H2H data updated: 2026-09-02 00:00 UTC

Lukas Rosol vs Ernests Gulbis H2H: 3-1

Lukas Rosol holds a 3–1 lead over Ernests Gulbis in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Lukas Rosol leads 2–1 on hard courts and 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Lukas Rosol won the 2015 Winston-Salem Open first round 6-4 7-6(4).

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Lukas Rosol
CZE Age 41 Right-Handed 193 cm / 6'4"
H2H
3 – 1
4 main draw meetings
Ernests Gulbis
LAT Age 38 Right-Handed 193 cm / 6'4"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Lukas Rosol #176 6-4 6-4 Ernests Gulbis #178 Match data Feb 3, 2020 Q1 Q Pune ATP 250 Hard
Lukas Rosol #86 6-4 7-6(4) Ernests Gulbis #67 Match data Aug 25, 2015* R64 Winston-Salem Open ATP 250 Hard
Ernests Gulbis #87 6-2 5-7 6-3 Lukas Rosol #63 Match data Aug 13, 2015* R32 Canadian Open Masters 1000 Hard
Lukas Rosol #41 7-6(2) 6-3 7-6(4) Ernests Gulbis #83 Match data Jul 1, 2015* R128 Wimbledon Grand Slam Grass
Lukas Rosol #78 6-3 6-4 Ernests Gulbis #51 Match data Oct 27, 2011* R32 St. Petersburg ATP 250 Hard

1 qualifying meeting shown in the table; qualifying is excluded from the H2H score. Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Lukas Rosol #1,777 #26 1,290 1,920 110 150 42.3% 0 0 0 0 2 2
Ernests Gulbis #893 #10 2,725 2,140 221 233 48.7% 0 0 0 0 6 6

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Lukas Rosol Ernests Gulbis
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 — — — — — — — 2006 3–1 75.0% #141 1,556 0 0
18 — — — — — — — 2007 6–14 30.0% #61 1,638 0 0
19 — — — — — — — 2008 22–21 51.2% #53 1,810 0 0
20 — — — — — — — 2009 17–26 39.5% #90 1,723 0 0
21 2007 0–1 0.0% #271 1,507 0 0 2010 29–20 59.2% #24 1,851 0 1
22 2008 1–2 33.3% #182 1,536 0 0 2011 18–22 45.0% #61 1,776 0 2
23 2009 0–1 0.0% #148 1,563 0 0 2012 12–17 41.4% #136 1,726 0 2
24 2010 0–2 0.0% #164 1,576 0 0 2013 32–18 64.0% #24 1,940 0 4
25 2011 5–13 27.8% #70 1,577 0 0 2014 41–21 66.1% #13 1,918 0 6
26 2012 17–18 48.6% #73 1,749 0 0 2015 11–24 31.4% #81 1,765 0 6
27 2013 21–25 45.7% #47 1,737 0 1 2016 7–14 33.3% #151 1,785 0 6
28 2014 28–26 51.9% #31 1,787 0 2 2017 6–8 42.9% #199 1,718 0 6
29 2015 19–28 40.4% #55 1,845 0 2 2018 9–6 60.0% #95 1,814 0 6
30 2016 14–23 37.8% #113 1,721 0 2 2019 6–17 26.1% #226 1,534 0 6
31 2017 2–3 40.0% #203 1,670 0 2 2020 2–2 50.0% #181 1,563 0 6
32 2018 2–2 50.0% #142 1,702 0 2 2021 0–2 0.0% #191 1,509 0 6
33 2019 1–3 25.0% #180 1,661 0 2 — — — — — — —
34 2020 0–1 0.0% #199 1,658 0 2 — — — — — — —
36 2022 0–2 0.0% #216 1,588 0 2 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Lukas Rosol Ernests Gulbis
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 — — — — — — — — — — — — 3 1 4 75.0%
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 3 4 7 42.9% 1 6 7 14.3% 0 3 3 0.0% 2 1 3 66.7%
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 13 14 27 48.1% 6 5 11 54.5% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — —
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 14 18 32 43.8% 2 6 8 25.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
21 2007 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2010 18 15 33 54.5% 11 5 16 68.8% — — — — — — — —
22 2008 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — 2011 15 16 31 48.4% 3 4 7 42.9% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
23 2009 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2012 6 9 15 40.0% 5 6 11 45.5% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
24 2010 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2013 21 9 30 70.0% 8 7 15 53.3% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — —
25 2011 2 8 10 20.0% 3 5 8 37.5% — — — — — — — — 2014 23 14 37 62.2% 17 5 22 77.3% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
26 2012 6 10 16 37.5% 7 6 13 53.8% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — 2015 7 14 21 33.3% 3 8 11 27.3% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
27 2013 14 17 31 45.2% 6 6 12 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 2016 2 7 9 22.2% 5 5 10 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
28 2014 10 15 25 40.0% 17 9 26 65.4% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 2017 1 4 5 20.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — —
29 2015 12 16 28 42.9% 6 9 15 40.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 2018 5 4 9 55.6% 1 1 2 50.0% 3 1 4 75.0% — — — —
30 2016 10 15 25 40.0% 4 6 10 40.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 2019 5 8 13 38.5% 1 6 7 14.3% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — —
31 2017 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 2020 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2018 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — 2021 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
33 2019 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2020 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2022 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 57 92 149 38.3% 45 45 90 50.0% 8 13 21 38.1% — — — — — 135 139 274 49.3% 66 68 134 49.3% 15 24 39 38.5% 5 2 7 71.4%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 258/260 of Lukas Rosol's and 453/454 of Ernests Gulbis's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Lukas Rosol Ernests Gulbis
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
17 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2006 4/4 8.0 2.0 63.8% 74.9% 44.3% 73.7% 42.7% 63.8% 35.2%
18 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2007 20/20 8.3 3.9 63.1% 74.8% 47.6% 71.0% 39.1% 64.7% 33.9%
19 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2008 42/43 9.8 4.2 60.0% 74.6% 50.2% 64.8% 39.0% 64.8% 36.8%
20 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2009 43/43 9.2 3.8 62.9% 71.8% 47.3% 56.4% 41.8% 62.9% 34.7%
21 2007 1/1 1.0 6.0 52.3% 62.2% 48.8% 66.7% 28.6% 55.8% 34.2% 2010 49/49 8.9 3.2 63.0% 76.3% 50.9% 62.7% 34.2% 67.0% 37.1%
22 2008 3/3 2.7 3.7 49.5% 69.2% 42.0% 41.0% 77.8% 55.6% 38.6% 2011 40/40 9.3 4.3 60.8% 73.9% 47.5% 57.1% 36.9% 63.6% 34.7%
23 2009 1/1 10.0 3.0 63.6% 74.3% 40.0% 66.7% 60.0% 61.8% 33.0% 2012 29/29 11.3 5.0 58.4% 75.6% 47.7% 54.4% 37.2% 63.9% 33.9%
24 2010 2/2 4.0 5.0 49.9% 70.6% 44.8% 77.8% 5.0% 57.9% 26.8% 2013 50/50 7.8 3.6 61.1% 77.2% 51.0% 64.8% 45.0% 66.9% 39.9%
25 2011 18/18 7.5 3.9 57.0% 68.7% 45.7% 63.3% 33.5% 59.0% 34.2% 2014 62/62 10.5 3.7 60.3% 78.5% 51.2% 62.0% 41.9% 67.6% 36.8%
26 2012 35/35 7.2 3.1 58.6% 74.4% 50.9% 63.0% 45.9% 64.7% 32.6% 2015 35/35 9.7 5.7 58.2% 74.7% 45.5% 63.1% 39.4% 62.2% 33.4%
27 2013 46/46 6.9 3.3 58.0% 71.9% 48.3% 61.9% 35.5% 62.0% 35.2% 2016 21/21 9.5 5.0 56.4% 73.3% 48.0% 61.3% 31.9% 62.0% 33.5%
28 2014 53/54 6.3 2.7 57.3% 71.5% 49.5% 55.0% 40.6% 62.0% 34.8% 2017 14/14 10.4 5.6 54.7% 76.8% 46.1% 61.5% 31.7% 63.1% 34.8%
29 2015 47/47 5.7 4.1 56.9% 72.2% 49.6% 52.8% 37.2% 62.3% 33.1% 2018 15/15 9.7 5.9 57.1% 76.3% 49.2% 62.0% 43.5% 64.6% 34.4%
30 2016 36/37 6.9 3.2 60.3% 71.1% 51.0% 64.2% 40.0% 63.0% 31.8% 2019 23/23 7.6 4.6 55.4% 73.3% 46.3% 51.5% 39.8% 61.2% 33.2%
31 2017 5/5 10.4 4.4 62.4% 80.1% 50.7% 51.4% 37.2% 68.0% 26.4% 2020 4/4 12.3 4.5 59.9% 74.9% 60.2% 74.7% 24.4% 68.9% 30.8%
32 2018 4/4 8.3 3.5 64.3% 71.7% 50.7% 70.4% 20.0% 64.3% 29.3% 2021 2/2 4.0 5.0 53.7% 73.7% 41.0% 27.8% — 59.2% 13.4%
33 2019 4/4 6.5 4.3 64.0% 68.8% 50.0% 48.2% 38.8% 62.0% 30.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
34 2020 1/1 3.0 4.0 38.1% 81.3% 53.8% 50.0% — 64.3% 20.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
36 2022 2/2 6.0 3.5 72.3% 65.1% 40.9% 47.8% 72.2% 57.7% 29.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 258/260 6.6 3.4 58.1% 71.9% 49.3% 58.9% 39.1% 62.4% 33.4% — 453/454 9.4 4.2 60.1% 75.4% 48.9% 61.2% 38.9% 64.7% 35.6%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Lukas Rosol Ernests Gulbis
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 1557 106.4 +0.61 -1.74 0.972 49.0% +9 — — 54.5% +0.09 3–0 (100%) 2–1 (67%) — +0.44
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 1638 127.1 +1.64 -1.59 0.958 49.8% +27 -146 -146 41.5% -0.21 0–3 (0%) 3–7 (30%) — -0.98
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 1810 149.1 +2.28 +0.51 1.045 50.8% -39 -165 -225 51.3% +0.16 8–9 (47%) 8–11 (42%) — -2.63
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 1723 144.0 -0.05 -0.80 0.937 49.0% +7 -100 -119 42.6% -0.38 5–9 (36%) 8–10 (44%) — -2.12
21 2007 1508 110.5 -1.57 +3.07 0.774 45.7% — — — 0.0% -2.00 — 0–1 — -0.23 2010 1851 159.8 +3.64 +1.63 1.123 51.4% -51 -37 — 58.1% +0.42 6–7 (46%) 12–9 (57%) — -0.88
22 2008 1536 106.6 -1.01 -0.08 0.870 47.4% — — — 42.9% -1.00 0–1 1–0 — +0.18 2011 1776 145.2 +0.75 -1.54 0.951 49.0% +9 -28 — 42.3% -0.40 8–4 (67%) 4–13 (24%) — -0.23
23 2009 1563 107.4 +0.04 -2.26 0.865 47.9% — — — 33.3% -1.00 0–1 0–1 — +0.02 2012 1726 133.5 +0.26 -1.91 0.941 48.9% +5 -29 -123 46.3% -0.29 5–8 (38%) 9–6 (60%) — -0.91
24 2010 1576 107.5 -1.31 -0.97 0.638 44.3% — — — 16.7% -2.00 0–1 — — -0.05 2013 1941 162.6 +3.27 +3.69 1.205 53.4% -4 -117 -220 60.3% +0.87 11–10 (52%) 13–10 (57%) — -3.49
25 2011 1577 125.6 -2.74 -2.58 0.833 47.0% 0 +90 — 33.3% -1.04 2–3 (40%) 4–8 (33%) — +0.09 2014 1918 165.6 +3.67 +1.09 1.137 52.1% -25 +186 -209 60.8% +0.75 13–3 (81%) 19–12 (61%) — -0.35
26 2012 1750 140.7 +2.12 -3.63 0.925 49.1% -109 -26 -70 46.1% -0.24 6–4 (60%) 7–13 (35%) — -1.04 2015 1766 142.0 -1.53 -1.16 0.884 48.0% +13 +125 -70 38.8% -0.65 5–8 (38%) 6–7 (46%) — +2.08
27 2013 1737 143.6 -0.85 -1.68 0.926 49.0% -16 -11 -87 48.3% -0.21 6–9 (40%) 6–9 (40%) — +1.39 2016 1786 137.9 -1.04 -1.59 0.883 47.8% -66 +115 — 36.5% -0.62 2–3 (40%) 2–6 (25%) — -0.62
28 2014 1788 149.9 -1.20 -0.94 0.916 48.7% -81 +76 -127 47.6% -0.40 8–6 (57%) 18–10 (64%) — -1.09 2017 1718 129.7 +0.08 -0.70 0.945 48.9% -62 +100 +21 43.6% -0.38 2–2 (50%) 2–4 (33%) — -0.03
29 2015 1846 149.4 -0.94 -1.88 0.879 48.2% -26 -21 -218 44.4% -0.39 8–10 (44%) 15–12 (56%) — -1.23 2018 1815 134.1 -0.05 -0.20 0.973 49.9% -54 — +57 52.1% +0.04 5–1 (83%) 3–4 (43%) — +0.38
30 2016 1722 143.9 -0.35 -3.49 0.860 47.9% +13 +53 — 40.2% -0.66 7–7 (50%) 12–9 (57%) — -1.96 2019 1535 124.6 -2.30 -2.09 0.855 47.1% +93 +104 +202 32.7% -1.18 1–4 (20%) 5–7 (42%) — +0.02
31 2017 1670 114.3 +0.43 -2.44 0.822 47.8% +16 — — 50.0% -0.07 1–1 2–1 (67%) — +0.08 2020 1563 122.8 -0.48 +0.51 0.992 50.6% +114 — — 53.8% +0.31 0–1 2–2 (50%) — -0.23
32 2018 1702 116.1 -0.71 -0.20 0.821 47.8% — — — 45.5% -0.55 2–1 (67%) 2–0 — -0.52 2021 1510 94.9 -2.66 -2.22 0.328 40.2% — — — 0.0% -2.75 — — — +0.24
33 2019 1661 113.9 -1.09 -2.40 0.789 46.4% +3 — — 38.5% -1.15 1–2 (33%) 2–1 (67%) — +0.37 2022 1483 103.6 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2020 1659 107.1 -0.51 +0.11 0.583 41.1% — — — 0.0% -3.50 — — — +0.30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2021 1546 101.4 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2022 1588 106.8 -2.09 -4.12 0.702 43.9% — — — 28.6% -1.43 0–1 1–1 — +0.05 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 2023 1540 92.2 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1920 139.1 -0.59 -2.12 0.886 48.3% -33 +29 -121 43.7% -0.49 41–47 (47%) 70–66 (51%) 103.0 -1.41 — 2141 151.4 +1.33 +0.06 1.009 50.1% -8 +11 -95 49.0% +0.01 74–72 (51%) 98–109 (47%) 99.7 -2.05

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.