Luiz Mattar
all rivalries →| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thomas Muster | 1 | 5 | 6 | Oct 15, 1994 | H2H |
| Horacio de la Pena | 3 | 3 | 6 | May 19, 1994 | H2H |
| Alberto Mancini | 3 | 3 | 6 | Oct 28, 1993 | H2H |
| Cassio Motta | 4 | 2 | 6 | Nov 9, 1990 | H2H |
| Mark Woodforde | 2 | 3 | 5 | May 14, 1994 | H2H |
H2H data updated: 2026-09-02 00:00 UTC
Luiz Mattar vs Mark Dickson H2H: 0-1
Mark Dickson holds a 1–0 lead over Luiz Mattar in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Mark Dickson leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Mark Dickson won the 1987 Vienna Open round of 32 6-3 6-7 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
H2H Match Log
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mark Dickson | 6-3 6-7 6-1 | Luiz Mattar | Match data | Oct 22, 1987* | R32 | Vienna Open | ATP 250 | Hard |
Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Luiz Mattar | #888 | #29 | 796 | 1,766 | 176 | 163 | 51.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 7 |
| Mark Dickson | #1,095 | #32 | 0 | 1,818 | 128 | 118 | 52.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Luiz Mattar | Mark Dickson | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1981 | 1–3 | 25.0% | — | 1,501 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1986 | 6–7 | 46.2% | #95 | 1,567 | 0 | 0 | 1982 | 14–13 | 51.9% | #41 | 1,688 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1987 | 24–17 | 58.5% | #38 | 1,696 | 0 | 1 | 1983 | 28–27 | 50.9% | #66 | 1,699 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1988 | 19–17 | 52.8% | #44 | 1,678 | 0 | 2 | 1984 | 36–22 | 62.1% | #35 | 1,812 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 1989 | 23–15 | 60.5% | #62 | 1,681 | 0 | 4 | 1985 | 23–23 | 50.0% | #74 | 1,717 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | 1990 | 25–18 | 58.1% | #43 | 1,696 | 0 | 5 | 1986 | 8–11 | 42.1% | #131 | 1,613 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | 1991 | 17–24 | 41.5% | #113 | 1,632 | 0 | 5 | 1987 | 9–10 | 47.4% | #155 | 1,619 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | 1992 | 21–17 | 55.3% | #51 | 1,713 | 0 | 6 | 1988 | 9–9 | 50.0% | #141 | 1,624 | 0 | 2 |
| 29 | 1993 | 19–22 | 46.3% | #70 | 1,691 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 1994 | 20–18 | 52.6% | #73 | 1,697 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 1995 | 2–8 | 20.0% | #404 | 1,594 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Surface Results by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.
| Age | Luiz Mattar | Mark Dickson | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | |||
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1981 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 1986 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 5 | 5 | 10 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1982 | 7 | 6 | 13 | 53.8% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | 5 | 5 | 10 | 50.0% |
| 23 | 1987 | 16 | 5 | 21 | 76.2% | 8 | 10 | 18 | 44.4% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 1983 | 7 | 4 | 11 | 63.6% | 11 | 12 | 23 | 47.8% | 1 | 4 | 5 | 20.0% | 9 | 7 | 16 | 56.3% |
| 24 | 1988 | 8 | 8 | 16 | 50.0% | 11 | 8 | 19 | 57.9% | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 1984 | 13 | 6 | 19 | 68.4% | 14 | 8 | 22 | 63.6% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 8 | 7 | 15 | 53.3% |
| 25 | 1989 | 7 | 5 | 12 | 58.3% | 9 | 9 | 18 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | 7 | 1 | 8 | 87.5% | 1985 | 6 | 10 | 16 | 37.5% | 8 | 6 | 14 | 57.1% | 5 | 2 | 7 | 71.4% | 4 | 5 | 9 | 44.4% |
| 26 | 1990 | 8 | 5 | 13 | 61.5% | 7 | 10 | 17 | 41.2% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 10 | 2 | 12 | 83.3% | 1986 | 4 | 4 | 8 | 50.0% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | — | — | — | — | 2 | 4 | 6 | 33.3% |
| 27 | 1991 | 12 | 13 | 25 | 48.0% | 3 | 7 | 10 | 30.0% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 1987 | 3 | 4 | 7 | 42.9% | 3 | 4 | 7 | 42.9% | — | — | — | — | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% |
| 28 | 1992 | 7 | 5 | 12 | 58.3% | 14 | 11 | 25 | 56.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 1988 | 3 | 6 | 9 | 33.3% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | 4 | 1 | 5 | 80.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 1993 | 15 | 13 | 28 | 53.6% | 4 | 8 | 12 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 1994 | 9 | 8 | 17 | 52.9% | 10 | 8 | 18 | 55.6% | — | — | — | — | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 1995 | 0 | 5 | 5 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 83 | 69 | 152 | 54.6% | 71 | 76 | 147 | 48.3% | 1 | 6 | 7 | 14.3% | 21 | 12 | 33 | 63.6% | — | 43 | 41 | 84 | 51.2% | 43 | 39 | 82 | 52.4% | 11 | 8 | 19 | 57.9% | 31 | 30 | 61 | 50.8% |
Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Age | Luiz Mattar | Mark Dickson | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1981 | 1501 | 116.6 | — | — | — | — | — | +36 | — | 30.0% | -1.00 | 1–1 | 0–1 | — | -0.12 |
| 22 | 1986 | 1567 | 121.0 | — | — | — | — | -54 | +30 | — | 50.0% | 0.00 | 2–4 (33%) | 4–5 (44%) | — | -0.15 | 1982 | 1689 | 143.1 | — | — | — | — | +21 | -140 | — | 50.8% | +0.20 | 4–7 (36%) | 7–5 (58%) | — | +0.03 |
| 23 | 1987 | 1697 | 124.2 | — | — | — | — | -13 | -71 | — | 52.8% | -0.01 | 12–5 (71%) | 9–8 (53%) | — | +3.23 | 1983 | 1699 | 149.0 | — | — | — | — | +76 | -61 | -176 | 51.8% | +0.23 | 6–9 (40%) | 12–13 (48%) | — | -1.74 |
| 24 | 1988 | 1679 | 135.5 | — | — | — | — | -65 | +52 | — | 52.9% | +0.34 | 4–2 (67%) | 4–4 (50%) | — | -0.58 | 1984 | 1812 | 143.4 | — | — | — | — | +12 | -64 | — | 58.3% | +0.53 | 16–13 (55%) | 10–10 (50%) | — | +2.51 |
| 25 | 1989 | 1682 | 126.0 | — | — | — | — | +17 | -25 | — | 57.4% | +0.47 | 6–7 (46%) | 6–12 (33%) | — | +3.17 | 1985 | 1718 | 135.5 | — | — | — | — | -39 | -4 | -56 | 51.4% | +0.06 | 5–6 (45%) | 8–10 (44%) | — | -0.14 |
| 26 | 1990 | 1697 | 127.6 | — | — | — | — | +63 | -53 | — | 54.5% | +0.21 | 10–6 (63%) | 6–6 (50%) | — | +2.59 | 1986 | 1614 | 109.2 | — | — | — | — | -4 | +68 | — | 48.9% | -0.47 | 2–7 (22%) | 5–1 (83%) | — | +2.89 |
| 27 | 1991 | 1633 | 123.3 | -1.11 | -1.85 | 0.913 | 48.4% | +52 | -31 | -104 | 43.6% | -0.59 | 3–7 (30%) | 6–7 (46%) | — | +0.26 | 1987 | 1619 | 119.2 | — | — | — | — | +3 | +34 | — | 49.0% | -0.06 | 5–6 (45%) | 2–4 (33%) | — | +0.68 |
| 28 | 1992 | 1714 | 131.8 | +1.84 | -1.25 | 1.026 | 50.5% | -3 | -41 | — | 51.5% | -0.02 | 10–6 (63%) | 9–7 (56%) | — | -0.94 | 1988 | 1625 | 120.2 | — | — | — | — | -46 | +29 | +71 | 52.4% | +0.10 | 1–3 (25%) | 3–2 (60%) | — | -0.23 |
| 29 | 1993 | 1691 | 135.1 | -0.37 | -1.77 | 0.899 | 48.5% | +48 | -70 | — | 47.1% | -0.39 | 7–8 (47%) | 10–6 (63%) | — | -0.03 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 1994 | 1698 | 127.3 | -0.05 | -2.01 | 0.916 | 48.3% | +15 | -47 | — | 49.4% | -0.17 | 8–1 (89%) | 6–3 (67%) | — | -0.26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 1995 | 1594 | 111.7 | -2.46 | -4.96 | 0.713 | 45.6% | +20 | — | — | 22.7% | -1.64 | 0–1 | 2–2 (50%) | — | +0.33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 1766 | 133.5 | -0.11 | -1.94 | 0.921 | 48.7% | +20 | -30 | -104 | 50.4% | -0.07 | 62–47 (57%) | 62–60 (51%) | 104.7 | +2.25 | — | 1819 | 142.5 | — | — | — | — | +11 | -32 | -54 | 52.5% | +0.17 | 40–52 (43%) | 47–46 (51%) | 97.9 | +1.58 |
Career Rivalries
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
Mark Dickson
all rivalries →| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kevin Curren | 2 | 3 | 5 | Sep 20, 1984 | H2H |
| Bill Scanlon | 4 | 1 | 5 | Apr 7, 1984 | H2H |
| Tim Mayotte | 2 | 2 | 4 | Aug 4, 1988 | H2H |
| Jimmy Brown | 4 | 0 | 4 | Jul 7, 1988 | — |
| Todd Nelson | 2 | 2 | 4 | Nov 4, 1987 | H2H |