H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Luiz Mattar vs Jerome Potier H2H: 0-1
Jerome Potier holds a 1–0 lead over Luiz Mattar in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Jerome Potier leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Jerome Potier won the 1989 Roland Garros second round 6-4 7-6 6-7 3-6 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
BRA
Age 62
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
FRA
Age 64
Left-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 2, 1989* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R64 | Clay | Jerome Potier | 6-4 7-6 6-7 3-6 6-3 | Luiz Mattar | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Luiz Mattar | #888 | #29 | 796 | 1,772 | 176 | 161 | 52.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 7 |
| Jerome Potier | #987 | #68 | 287 | 1,689 | 54 | 92 | 37.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Luiz Mattar | Jerome Potier | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1980 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #325 | 1,523 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1981 | 7–11 | 38.9% | #325 | 1,561 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1982 | 5–15 | 25.0% | #116 | 1,524 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1983 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #277 | 1,504 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1986 | 6–7 | 46.2% | #95 | 1,566 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #126 | 1,560 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1987 | 24–17 | 58.5% | #38 | 1,696 | 0 | 1 | 1986 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #339 | 1,536 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1988 | 19–16 | 54.3% | #44 | 1,691 | 0 | 2 | 1987 | 4–3 | 57.1% | #119 | 1,591 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1989 | 23–15 | 60.5% | #62 | 1,684 | 0 | 4 | 1988 | 13–23 | 36.1% | #162 | 1,529 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1990 | 25–18 | 58.1% | #43 | 1,696 | 0 | 5 | 1989 | 10–10 | 50.0% | #68 | 1,600 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 1991 | 17–24 | 41.5% | #113 | 1,635 | 0 | 5 | 1990 | 7–15 | 31.8% | #187 | 1,546 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 1992 | 21–16 | 56.8% | #51 | 1,718 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 1993 | 19–22 | 46.3% | #70 | 1,691 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 1994 | 20–18 | 52.6% | #73 | 1,696 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 1995 | 2–8 | 20.0% | #404 | 1,593 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |