38 | 6.4 | 2.0 | 56.2% | 71.6% | 53.0% | 64.9% | 45.9% | 63.5% | 37.5% | 1994 | 6/6 | 6.2 | 1.8 | 63.5% | 74.1% | 41.9% | 66.1% | 9.5% | 62.7% | 33.5% |
| 29 | 1993 | 35/41 | 5.8 | 2.5 | 55.1% | 69.5% | 50.3% | 59.1% | 40.1% | 60.7% | 35.3% | 1995 | 2/3 | 2.0 | 4.5 | 52.6% | 62.7% | 43.3% | 50.0% | 66.7% | 53.7% | 31.9% |
| 30 | 1994 | 28/38 | 4.5 | 1.8 | 59.1% | 67.2% | 50.6% | 55.4% | 35.7% | 60.5% | 36.2% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 1995 | 10/10 | 2.9 | 1.3 | 61.4% | 61.9% | 57.0% | 69.4% | 53.6% | 60.1% | 28.4% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 143/339 | 5.3 | 2.1 | 57.4% | 68.3% | 51.2% | 59.0% | 42.4% | 61.0% | 36.0% | — | 65/164 | 5.4 | 3.1 | 58.8% | 71.4% | 49.7% | 64.0% | 32.1% | 62.6% | 35.2% |
Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Age | Luiz Mattar | Grant Connell | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1984 | 1497 | 100.4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.0% | -2.50 | — | — | — | -0.16 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1985 | 1491 | 104.3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.0% | -2.00 | — | 0–1 | — | -0.04 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1987 | 1472 | 98.7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.0% | -2.00 | — | — | — | +0.10 |
| 22 | 1986 | 1567 | 121.0 | — | — | — | — | -54 | +30 | — | 50.0% | 0.00 | 2–4 (33%) | 4–5 (44%) | — | -0.15 | 1988 | 1527 | 117.0 | — | — | — | — | +11 | — | — | 41.3% | -0.34 | 5–10 (33%) | 3–6 (33%) | — | +0.47 |
| 23 | 1987 | 1697 | 124.2 | — | — | — | — | -13 | -71 | — | 52.8% | -0.01 | 12–5 (71%) | 9–8 (53%) | — | +3.23 | 1989 | 1593 | 135.1 | — | — | — | — | +24 | — | — | 47.1% | -0.06 | 3–6 (33%) | 4–6 (40%) | — | +0.27 |
| 24 | 1988 | 1679 | 135.5 | — | — | — | — | -65 | +52 | — | 52.9% | +0.34 | 4–2 (67%) | 4–4 (50%) | — | -0.58 | 1990 | 1667 | 139.1 | — | — | — | — | +42 | — | -147 | 47.4% | -0.08 | 5–8 (38%) | 7–10 (41%) | — | -1.46 |
| 25 | 1989 | 1682 | 126.0 | — | — | — | — | +17 | -25 | — | 57.4% | +0.47 | 6–7 (46%) | 6–12 (33%) | — | +3.17 | 1991 | 1667 | 133.7 | +1.73 | -1.76 | 0.990 | 50.0% | +16 | — | -109 | 48.6% | -0.20 | 9–7 (56%) | 10–12 (45%) | — | -0.90 |
| 26 | 1990 | 1697 | 127.6 | — | — | — | — | +63 | -53 | — | 54.5% | +0.21 | 10–6 (63%) | 6–6 (50%) | — | +2.59 | 1992 | 1573 | 125.0 | +0.70 | -2.70 | 0.904 | 48.7% | +25 | — | — | 37.3% | -0.74 | 3–6 (33%) | 5–10 (33%) | — | -0.07 |
| 27 | 1991 | 1633 | 123.3 | -1.11 | -1.85 | 0.913 | 48.4% | +52 | -31 | -104 | 43.6% | -0.59 | 3–7 (30%) | 6–7 (46%) | — | +0.26 | 1993 | 1562 | 103.6 | +1.33 | -0.62 | 0.884 | 48.7% | — | — | — | 0.0% | -2.00 | — | — | — | -0.08 |
| 28 | 1992 | 1714 | 131.8 | +1.84 | -1.25 | 1.026 | 50.5% | -3 | -41 | — | 51.5% | -0.02 | 10–6 (63%) | 9–7 (56%) | — | -0.94 | 1994 | 1601 | 111.5 | +0.44 | -0.56 | 0.898 | 48.1% | -53 | — | -5 | 37.5% | -0.87 | — | 1–1 | — | -0.45 |
| 29 | 1993 | 1691 | 135.1 | -0.37 | -1.77 | 0.899 | 48.5% | +48 | -70 | — | 47.1% | -0.39 | 7–8 (47%) | 10–6 (63%) | — | -0.03 | 1995 | 1552 | 98.7 | -1.23 | -0.51 | 0.689 | 43.6% | — | — | — | 0.0% | -2.83 | — | — | — | +0.29 |
| 30 | 1994 | 1698 | 127.3 | -0.05 | -2.01 | 0.916 | 48.3% | +15 | -47 | — | 49.4% | -0.17 | 8–1 (89%) | 6–3 (67%) | — | -0.26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 1995 | 1594 | 111.7 | -2.46 | -4.96 | 0.713 | 45.6% | +20 | — | — | 22.7% | -1.64 | 0–1 | 2–2 (50%) | — | +0.33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 1766 | 133.5 | -0.11 | -1.94 | 0.921 | 48.7% | +20 | -30 | -104 | 50.4% | -0.07 | 62–47 (57%) | 62–60 (51%) | 104.7 | +2.25 | — | 1756 | 134.7 | +1.20 | -1.88 | 0.942 | 49.2% | +23 | — | -91 | 43.1% | -0.36 | 25–37 (40%) | 30–46 (39%) | 92.5 | -1.24 |
Career Rivalries
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
Grant Connell
all rivalries →| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aaron Krickstein | 2 | 3 | 5 | Oct 3, 1991 | H2H |
| Derrick Rostagno | 2 | 2 | 4 | Jun 14, 1995 | H2H |
| Michael Chang | 0 | 4 | 4 | Jun 26, 1994 | H2H |
| Jaime Yzaga | 2 | 2 | 4 | Jun 24, 1994 | H2H |
| John Fitzgerald | 2 | 2 | 4 | Apr 2, 1992 | H2H |