Luiz Mattar
all rivalries →| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thomas Muster | 1 | 5 | 6 | Oct 15, 1994 | H2H |
| Horacio de la Pena | 3 | 3 | 6 | May 19, 1994 | H2H |
| Alberto Mancini | 3 | 3 | 6 | Oct 28, 1993 | H2H |
| Cassio Motta | 4 | 2 | 6 | Nov 9, 1990 | H2H |
| Mark Woodforde | 2 | 3 | 5 | May 14, 1994 | H2H |
H2H data updated: 2026-09-03 00:00 UTC
Luiz Mattar vs Tarik Benhabiles H2H: 1-1
Luiz Mattar and Tarik Benhabiles are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on clay. Most recently, Tarik Benhabiles won the 1989 Barcelona Open round of 64 6-2 7-6.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
H2H Match Log
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tarik Benhabiles | 6-2 7-6 | Luiz Mattar | Match data | Sep 20, 1989* | R64 | Barcelona Open | ATP 250 | Clay |
| Luiz Mattar | 7-5 6-0 | Tarik Benhabiles | Match data | Sep 23, 1987* | R64 | Barcelona Open | ATP 250 | Clay |
Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Luiz Mattar | #888 | #29 | 796 | 1,766 | 176 | 163 | 51.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 7 |
| Tarik Benhabiles | #1,262 | #22 | 387 | 1,768 | 69 | 105 | 39.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Luiz Mattar | Tarik Benhabiles | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1982 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,483 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1983 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #616 | 1,465 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1984 | 10–9 | 52.6% | #71 | 1,598 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1985 | 16–26 | 38.1% | #134 | 1,503 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1986 | 7–7 | 50.0% | #46 | 1,609 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1986 | 6–7 | 46.2% | #95 | 1,567 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 12–17 | 41.4% | #65 | 1,610 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1987 | 24–17 | 58.5% | #38 | 1,696 | 0 | 1 | 1988 | 4–10 | 28.6% | #230 | 1,578 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1988 | 19–17 | 52.8% | #44 | 1,678 | 0 | 2 | 1989 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #113 | 1,599 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1989 | 23–15 | 60.5% | #62 | 1,681 | 0 | 4 | 1990 | 12–17 | 41.4% | #107 | 1,578 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1990 | 25–18 | 58.1% | #43 | 1,696 | 0 | 5 | 1991 | 5–11 | 31.2% | #177 | 1,545 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 1991 | 17–24 | 41.5% | #113 | 1,632 | 0 | 5 | 1992 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #378 | 1,533 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 1992 | 21–17 | 55.3% | #51 | 1,713 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 1993 | 19–22 | 46.3% | #70 | 1,691 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 1994 | 20–18 | 52.6% | #73 | 1,697 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 1995 | 2–8 | 20.0% | #404 | 1,594 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Surface Results by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.
| Age | Luiz Mattar | Tarik Benhabiles | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | |||
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1982 | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1983 | — | — | — | — | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1984 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 8 | 5 | 13 | 61.5% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1985 | 8 | 9 | 17 | 47.1% | 7 | 9 | 16 | 43.8% | 1 | 6 | 7 | 14.3% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1986 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 6 | 5 | 11 | 54.5% | — | — | — | — | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% |
| 22 | 1986 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 5 | 5 | 10 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1987 | 7 | 6 | 13 | 53.8% | 5 | 9 | 14 | 35.7% | — | — | — | — | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% |
| 23 | 1987 | 16 | 5 | 21 | 76.2% | 8 | 10 | 18 | 44.4% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 1988 | 2 | 4 | 6 | 33.3% | 2 | 4 | 6 | 33.3% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 24 | 1988 | 8 | 8 | 16 | 50.0% | 11 | 8 | 19 | 57.9% | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 1989 | — | — | — | — | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% |
| 25 | 1989 | 7 | 5 | 12 | 58.3% | 9 | 9 | 18 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | 7 | 1 | 8 | 87.5% | 1990 | 0 | 5 | 5 | 0.0% | 12 | 10 | 22 | 54.5% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 26 | 1990 | 8 | 5 | 13 | 61.5% | 7 | 10 | 17 | 41.2% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 10 | 2 | 12 | 83.3% | 1991 | 2 | 4 | 6 | 33.3% | 3 | 7 | 10 | 30.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 1991 | 12 | 13 | 25 | 48.0% | 3 | 7 | 10 | 30.0% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 1992 | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 1992 | 7 | 5 | 12 | 58.3% | 14 | 11 | 25 | 56.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 1993 | 15 | 13 | 28 | 53.6% | 4 | 8 | 12 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 1994 | 9 | 8 | 17 | 52.9% | 10 | 8 | 18 | 55.6% | — | — | — | — | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 1995 | 0 | 5 | 5 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 83 | 69 | 152 | 54.6% | 71 | 76 | 147 | 48.3% | 1 | 6 | 7 | 14.3% | 21 | 12 | 33 | 63.6% | — | 19 | 30 | 49 | 38.8% | 45 | 54 | 99 | 45.5% | 3 | 12 | 15 | 20.0% | 2 | 9 | 11 | 18.2% |
Performance Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 143/168 of Luiz Mattar's and 15/17 of Tarik Benhabiles's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.
| Age | Luiz Mattar | Tarik Benhabiles | ||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | |
| 26 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1991 | 14/16 | 4.3 | 3.0 | 53.0% | 67.2% | 41.9% | 47.1% | 29.3% | 55.6% | 34.7% |
| 27 | 1991 | 36/41 | 5.0 | 2.1 | 58.4% | 66.6% | 49.4% | 53.2% | 43.5% | 59.5% | 37.0% | 1992 | 1/1 | 2.0 | 3.0 | 43.1% | 67.9% | 56.8% | 77.8% | — | 61.5% | 23.0% |
| 28 | 1992 | 34/38 | 6.4 | 2.0 | 56.2% | 71.6% | 53.0% | 64.9% | 45.9% | 63.5% | 37.5% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 1993 | 35/41 | 5.8 | 2.5 | 55.1% | 69.5% | 50.3% | 59.1% | 40.1% | 60.7% | 35.3% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 1994 | 28/38 | 4.5 | 1.8 | 59.1% | 67.2% | 50.6% | 55.4% | 35.7% | 60.5% | 36.2% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 1995 | 10/10 | 2.9 | 1.3 | 61.4% | 61.9% | 57.0% | 69.4% | 53.6% | 60.1% | 28.4% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 143/339 | 5.3 | 2.1 | 57.4% | 68.3% | 51.2% | 59.0% | 42.4% | 61.0% | 36.0% | — | 15/174 | 4.1 | 3.0 | 52.4% | 67.3% | 42.9% | 49.1% | 27.3% | 56.0% | 33.9% |
Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Age | Luiz Mattar | Tarik Benhabiles | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1982 | 1483 | 99.9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 25.0% | -2.75 | — | — | — | +0.05 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1983 | 1466 | 102.1 | — | — | — | — | — | +39 | — | 28.6% | -1.79 | — | 0–2 | — | +0.38 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1984 | 1599 | 120.1 | — | — | — | — | — | +36 | -59 | 48.2% | -0.21 | 7–3 (70%) | 1–0 | — | +1.21 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1985 | 1503 | 123.6 | — | — | — | — | +59 | +123 | -53 | 40.2% | -0.57 | 7–5 (58%) | 8–7 (53%) | — | +1.85 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1986 | 1610 | 131.4 | — | — | — | — | -50 | +83 | — | 51.4% | -0.35 | 3–4 (43%) | 5–0 (100%) | — | -1.17 |
| 22 | 1986 | 1567 | 121.0 | — | — | — | — | -54 | +30 | — | 50.0% | 0.00 | 2–4 (33%) | 4–5 (44%) | — | -0.15 | 1987 | 1610 | 139.1 | — | — | — | — | +7 | +63 | — | 47.5% | -0.17 | 1–5 (17%) | 5–6 (45%) | — | -0.03 |
| 23 | 1987 | 1697 | 124.2 | — | — | — | — | -13 | -71 | — | 52.8% | -0.01 | 12–5 (71%) | 9–8 (53%) | — | +3.23 | 1988 | 1578 | 115.6 | — | — | — | — | +11 | +65 | — | 21.2% | -1.76 | 1–0 | 2–2 (50%) | — | -1.14 |
| 24 | 1988 | 1679 | 135.5 | — | — | — | — | -65 | +52 | — | 52.9% | +0.34 | 4–2 (67%) | 4–4 (50%) | — | -0.58 | 1989 | 1600 | 111.1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 44.4% | -0.78 | 1–0 | 1–0 | — | -0.25 |
| 25 | 1989 | 1682 | 126.0 | — | — | — | — | +17 | -25 | — | 57.4% | +0.47 | 6–7 (46%) | 6–12 (33%) | — | +3.17 | 1990 | 1579 | 129.6 | — | — | — | — | -51 | +135 | — | 44.3% | -0.47 | 5–6 (45%) | 4–4 (50%) | — | +0.08 |
| 26 | 1990 | 1697 | 127.6 | — | — | — | — | +63 | -53 | — | 54.5% | +0.21 | 10–6 (63%) | 6–6 (50%) | — | +2.59 | 1991 | 1545 | 113.9 | -3.13 | -3.16 | 0.782 | 45.4% | -17 | +93 | — | 32.6% | -1.14 | 4–3 (57%) | 0–2 | — | +0.34 |
| 27 | 1991 | 1633 | 123.3 | -1.11 | -1.85 | 0.913 | 48.4% | +52 | -31 | -104 | 43.6% | -0.59 | 3–7 (30%) | 6–7 (46%) | — | +0.26 | 1992 | 1534 | 95.9 | -3.22 | -0.34 | 0.597 | 42.9% | — | — | — | 0.0% | -2.50 | — | — | — | -0.01 |
| 28 | 1992 | 1714 | 131.8 | +1.84 | -1.25 | 1.026 | 50.5% | -3 | -41 | — | 51.5% | -0.02 | 10–6 (63%) | 9–7 (56%) | — | -0.94 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 1993 | 1691 | 135.1 | -0.37 | -1.77 | 0.899 | 48.5% | +48 | -70 | — | 47.1% | -0.39 | 7–8 (47%) | 10–6 (63%) | — | -0.03 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 1994 | 1698 | 127.3 | -0.05 | -2.01 | 0.916 | 48.3% | +15 | -47 | — | 49.4% | -0.17 | 8–1 (89%) | 6–3 (67%) | — | -0.26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 1995 | 1594 | 111.7 | -2.46 | -4.96 | 0.713 | 45.6% | +20 | — | — | 22.7% | -1.64 | 0–1 | 2–2 (50%) | — | +0.33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 1766 | 133.5 | -0.11 | -1.94 | 0.921 | 48.7% | +20 | -30 | -104 | 50.4% | -0.07 | 62–47 (57%) | 62–60 (51%) | 104.7 | +2.25 | — | 1768 | 131.5 | -3.14 | -2.97 | 0.771 | 45.2% | +13 | +91 | -56 | 41.3% | -0.63 | 29–26 (53%) | 26–23 (53%) | 105.8 | +0.75 |
Career Rivalries
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
Tarik Benhabiles
all rivalries →| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ronald Agenor | 1 | 3 | 4 | Sep 14, 1990 | H2H |
| Jimmy Brown | 1 | 3 | 4 | Jun 21, 1990 | — |
| Jonas Svensson | 2 | 1 | 3 | Oct 18, 1990 | H2H |
| Claudio Pistolesi | 2 | 1 | 3 | Aug 10, 1990 | H2H |
| Thierry Tulasne | 1 | 2 | 3 | Aug 2, 1990 | H2H |