H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Luiz Mattar vs Peter Doohan H2H: 1-0
Luiz Mattar holds a 1–0 lead over Peter Doohan in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Luiz Mattar leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Luiz Mattar won the 1989 Rio de Janeiro fourth round 6-3 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
BRA
Age 62
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
AUS
Right-Handed
190 cm / 6'3"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 14, 1989* | Rio de Janeiro | ATP 250 | R16 | Carpet | Luiz Mattar | 6-3 6-1 | Peter Doohan | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Luiz Mattar | #888 | #29 | 796 | 1,772 | 176 | 161 | 52.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 7 |
| Peter Doohan | #1,102 | #43 | 140 | 1,737 | 50 | 82 | 37.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Luiz Mattar | Peter Doohan | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1979 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #480 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1980 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,493 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1981 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #549 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1982 | 3–3 | 50.0% | — | 1,505 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1986 | 6–7 | 46.2% | #95 | 1,566 | 0 | 0 | 1983 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #363 | 1,500 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1987 | 24–17 | 58.5% | #38 | 1,696 | 0 | 1 | 1984 | 10–9 | 52.6% | #85 | 1,614 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 1988 | 19–16 | 54.3% | #44 | 1,691 | 0 | 2 | 1985 | 18–19 | 48.6% | #101 | 1,683 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 1989 | 23–15 | 60.5% | #62 | 1,684 | 0 | 4 | 1986 | 0–7 | 0.0% | #301 | 1,555 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 1990 | 25–18 | 58.1% | #43 | 1,696 | 0 | 5 | 1987 | 12–15 | 44.4% | #72 | 1,618 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 1991 | 17–24 | 41.5% | #113 | 1,635 | 0 | 5 | 1988 | 4–13 | 23.5% | #187 | 1,485 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 1992 | 21–16 | 56.8% | #51 | 1,718 | 0 | 6 | 1989 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #172 | 1,451 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 1993 | 19–22 | 46.3% | #70 | 1,691 | 0 | 6 | 1990 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #331 | 1,435 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | 1994 | 20–18 | 52.6% | #73 | 1,696 | 0 | 7 | 1991 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1131 | 1,427 | 0 | 1 |
| 31 | 1995 | 2–8 | 20.0% | #404 | 1,593 | 0 | 7 | 1992 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1097 | 1,421 | 0 | 1 |