Luiz Mattar
all rivalries →| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thomas Muster | 1 | 5 | 6 | Oct 15, 1994 | H2H |
| Horacio de la Pena | 3 | 3 | 6 | May 19, 1994 | H2H |
| Alberto Mancini | 3 | 3 | 6 | Oct 28, 1993 | H2H |
| Cassio Motta | 4 | 2 | 6 | Nov 9, 1990 | H2H |
| Mark Woodforde | 2 | 3 | 5 | May 14, 1994 | H2H |
H2H data updated: 2026-09-02 00:00 UTC
Luiz Mattar and Yannick Noah are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on clay. Most recently, Luiz Mattar won the 1989 Roland Garros round of 128 7-6 6-4 6-7 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Luiz Mattar | 7-6 6-4 6-7 6-4 | Yannick Noah | Match data | May 31, 1989* | R128 | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | Clay |
| Yannick Noah | 6-2 6-4 4-6 7-6 | Luiz Mattar | Match data | May 27, 1988* | R64 | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | Clay |
Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Luiz Mattar | #888 | #29 | 796 | 1,766 | 176 | 163 | 51.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 7 |
| Yannick Noah | #1,303 | #3 | 1,079 | 2,199 | 456 | 194 | 70.2% | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 21 | 23 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Luiz Mattar | Yannick Noah | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1977 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #269 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1978 | 23–14 | 62.2% | #49 | 1,708 | 0 | 2 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1979 | 34–14 | 70.8% | #26 | 1,933 | 0 | 5 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1980 | 29–16 | 64.4% | #18 | 1,890 | 0 | 5 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1981 | 51–18 | 73.9% | #13 | 1,917 | 0 | 7 |
| 22 | 1986 | 6–7 | 46.2% | #95 | 1,567 | 0 | 0 | 1982 | 50–12 | 80.6% | #10 | 2,086 | 0 | 11 |
| 23 | 1987 | 24–17 | 58.5% | #38 | 1,696 | 0 | 1 | 1983 | 36–9 | 80.0% | #5 | 2,087 | 1 | 14 |
| 24 | 1988 | 19–17 | 52.8% | #44 | 1,678 | 0 | 2 | 1984 | 23–10 | 69.7% | #9 | 1,997 | 1 | 14 |
| 25 | 1989 | 23–15 | 60.5% | #62 | 1,681 | 0 | 4 | 1985 | 50–17 | 74.6% | #7 | 1,956 | 1 | 17 |
| 26 | 1990 | 25–18 | 58.1% | #43 | 1,696 | 0 | 5 | 1986 | 43–14 | 75.4% | #4 | 2,012 | 1 | 19 |
| 27 | 1991 | 17–24 | 41.5% | #113 | 1,632 | 0 | 5 | 1987 | 34–13 | 72.3% | #8 | 1,951 | 1 | 21 |
| 28 | 1992 | 21–17 | 55.3% | #51 | 1,713 | 0 | 6 | 1988 | 32–10 | 76.2% | #12 | 1,948 | 1 | 22 |
| 29 | 1993 | 19–22 | 46.3% | #70 | 1,691 | 0 | 6 | 1989 | 21–14 | 60.0% | #16 | 1,876 | 1 | 22 |
| 30 | 1994 | 20–18 | 52.6% | #73 | 1,697 | 0 | 7 | 1990 | 22–21 | 51.2% | #40 | 1,708 | 1 | 23 |
| 31 | 1995 | 2–8 | 20.0% | #404 | 1,594 | 0 | 7 | 1991 | 7–7 | 50.0% | #188 | 1,708 | 1 | 23 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1995 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #552 | 1,686 | 1 | 23 |
| 36 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1996 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1300 | 1,672 | 1 | 23 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.
| Age | Luiz Mattar | Yannick Noah | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | |||
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1977 | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1978 | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | 18 | 7 | 25 | 72.0% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1979 | 13 | 5 | 18 | 72.2% | 16 | 4 | 20 | 80.0% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1980 | 11 | 5 | 16 | 68.8% | 14 | 5 | 19 | 73.7% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 3 | 4 | 7 | 42.9% |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1981 | 10 | 6 | 16 | 62.5% | 22 | 6 | 28 | 78.6% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 18 | 4 | 22 | 81.8% |
| 22 | 1986 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 5 | 5 | 10 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1982 | 19 | 1 | 20 | 95.0% | 29 | 7 | 36 | 80.6% | — | — | — | — | 2 | 4 | 6 | 33.3% |
| 23 | 1987 | 16 | 5 | 21 | 76.2% | 8 | 10 | 18 | 44.4% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 1983 | 9 | 4 | 13 | 69.2% | 23 | 2 | 25 | 92.0% | — | — | — | — | 4 | 3 | 7 | 57.1% |
| 24 | 1988 | 8 | 8 | 16 | 50.0% | 11 | 8 | 19 | 57.9% | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 1984 | 9 | 3 | 12 | 75.0% | 11 | 4 | 15 | 73.3% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% |
| 25 | 1989 | 7 | 5 | 12 | 58.3% | 9 | 9 | 18 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | 7 | 1 | 8 | 87.5% | 1985 | 21 | 7 | 28 | 75.0% | 20 | 4 | 24 | 83.3% | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% | 7 | 5 | 12 | 58.3% |
| 26 | 1990 | 8 | 5 | 13 | 61.5% | 7 | 10 | 17 | 41.2% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 10 | 2 | 12 | 83.3% | 1986 | 15 | 5 | 20 | 75.0% | 17 | 3 | 20 | 85.0% | — | — | — | — | 11 | 6 | 17 | 64.7% |
| 27 | 1991 | 12 | 13 | 25 | 48.0% | 3 | 7 | 10 | 30.0% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 1987 | 13 | 2 | 15 | 86.7% | 9 | 5 | 14 | 64.3% | 4 | 3 | 7 | 57.1% | 8 | 3 | 11 | 72.7% |
| 28 | 1992 | 7 | 5 | 12 | 58.3% | 14 | 11 | 25 | 56.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 1988 | 9 | 3 | 12 | 75.0% | 14 | 5 | 19 | 73.7% | — | — | — | — | 9 | 2 | 11 | 81.8% |
| 29 | 1993 | 15 | 13 | 28 | 53.6% | 4 | 8 | 12 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 1989 | 16 | 8 | 24 | 66.7% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 5 | 4 | 9 | 55.6% |
| 30 | 1994 | 9 | 8 | 17 | 52.9% | 10 | 8 | 18 | 55.6% | — | — | — | — | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 1990 | 16 | 7 | 23 | 69.6% | 3 | 6 | 9 | 33.3% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 3 | 6 | 9 | 33.3% |
| 31 | 1995 | 0 | 5 | 5 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | 1991 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 6 | 4 | 10 | 60.0% | — | — | — | — | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1995 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 36 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1996 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 83 | 69 | 152 | 54.6% | 71 | 76 | 147 | 48.3% | 1 | 6 | 7 | 14.3% | 21 | 12 | 33 | 63.6% | — | 164 | 62 | 226 | 72.6% | 202 | 66 | 268 | 75.4% | 11 | 16 | 27 | 40.7% | 79 | 50 | 129 | 61.2% |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 143/168 of Luiz Mattar's and 18/19 of Yannick Noah's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.
| Age | Luiz Mattar | Yannick Noah | ||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | |
| 27 | 1991 | 36/41 | 5.0 | 2.1 | 58.4% | 66.6% | 49.4% | 53.2% | 43.5% | 59.5% | 37.0% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 1992 | 34/38 | 6.4 | 2.0 | 56.2% | 71.6% | 53.0% | 64.9% | 45.9% | 63.5% | 37.5% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 1993 | 35/41 | 5.8 | 2.5 | 55.1% | 69.5% | 50.3% | 59.1% | 40.1% | 60.7% | 35.3% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 1994 | 28/38 | 4.5 | 1.8 | 59.1% | 67.2% | 50.6% | 55.4% | 35.7% | 60.5% | 36.2% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 1995 | 10/10 | 2.9 | 1.3 | 61.4% | 61.9% | 57.0% | 69.4% | 53.6% | 60.1% | 28.4% | 1991 | 13/14 | 4.5 | 3.5 | 55.5% | 68.0% | 44.8% | 62.6% | 47.2% | 57.6% | 36.6% |
| 35 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1995 | 4/4 | 4.0 | 1.8 | 55.4% | 77.9% | 47.6% | 45.5% | 20.0% | 64.1% | 29.2% |
| 36 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1996 | 1/1 | 7.0 | 2.0 | 60.5% | 69.2% | 50.0% | 50.0% | 100.0% | 61.6% | 19.4% |
| Career | — | 143/339 | 5.3 | 2.1 | 57.4% | 68.3% | 51.2% | 59.0% | 42.4% | 61.0% | 36.0% | — | 18/650 | 4.6 | 3.1 | 55.8% | 70.2% | 45.7% | 58.1% | 44.1% | 59.2% | 34.0% |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Age | Luiz Mattar | Yannick Noah | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1977 | 1491 | 103.3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 40.0% | -2.00 | 0–1 | 2–0 | — | -0.08 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1978 | 1709 | 137.9 | — | — | — | — | -111 | +56 | -173 | 57.7% | +0.42 | 7–5 (58%) | 10–6 (63%) | — | +3.56 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1979 | 1933 | 150.7 | — | — | — | — | -105 | +27 | -371 | 65.1% | +1.08 | 9–4 (69%) | 10–9 (53%) | — | +0.67 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1980 | 1890 | 153.0 | — | — | — | — | +5 | +91 | -340 | 59.5% | +0.98 | 9–6 (60%) | 6–8 (43%) | — | -3.05 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1981 | 1917 | 156.5 | — | — | — | — | +62 | +116 | -384 | 64.4% | +1.04 | 17–4 (81%) | 9–12 (43%) | — | -1.67 |
| 22 | 1986 | 1567 | 121.0 | — | — | — | — | -54 | +30 | — | 50.0% | 0.00 | 2–4 (33%) | 4–5 (44%) | — | -0.15 | 1982 | 2086 | 164.7 | — | — | — | — | -20 | +30 | — | 74.0% | +1.55 | 12–5 (71%) | 9–6 (60%) | — | -3.56 |
| 23 | 1987 | 1697 | 124.2 | — | — | — | — | -13 | -71 | — | 52.8% | -0.01 | 12–5 (71%) | 9–8 (53%) | — | +3.23 | 1983 | 2087 | 162.3 | — | — | — | — | -135 | +184 | — | 74.8% | +1.72 | 7–6 (54%) | 8–4 (67%) | — | -1.85 |
| 24 | 1988 | 1679 | 135.5 | — | — | — | — | -65 | +52 | — | 52.9% | +0.34 | 4–2 (67%) | 4–4 (50%) | — | -0.58 | 1984 | 1998 | 159.6 | — | — | — | — | -11 | +206 | — | 65.9% | +0.83 | 8–5 (62%) | 9–3 (75%) | — | -2.14 |
| 25 | 1989 | 1682 | 126.0 | — | — | — | — | +17 | -25 | — | 57.4% | +0.47 | 6–7 (46%) | 6–12 (33%) | — | +3.17 | 1985 | 1957 | 156.2 | — | — | — | — | -10 | +205 | -368 | 68.4% | +1.11 | 12–6 (67%) | 18–12 (60%) | — | -0.87 |
| 26 | 1990 | 1697 | 127.6 | — | — | — | — | +63 | -53 | — | 54.5% | +0.21 | 10–6 (63%) | 6–6 (50%) | — | +2.59 | 1986 | 2013 | 163.9 | — | — | — | — | -41 | +208 | — | 67.8% | +1.19 | 13–5 (72%) | 12–17 (41%) | — | -2.21 |
| 27 | 1991 | 1633 | 123.3 | -1.11 | -1.85 | 0.913 | 48.4% | +52 | -31 | -104 | 43.6% | -0.59 | 3–7 (30%) | 6–7 (46%) | — | +0.26 | 1987 | 1951 | 147.7 | — | — | — | — | +93 | +140 | -296 | 65.0% | +1.00 | 11–4 (73%) | 8–9 (47%) | — | +1.55 |
| 28 | 1992 | 1714 | 131.8 | +1.84 | -1.25 | 1.026 | 50.5% | -3 | -41 | — | 51.5% | -0.02 | 10–6 (63%) | 9–7 (56%) | — | -0.94 | 1988 | 1949 | 153.8 | — | — | — | — | +75 | +116 | — | 67.2% | +1.03 | 12–4 (75%) | 15–11 (58%) | — | -0.74 |
| 29 | 1993 | 1691 | 135.1 | -0.37 | -1.77 | 0.899 | 48.5% | +48 | -70 | — | 47.1% | -0.39 | 7–8 (47%) | 10–6 (63%) | — | -0.03 | 1989 | 1877 | 147.3 | — | — | — | — | +46 | — | — | 56.2% | +0.40 | 10–4 (71%) | 10–12 (45%) | — | -0.89 |
| 30 | 1994 | 1698 | 127.3 | -0.05 | -2.01 | 0.916 | 48.3% | +15 | -47 | — | 49.4% | -0.17 | 8–1 (89%) | 6–3 (67%) | — | -0.26 | 1990 | 1708 | 139.1 | — | — | — | — | +109 | +162 | — | 49.1% | -0.16 | 8–6 (57%) | 10–9 (53%) | — | -1.00 |
| 31 | 1995 | 1594 | 111.7 | -2.46 | -4.96 | 0.713 | 45.6% | +20 | — | — | 22.7% | -1.64 | 0–1 | 2–2 (50%) | — | +0.33 | 1991 | 1709 | 127.3 | -0.35 | -2.54 | 0.863 | 47.8% | +60 | +151 | — | 48.5% | -0.48 | 3–2 (60%) | 2–0 | — | -0.03 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1995 | 1686 | 117.0 | -0.18 | -0.05 | 0.814 | 46.1% | +61 | — | — | 25.0% | -1.38 | — | 1–1 | — | -0.54 |
| 36 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1996 | 1672 | 104.2 | -2.25 | +2.64 | 0.506 | 43.1% | — | — | — | 33.3% | -1.33 | 0–1 | — | — | -0.10 |
| Career | — | 1766 | 133.5 | -0.11 | -1.94 | 0.921 | 48.7% | +20 | -30 | -104 | 50.4% | -0.07 | 62–47 (57%) | 62–60 (51%) | 104.7 | +2.25 | — | 2199 | 161.2 | -0.42 | -1.70 | 0.835 | 47.2% | +9 | +121 | -314 | 64.2% | +0.93 | 138–68 (67%) | 139–119 (54%) | 101.7 | -2.00 |
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thomas Muster | 1 | 5 | 6 | Oct 15, 1994 | H2H |
| Horacio de la Pena | 3 | 3 | 6 | May 19, 1994 | H2H |
| Alberto Mancini | 3 | 3 | 6 | Oct 28, 1993 | H2H |
| Cassio Motta | 4 | 2 | 6 | Nov 9, 1990 | H2H |
| Mark Woodforde | 2 | 3 | 5 | May 14, 1994 | H2H |
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ivan Lendl | 6 | 10 | 16 | Jan 28, 1990 | H2H |
| Tomas Smid | 8 | 3 | 11 | May 14, 1988 | H2H |
| Mats Wilander | 5 | 6 | 11 | Mar 20, 1988 | H2H |
| Guy Forget | 7 | 2 | 9 | Feb 15, 1996 | H2H |
| Guillermo Vilas | 2 | 7 | 9 | May 11, 1986 | H2H |