H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Luiz Mattar vs Johan Kriek H2H: 0-1
Johan Kriek holds a 1–0 lead over Luiz Mattar in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Johan Kriek leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Johan Kriek won the 1986 Roland Garros third round 6-4 6-4 3-6 2-6 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
BRA
Age 62
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
USA
Age 68
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 1, 1986* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R32 | Clay | Johan Kriek | 6-4 6-4 3-6 2-6 6-3 | Luiz Mattar | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Luiz Mattar | #888 | #29 | 796 | 1,772 | 176 | 161 | 52.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 7 |
| Johan Kriek | #859 | #7 | 268 | 2,052 | 380 | 223 | 63.0% | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 12 | 14 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Luiz Mattar | Johan Kriek | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1977 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #278 | 1,510 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1978 | 22–11 | 66.7% | #27 | 1,781 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1979 | 33–22 | 60.0% | #35 | 1,879 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 1986 | 6–7 | 46.2% | #95 | 1,566 | 0 | 0 | 1980 | 39–24 | 61.9% | #17 | 1,976 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 1987 | 24–17 | 58.5% | #38 | 1,696 | 0 | 1 | 1981 | 38–15 | 71.7% | #19 | 1,955 | 1 | 4 |
| 24 | 1988 | 19–16 | 54.3% | #44 | 1,691 | 0 | 2 | 1982 | 41–21 | 66.1% | #9 | 1,960 | 2 | 7 |
| 25 | 1989 | 23–15 | 60.5% | #62 | 1,684 | 0 | 4 | 1983 | 39–19 | 67.2% | #15 | 1,952 | 2 | 10 |
| 26 | 1990 | 25–18 | 58.1% | #43 | 1,696 | 0 | 5 | 1984 | 37–17 | 68.5% | #13 | 1,916 | 2 | 12 |
| 27 | 1991 | 17–24 | 41.5% | #113 | 1,635 | 0 | 5 | 1985 | 43–21 | 67.2% | #14 | 1,907 | 2 | 13 |
| 28 | 1992 | 21–16 | 56.8% | #51 | 1,718 | 0 | 6 | 1986 | 21–14 | 60.0% | #23 | 1,880 | 2 | 13 |
| 29 | 1993 | 19–22 | 46.3% | #70 | 1,691 | 0 | 6 | 1987 | 26–20 | 56.5% | #48 | 1,737 | 2 | 14 |
| 30 | 1994 | 20–18 | 52.6% | #73 | 1,696 | 0 | 7 | 1988 | 25–18 | 58.1% | #39 | 1,788 | 2 | 14 |
| 31 | 1995 | 2–8 | 20.0% | #404 | 1,593 | 0 | 7 | 1989 | 12–10 | 54.5% | #52 | 1,700 | 2 | 14 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1990 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #413 | 1,683 | 2 | 14 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1991 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #274 | 1,611 | 2 | 14 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1992 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1097 | 1,593 | 2 | 14 |