H2H data updated: 2026-09-02 00:00 UTC

Luiz Mattar vs Thomas Hogstedt H2H: 1-0

Luiz Mattar holds a 1–0 lead over Thomas Hogstedt in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Luiz Mattar leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Luiz Mattar won the 1989 Rio de Janeiro quarterfinal 6-4 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Luiz Mattar
BRA Age 63 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main draw meetings
Thomas Hogstedt
SWE Age 62 Right-Handed 190 cm / 6'3"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Luiz Mattar #49 6-4 6-4 Thomas Hogstedt #148 Match data Apr 15, 1989* QF Rio de Janeiro ATP 250 Carpet

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Luiz Mattar #888 #29 796 1,766 176 163 51.9% 0 0 0 0 7 7
Thomas Hogstedt #1,032 #38 413 1,736 90 153 37.0% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Luiz Mattar Thomas Hogstedt
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 — — — — — — — 1979 1–1 50.0% #368 1,521 0 0
17 — — — — — — — 1981 1–1 50.0% — 1,538 0 0
18 — — — — — — — 1982 9–10 47.4% #82 1,589 0 0
19 — — — — — — — 1983 15–16 48.4% #63 1,690 0 1
20 — — — — — — — 1984 10–16 38.5% #84 1,639 0 1
21 — — — — — — — 1985 3–10 23.1% #210 1,520 0 1
22 1986 6–7 46.2% #95 1,567 0 0 1986 2–8 20.0% #124 1,504 0 1
23 1987 24–17 58.5% #38 1,696 0 1 1987 8–15 34.8% #179 1,495 0 1
24 1988 19–17 52.8% #44 1,678 0 2 1988 3–4 42.9% #159 1,511 0 1
25 1989 23–15 60.5% #62 1,681 0 4 1989 8–10 44.4% #133 1,607 0 1
26 1990 25–18 58.1% #43 1,696 0 5 1990 12–26 31.6% #91 1,507 0 1
27 1991 17–24 41.5% #113 1,632 0 5 1991 11–23 32.4% #130 1,537 0 1
28 1992 21–17 55.3% #51 1,713 0 6 1992 5–8 38.5% #181 1,559 0 1
29 1993 19–22 46.3% #70 1,691 0 6 1993 0–2 0.0% #306 1,541 0 1
30 1994 20–18 52.6% #73 1,697 0 7 1994 2–3 40.0% #309 1,555 0 1
31 1995 2–8 20.0% #404 1,594 0 7 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Luiz Mattar Thomas Hogstedt
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1979 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1981 — — — — — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1982 5 4 9 55.6% 4 5 9 44.4% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1983 5 8 13 38.5% 3 5 8 37.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 7 2 9 77.8%
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1984 4 7 11 36.4% 0 4 4 0.0% — — — — 6 5 11 54.5%
21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1985 1 5 6 16.7% — — — — — — — — 2 5 7 28.6%
22 1986 1 2 3 33.3% 5 5 10 50.0% — — — — — — — — 1986 1 3 4 25.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0%
23 1987 16 5 21 76.2% 8 10 18 44.4% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1987 6 8 14 42.9% 1 4 5 20.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
24 1988 8 8 16 50.0% 11 8 19 57.9% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1988 3 4 7 42.9% — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 1989 7 5 12 58.3% 9 9 18 50.0% — — — — 7 1 8 87.5% 1989 4 6 10 40.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0%
26 1990 8 5 13 61.5% 7 10 17 41.2% 0 1 1 0.0% 10 2 12 83.3% 1990 5 16 21 23.8% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 7 6 13 53.8%
27 1991 12 13 25 48.0% 3 7 10 30.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1991 6 12 18 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 5 8 13 38.5%
28 1992 7 5 12 58.3% 14 11 25 56.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1992 5 6 11 45.5% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
29 1993 15 13 28 53.6% 4 8 12 33.3% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1993 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
30 1994 9 8 17 52.9% 10 8 18 55.6% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% 1994 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — 1 1 2 50.0%
31 1995 0 5 5 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 83 69 152 54.6% 71 76 147 48.3% 1 6 7 14.3% 21 12 33 63.6% — 47 83 130 36.2% 9 24 33 27.3% 2 9 11 18.2% 32 37 69 46.4%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 143/168 of Luiz Mattar's and 45/54 of Thomas Hogstedt's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Luiz Mattar Thomas Hogstedt
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
27 1991 36/41 5.0 2.1 58.4% 66.6% 49.4% 53.2% 43.5% 59.5% 37.0% 1991 28/34 4.1 3.5 51.7% 67.9% 46.3% 50.1% 44.9% 57.3% 35.0%
28 1992 34/38 6.4 2.0 56.2% 71.6% 53.0% 64.9% 45.9% 63.5% 37.5% 1992 10/13 4.8 4.6 51.4% 65.6% 47.6% 52.6% 56.3% 56.8% 35.3%
29 1993 35/41 5.8 2.5 55.1% 69.5% 50.3% 59.1% 40.1% 60.7% 35.3% 1993 2/2 6.5 6.0 44.7% 63.3% 30.7% 35.6% 53.6% 45.4% 34.6%
30 1994 28/38 4.5 1.8 59.1% 67.2% 50.6% 55.4% 35.7% 60.5% 36.2% 1994 5/5 3.8 2.2 53.9% 66.9% 53.5% 34.1% 45.5% 60.5% 33.3%
31 1995 10/10 2.9 1.3 61.4% 61.9% 57.0% 69.4% 53.6% 60.1% 28.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 143/339 5.3 2.1 57.4% 68.3% 51.2% 59.0% 42.4% 61.0% 36.0% — 45/243 4.3 3.7 51.6% 67.1% 46.7% 48.3% 47.9% 57.0% 34.9%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Luiz Mattar Thomas Hogstedt
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1979 1521 109.9 — — — — — — — 50.0% -1.50 — 2–0 — -0.23
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1981 1539 106.9 — — — — — — — 50.0% +0.17 — 0–1 — +0.17
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1982 1590 118.6 — — — — +14 -47 — 48.9% -0.06 5–4 (56%) 2–3 (40%) — +1.74
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1983 1691 138.1 — — — — +29 -141 — 51.2% -0.11 3–8 (27%) 7–6 (54%) — +0.67
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1984 1639 130.8 — — — — +45 -131 — 42.2% -0.53 4–6 (40%) 7–5 (58%) — +0.47
21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1985 1521 106.8 — — — — +9 — — 28.1% -0.88 2–3 (40%) 0–6 (0%) — +1.64
22 1986 1567 121.0 — — — — -54 +30 — 50.0% 0.00 2–4 (33%) 4–5 (44%) — -0.15 1986 1504 117.7 — — — — +11 -6 — 21.7% -1.87 2–1 (67%) 1–2 (33%) — -0.27
23 1987 1697 124.2 — — — — -13 -71 — 52.8% -0.01 12–5 (71%) 9–8 (53%) — +3.23 1987 1495 116.9 — — — — +33 -27 — 35.7% -1.22 4–3 (57%) 6–7 (46%) — -0.07
24 1988 1679 135.5 — — — — -65 +52 — 52.9% +0.34 4–2 (67%) 4–4 (50%) — -0.58 1988 1512 109.5 — — — — +25 — — 44.4% -0.61 1–1 0–1 — +0.37
25 1989 1682 126.0 — — — — +17 -25 — 57.4% +0.47 6–7 (46%) 6–12 (33%) — +3.17 1989 1608 120.3 — — — — -7 — — 43.2% -0.91 2–1 (67%) 3–1 (75%) — -0.52
26 1990 1697 127.6 — — — — +63 -53 — 54.5% +0.21 10–6 (63%) 6–6 (50%) — +2.59 1990 1508 117.7 — — — — +38 — +6 37.2% -0.67 6–10 (38%) 7–13 (35%) — +1.36
27 1991 1633 123.3 -1.11 -1.85 0.913 48.4% +52 -31 -104 43.6% -0.59 3–7 (30%) 6–7 (46%) — +0.26 1991 1538 127.2 -2.85 -2.49 0.820 46.5% +39 — — 38.4% -0.93 4–5 (44%) 4–7 (36%) — -0.11
28 1992 1714 131.8 +1.84 -1.25 1.026 50.5% -3 -41 — 51.5% -0.02 10–6 (63%) 9–7 (56%) — -0.94 1992 1559 120.6 -2.70 -1.47 0.819 46.4% +35 — — 39.4% -1.09 3–2 (60%) 3–1 (75%) — +0.16
29 1993 1691 135.1 -0.37 -1.77 0.899 48.5% +48 -70 — 47.1% -0.39 7–8 (47%) 10–6 (63%) — -0.03 1993 1541 99.0 -2.06 +0.48 0.633 40.4% — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — -0.15
30 1994 1698 127.3 -0.05 -2.01 0.916 48.3% +15 -47 — 49.4% -0.17 8–1 (89%) 6–3 (67%) — -0.26 1994 1556 115.0 -1.47 +0.36 0.841 47.2% +11 — — 36.4% -1.09 1–0 0–1 — -0.01
31 1995 1594 111.7 -2.46 -4.96 0.713 45.6% +20 — — 22.7% -1.64 0–1 2–2 (50%) — +0.33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1766 133.5 -0.11 -1.94 0.921 48.7% +20 -30 -104 50.4% -0.07 62–47 (57%) 62–60 (51%) 104.7 +2.25 — 1737 130.3 -2.63 -1.81 0.811 46.3% +28 -74 +6 40.4% -0.73 37–44 (46%) 42–54 (44%) 100.1 +2.17

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.