Luiz Mattar
all rivalries →| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thomas Muster | 1 | 5 | 6 | Oct 15, 1994 | H2H |
| Horacio de la Pena | 3 | 3 | 6 | May 19, 1994 | H2H |
| Alberto Mancini | 3 | 3 | 6 | Oct 28, 1993 | H2H |
| Cassio Motta | 4 | 2 | 6 | Nov 9, 1990 | H2H |
| Mark Woodforde | 2 | 3 | 5 | May 14, 1994 | H2H |
H2H data updated: 2026-09-01 00:00 UTC
Luiz Mattar and Tomas Smid are tied 2–2 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Tomas Smid leads 2–0 on clay, while Luiz Mattar leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Luiz Mattar won the 1988 Swiss Indoors round of 32 4-6 6-3 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Luiz Mattar | 4-6 6-3 6-4 | Tomas Smid | Match data | Oct 7, 1988* | R32 | Swiss Indoors | ATP 250 | Hard |
| Luiz Mattar | 4-6 7-6 6-4 | Tomas Smid | Match data | Nov 28, 1987* | SF | Itaparica | ATP 250 | Hard |
| Tomas Smid | 6-2 6-2 | Luiz Mattar | Match data | Apr 22, 1987* | R64 | Monte-Carlo Masters | ATP 250 | Clay |
| Tomas Smid | 6-1 7-6 | Luiz Mattar | Match data | Sep 24, 1986* | R64 | Barcelona Open | ATP 250 | Clay |
Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Luiz Mattar | #888 | #29 | 796 | 1,766 | 176 | 163 | 51.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 7 |
| Tomas Smid | #975 | #11 | 28 | 1,994 | 490 | 317 | 60.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 9 | 9 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Luiz Mattar | Tomas Smid | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1976 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #154 | 1,542 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1977 | 16–18 | 47.1% | #62 | 1,639 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1986 | 6–7 | 46.2% | #95 | 1,567 | 0 | 0 | 1978 | 36–25 | 59.0% | #36 | 1,799 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 1987 | 24–17 | 58.5% | #38 | 1,696 | 0 | 1 | 1979 | 50–25 | 66.7% | #27 | 1,871 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 1988 | 19–17 | 52.8% | #44 | 1,678 | 0 | 2 | 1980 | 43–20 | 68.3% | #23 | 1,923 | 0 | 4 |
| 25 | 1989 | 23–15 | 60.5% | #62 | 1,681 | 0 | 4 | 1981 | 49–28 | 63.6% | #28 | 1,854 | 0 | 4 |
| 26 | 1990 | 25–18 | 58.1% | #43 | 1,696 | 0 | 5 | 1982 | 62–28 | 68.9% | #24 | 1,893 | 0 | 6 |
| 27 | 1991 | 17–24 | 41.5% | #113 | 1,632 | 0 | 5 | 1983 | 59–30 | 66.3% | #17 | 1,903 | 0 | 8 |
| 28 | 1992 | 21–17 | 55.3% | #51 | 1,713 | 0 | 6 | 1984 | 46–27 | 63.0% | #16 | 1,840 | 0 | 8 |
| 29 | 1993 | 19–22 | 46.3% | #70 | 1,691 | 0 | 6 | 1985 | 47–27 | 63.5% | #19 | 1,804 | 0 | 9 |
| 30 | 1994 | 20–18 | 52.6% | #73 | 1,697 | 0 | 7 | 1986 | 28–24 | 53.8% | #54 | 1,723 | 0 | 9 |
| 31 | 1995 | 2–8 | 20.0% | #404 | 1,594 | 0 | 7 | 1987 | 30–26 | 53.6% | #31 | 1,730 | 0 | 9 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1988 | 17–23 | 42.5% | #115 | 1,657 | 0 | 9 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1989 | 2–9 | 18.2% | #453 | 1,536 | 0 | 9 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.
| Age | Luiz Mattar | Tomas Smid | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | |||
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1976 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 4 | 3 | 7 | 57.1% | — | — | — | — | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1977 | 4 | 5 | 9 | 44.4% | 10 | 8 | 18 | 55.6% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% |
| 22 | 1986 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 5 | 5 | 10 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1978 | 4 | 5 | 9 | 44.4% | 22 | 12 | 34 | 64.7% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 10 | 7 | 17 | 58.8% |
| 23 | 1987 | 16 | 5 | 21 | 76.2% | 8 | 10 | 18 | 44.4% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 1979 | 6 | 4 | 10 | 60.0% | 33 | 12 | 45 | 73.3% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 10 | 8 | 18 | 55.6% |
| 24 | 1988 | 8 | 8 | 16 | 50.0% | 11 | 8 | 19 | 57.9% | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 1980 | 15 | 6 | 21 | 71.4% | 16 | 7 | 23 | 69.6% | — | — | — | — | 12 | 7 | 19 | 63.2% |
| 25 | 1989 | 7 | 5 | 12 | 58.3% | 9 | 9 | 18 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | 7 | 1 | 8 | 87.5% | 1981 | 15 | 7 | 22 | 68.2% | 23 | 11 | 34 | 67.6% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 11 | 9 | 20 | 55.0% |
| 26 | 1990 | 8 | 5 | 13 | 61.5% | 7 | 10 | 17 | 41.2% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 10 | 2 | 12 | 83.3% | 1982 | 10 | 4 | 14 | 71.4% | 24 | 11 | 35 | 68.6% | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% | 26 | 12 | 38 | 68.4% |
| 27 | 1991 | 12 | 13 | 25 | 48.0% | 3 | 7 | 10 | 30.0% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 1983 | 10 | 6 | 16 | 62.5% | 36 | 12 | 48 | 75.0% | 5 | 3 | 8 | 62.5% | 8 | 9 | 17 | 47.1% |
| 28 | 1992 | 7 | 5 | 12 | 58.3% | 14 | 11 | 25 | 56.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 1984 | 10 | 4 | 14 | 71.4% | 15 | 11 | 26 | 57.7% | 4 | 1 | 5 | 80.0% | 17 | 11 | 28 | 60.7% |
| 29 | 1993 | 15 | 13 | 28 | 53.6% | 4 | 8 | 12 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 1985 | 18 | 9 | 27 | 66.7% | 18 | 7 | 25 | 72.0% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 10 | 9 | 19 | 52.6% |
| 30 | 1994 | 9 | 8 | 17 | 52.9% | 10 | 8 | 18 | 55.6% | — | — | — | — | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 1986 | 7 | 5 | 12 | 58.3% | 15 | 11 | 26 | 57.7% | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% | 4 | 7 | 11 | 36.4% |
| 31 | 1995 | 0 | 5 | 5 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | 1987 | 6 | 8 | 14 | 42.9% | 18 | 11 | 29 | 62.1% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 5 | 6 | 11 | 45.5% |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1988 | 6 | 6 | 12 | 50.0% | 11 | 11 | 22 | 50.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 0 | 5 | 5 | 0.0% |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1989 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 2 | 8 | 10 | 20.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 83 | 69 | 152 | 54.6% | 71 | 76 | 147 | 48.3% | 1 | 6 | 7 | 14.3% | 21 | 12 | 33 | 63.6% | — | 111 | 71 | 182 | 61.0% | 247 | 135 | 382 | 64.7% | 17 | 15 | 32 | 53.1% | 115 | 96 | 211 | 54.5% |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Age | Luiz Mattar | Tomas Smid | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1976 | 1542 | 125.7 | — | — | — | — | -33 | +68 | — | 51.6% | +0.16 | 0–5 (0%) | 2–4 (33%) | — | +0.89 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1977 | 1639 | 136.8 | — | — | — | — | -104 | +44 | -135 | 51.3% | +0.20 | 1–7 (13%) | 2–6 (25%) | — | +1.24 |
| 22 | 1986 | 1567 | 121.0 | — | — | — | — | -54 | +30 | — | 50.0% | 0.00 | 2–4 (33%) | 4–5 (44%) | — | -0.15 | 1978 | 1799 | 150.6 | — | — | — | — | -122 | +63 | — | 54.8% | +0.44 | 11–8 (58%) | 8–7 (53%) | — | +0.34 |
| 23 | 1987 | 1697 | 124.2 | — | — | — | — | -13 | -71 | — | 52.8% | -0.01 | 12–5 (71%) | 9–8 (53%) | — | +3.23 | 1979 | 1871 | 159.1 | — | — | — | — | -70 | +110 | — | 63.8% | +0.89 | 7–7 (50%) | 12–6 (67%) | — | -1.69 |
| 24 | 1988 | 1679 | 135.5 | — | — | — | — | -65 | +52 | — | 52.9% | +0.34 | 4–2 (67%) | 4–4 (50%) | — | -0.58 | 1980 | 1923 | 155.5 | — | — | — | — | +11 | +3 | — | 65.7% | +0.98 | 7–5 (58%) | 6–2 (75%) | — | -2.22 |
| 25 | 1989 | 1682 | 126.0 | — | — | — | — | +17 | -25 | — | 57.4% | +0.47 | 6–7 (46%) | 6–12 (33%) | — | +3.17 | 1981 | 1854 | 157.2 | — | — | — | — | +46 | +62 | — | 60.1% | +0.90 | 11–6 (65%) | 15–9 (63%) | — | -1.40 |
| 26 | 1990 | 1697 | 127.6 | — | — | — | — | +63 | -53 | — | 54.5% | +0.21 | 10–6 (63%) | 6–6 (50%) | — | +2.59 | 1982 | 1894 | 156.3 | — | — | — | — | +23 | +3 | -326 | 63.8% | +1.01 | 16–10 (62%) | 14–11 (56%) | — | -0.62 |
| 27 | 1991 | 1633 | 123.3 | -1.11 | -1.85 | 0.913 | 48.4% | +52 | -31 | -104 | 43.6% | -0.59 | 3–7 (30%) | 6–7 (46%) | — | +0.26 | 1983 | 1903 | 155.6 | — | — | — | — | -53 | +56 | -203 | 61.5% | +0.89 | 12–9 (57%) | 6–10 (38%) | — | -2.90 |
| 28 | 1992 | 1714 | 131.8 | +1.84 | -1.25 | 1.026 | 50.5% | -3 | -41 | — | 51.5% | -0.02 | 10–6 (63%) | 9–7 (56%) | — | -0.94 | 1984 | 1841 | 154.8 | — | — | — | — | +61 | -25 | -66 | 59.9% | +0.58 | 10–7 (59%) | 10–11 (48%) | — | -1.32 |
| 29 | 1993 | 1691 | 135.1 | -0.37 | -1.77 | 0.899 | 48.5% | +48 | -70 | — | 47.1% | -0.39 | 7–8 (47%) | 10–6 (63%) | — | -0.03 | 1985 | 1805 | 149.1 | — | — | — | — | +56 | +68 | -70 | 59.1% | +0.51 | 14–6 (70%) | 13–8 (62%) | — | +1.83 |
| 30 | 1994 | 1698 | 127.3 | -0.05 | -2.01 | 0.916 | 48.3% | +15 | -47 | — | 49.4% | -0.17 | 8–1 (89%) | 6–3 (67%) | — | -0.26 | 1986 | 1724 | 130.9 | — | — | — | — | +7 | +71 | +37 | 52.3% | +0.30 | 10–7 (59%) | 6–15 (29%) | — | +1.95 |
| 31 | 1995 | 1594 | 111.7 | -2.46 | -4.96 | 0.713 | 45.6% | +20 | — | — | 22.7% | -1.64 | 0–1 | 2–2 (50%) | — | +0.33 | 1987 | 1731 | 138.3 | — | — | — | — | -67 | +83 | — | 53.2% | +0.07 | 7–10 (41%) | 16–9 (64%) | — | -0.84 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1988 | 1657 | 139.2 | — | — | — | — | +9 | +87 | — | 41.8% | -0.36 | 7–5 (58%) | 4–7 (36%) | — | -2.59 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1989 | 1537 | 102.8 | — | — | — | — | — | +74 | — | 25.9% | -1.52 | 1–2 (33%) | 0–3 (0%) | — | +0.70 |
| Career | — | 1766 | 133.5 | -0.11 | -1.94 | 0.921 | 48.7% | +20 | -30 | -104 | 50.4% | -0.07 | 62–47 (57%) | 62–60 (51%) | 104.7 | +2.25 | — | 1994 | 155.1 | — | — | — | — | -3 | +56 | -137 | 58.0% | +0.58 | 114–94 (55%) | 114–108 (51%) | 99.2 | -0.82 |
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thomas Muster | 1 | 5 | 6 | Oct 15, 1994 | H2H |
| Horacio de la Pena | 3 | 3 | 6 | May 19, 1994 | H2H |
| Alberto Mancini | 3 | 3 | 6 | Oct 28, 1993 | H2H |
| Cassio Motta | 4 | 2 | 6 | Nov 9, 1990 | H2H |
| Mark Woodforde | 2 | 3 | 5 | May 14, 1994 | H2H |
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yannick Noah | 3 | 8 | 11 | May 14, 1988 | H2H |
| Ivan Lendl | 1 | 10 | 11 | Jan 19, 1986 | H2H |
| John McEnroe | 0 | 10 | 10 | Feb 6, 1987 | H2H |
| Guillermo Vilas | 1 | 9 | 10 | Aug 31, 1985 | H2H |
| Balazs Taroczy | 5 | 4 | 9 | Aug 8, 1986 | H2H |