H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Luiz Mattar vs Jaime Oncins H2H: 4-0
Luiz Mattar holds a 4–0 lead over Jaime Oncins in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Luiz Mattar leads 2–0 on carpet and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Luiz Mattar won the 1992 Sao Paulo final 6-1 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
BRA
Age 62
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
4
–
0
4 main draw meetings
BRA
Age 56
Right-Handed
196 cm / 6'5"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 15, 1992* | Sao Paulo | ATP 250 | F | Hard | Luiz Mattar | 6-1 6-4 | Jaime Oncins | Match data |
| Feb 6, 1992* | Maceio | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Luiz Mattar | 7-6(6) 5-7 6-1 | Jaime Oncins | Match data |
| Apr 5, 1990* | Rio de Janeiro | ATP 250 | R32 | Carpet | Luiz Mattar | 1-6 7-5 6-1 | Jaime Oncins | Match data |
| Apr 13, 1989* | Rio de Janeiro | ATP 250 | R32 | Carpet | Luiz Mattar | 6-1 3-6 3-0 (ret.) | Jaime Oncins | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Luiz Mattar | #888 | #29 | 796 | 1,772 | 176 | 161 | 52.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 7 |
| Jaime Oncins | #1,034 | #34 | 773 | 1,796 | 61 | 86 | 41.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Luiz Mattar | Jaime Oncins | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1988 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #314 | 1,493 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1989 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #263 | 1,471 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1990 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #113 | 1,443 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1991 | 22–17 | 56.4% | #64 | 1,677 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1986 | 6–7 | 46.2% | #95 | 1,566 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 24–18 | 57.1% | #48 | 1,765 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | 1987 | 24–17 | 58.5% | #38 | 1,696 | 0 | 1 | 1993 | 11–23 | 32.4% | #133 | 1,578 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 1988 | 19–16 | 54.3% | #44 | 1,691 | 0 | 2 | 1994 | 1–7 | 12.5% | #230 | 1,502 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 1989 | 23–15 | 60.5% | #62 | 1,684 | 0 | 4 | 1995 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #222 | 1,505 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | 1990 | 25–18 | 58.1% | #43 | 1,696 | 0 | 5 | 1996 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #160 | 1,488 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | 1991 | 17–24 | 41.5% | #113 | 1,635 | 0 | 5 | 1997 | 0–6 | 0.0% | #166 | 1,436 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | 1992 | 21–16 | 56.8% | #51 | 1,718 | 0 | 6 | 1998 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #223 | 1,448 | 0 | 2 |
| 29 | 1993 | 19–22 | 46.3% | #70 | 1,691 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 1994 | 20–18 | 52.6% | #73 | 1,696 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 1995 | 2–8 | 20.0% | #404 | 1,593 | 0 | 7 | 2001 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1031 | 1,435 | 0 | 2 |