H2H data updated: 2026-09-03 00:00 UTC

Lukas Rosol vs Gilles Muller H2H: 2-1

Lukas Rosol holds a 2–1 lead over Gilles Muller in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Lukas Rosol leads 1–0 on clay, while Gilles Muller leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Gilles Muller won the 2017 Wimbledon second round 7-5 6-7(7) 4-6 6-3 9-7.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Lukas Rosol
CZE Age 41 Right-Handed 193 cm / 6'4"
H2H
2 – 1
3 main draw meetings
Gilles Muller
LUX Age 43 Left-Handed 193 cm / 6'4"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Gilles Muller #26 7-5 6-7(7) 4-6 6-3 9-7 Lukas Rosol #214 Match data Jul 6, 2017* R64 Wimbledon Grand Slam Grass
Lukas Rosol #48 7-6(4) 6-2 Gilles Muller #68 Match data Apr 25, 2013* R32 Tiriac Open ATP 250 Clay
Lukas Rosol #64 7-5 6-4 Gilles Muller #67 Match data Mar 22, 2013* R128 Miami Open Masters 1000 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Lukas Rosol #1,777 #26 1,290 1,920 110 150 42.3% 0 0 0 0 2 2
Gilles Muller #966 #21 1,930 2,076 203 202 50.1% 0 0 0 0 2 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Lukas Rosol Gilles Muller
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
19 — — — — — — — 2002 0–1 0.0% #255 1,488 0 0
20 — — — — — — — 2003 0–1 0.0% #195 1,450 0 0
21 2007 0–1 0.0% #271 1,507 0 0 2004 10–8 55.6% #69 1,600 0 0
22 2008 1–2 33.3% #182 1,536 0 0 2005 20–21 48.8% #76 1,728 0 0
23 2009 0–1 0.0% #148 1,563 0 0 2006 11–20 35.5% #105 1,534 0 0
24 2010 0–2 0.0% #164 1,576 0 0 2007 2–3 40.0% #117 1,577 0 0
25 2011 5–13 27.8% #70 1,577 0 0 2008 5–6 45.5% #95 1,672 0 0
26 2012 17–18 48.6% #73 1,749 0 0 2009 5–9 35.7% #248 1,632 0 0
27 2013 21–25 45.7% #47 1,737 0 1 2010 2–2 50.0% #134 1,610 0 0
28 2014 28–26 51.9% #31 1,787 0 2 2011 14–11 56.0% #54 1,797 0 0
29 2015 19–28 40.4% #55 1,845 0 2 2012 21–21 50.0% #67 1,839 0 0
30 2016 14–23 37.8% #113 1,721 0 2 2013 2–8 20.0% #368 1,678 0 0
31 2017 2–3 40.0% #203 1,670 0 2 2014 4–6 40.0% #47 1,737 0 0
32 2018 2–2 50.0% #142 1,702 0 2 2015 31–24 56.4% #38 1,893 0 0
33 2019 1–3 25.0% #180 1,661 0 2 2016 35–24 59.3% #34 1,968 0 0
34 2020 0–1 0.0% #199 1,658 0 2 2017 32–18 64.0% #25 1,943 0 2
35 — — — — — — — 2018 9–19 32.1% #138 1,689 0 2
36 2022 0–2 0.0% #216 1,588 0 2 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Lukas Rosol Gilles Muller
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2002 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2003 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 2007 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2004 9 7 16 56.3% — — — — — — — — 1 1 2 50.0%
22 2008 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — 2005 12 11 23 52.2% 4 5 9 44.4% 3 3 6 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
23 2009 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 8 10 18 44.4% 3 5 8 37.5% 0 4 4 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
24 2010 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2007 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
25 2011 2 8 10 20.0% 3 5 8 37.5% — — — — — — — — 2008 5 4 9 55.6% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
26 2012 6 10 16 37.5% 7 6 13 53.8% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — 2009 4 5 9 44.4% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — —
27 2013 14 17 31 45.2% 6 6 12 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 2010 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
28 2014 10 15 25 40.0% 17 9 26 65.4% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 2011 12 10 22 54.5% — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% — — — —
29 2015 12 16 28 42.9% 6 9 15 40.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 2012 14 14 28 50.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 4 5 9 44.4% — — — —
30 2016 10 15 25 40.0% 4 6 10 40.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 2013 2 4 6 33.3% 0 4 4 0.0% — — — — — — — —
31 2017 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 2014 3 5 8 37.5% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
32 2018 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — 2015 23 18 41 56.1% 3 3 6 50.0% 5 3 8 62.5% — — — —
33 2019 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2016 22 17 39 56.4% 0 2 2 0.0% 13 5 18 72.2% — — — —
34 2020 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2017 16 12 28 57.1% 5 4 9 55.6% 11 2 13 84.6% — — — —
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2018 5 10 15 33.3% 1 4 5 20.0% 3 5 8 37.5% — — — —
36 2022 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 57 92 149 38.3% 45 45 90 50.0% 8 13 21 38.1% — — — — — 137 131 268 51.1% 19 30 49 38.8% 45 36 81 55.6% 2 5 7 28.6%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 258/260 of Lukas Rosol's and 397/405 of Gilles Muller's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Lukas Rosol Gilles Muller
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
19 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2002 1/1 13.0 3.0 60.4% 77.6% 38.6% 70.0% 25.0% 62.2% 34.3%
20 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2003 1/1 3.0 3.0 49.2% 56.7% 67.7% 33.3% 25.0% 62.3% 40.3%
21 2007 1/1 1.0 6.0 52.3% 62.2% 48.8% 66.7% 28.6% 55.8% 34.2% 2004 18/18 8.2 3.0 61.1% 70.3% 53.4% 48.8% 53.1% 63.5% 36.9%
22 2008 3/3 2.7 3.7 49.5% 69.2% 42.0% 41.0% 77.8% 55.6% 38.6% 2005 41/41 9.2 3.6 60.8% 73.4% 50.7% 64.0% 42.8% 64.5% 31.5%
23 2009 1/1 10.0 3.0 63.6% 74.3% 40.0% 66.7% 60.0% 61.8% 33.0% 2006 31/31 9.1 3.8 61.0% 72.5% 48.9% 64.2% 32.8% 63.0% 32.9%
24 2010 2/2 4.0 5.0 49.9% 70.6% 44.8% 77.8% 5.0% 57.9% 26.8% 2007 5/5 15.6 3.6 66.8% 72.1% 50.4% 56.1% 41.8% 64.9% 33.6%
25 2011 18/18 7.5 3.9 57.0% 68.7% 45.7% 63.3% 33.5% 59.0% 34.2% 2008 11/11 19.4 4.0 61.7% 77.1% 48.6% 69.2% 32.8% 66.0% 28.3%
26 2012 35/35 7.2 3.1 58.6% 74.4% 50.9% 63.0% 45.9% 64.7% 32.6% 2009 13/14 12.3 3.5 60.5% 74.5% 51.2% 57.7% 29.7% 65.5% 30.0%
27 2013 46/46 6.9 3.3 58.0% 71.9% 48.3% 61.9% 35.5% 62.0% 35.2% 2010 4/4 17.3 3.3 64.5% 81.3% 58.3% 50.0% 16.8% 72.8% 26.6%
28 2014 53/54 6.3 2.7 57.3% 71.5% 49.5% 55.0% 40.6% 62.0% 34.8% 2011 25/25 15.5 3.1 60.2% 80.0% 49.9% 63.1% 42.9% 68.4% 29.4%
29 2015 47/47 5.7 4.1 56.9% 72.2% 49.6% 52.8% 37.2% 62.3% 33.1% 2012 40/42 13.5 3.1 62.1% 81.2% 47.5% 64.0% 36.9% 68.6% 30.8%
30 2016 36/37 6.9 3.2 60.3% 71.1% 51.0% 64.2% 40.0% 63.0% 31.8% 2013 10/10 11.2 3.5 59.1% 73.6% 45.8% 58.0% 33.2% 62.3% 27.8%
31 2017 5/5 10.4 4.4 62.4% 80.1% 50.7% 51.4% 37.2% 68.0% 26.4% 2014 10/10 16.8 4.0 62.0% 76.4% 49.0% 49.3% 24.9% 66.4% 28.0%
32 2018 4/4 8.3 3.5 64.3% 71.7% 50.7% 70.4% 20.0% 64.3% 29.3% 2015 55/55 13.9 3.7 60.6% 79.6% 50.8% 69.0% 39.4% 68.4% 32.2%
33 2019 4/4 6.5 4.3 64.0% 68.8% 50.0% 48.2% 38.8% 62.0% 30.0% 2016 56/59 15.3 3.6 60.8% 82.1% 53.2% 61.4% 37.0% 70.6% 32.6%
34 2020 1/1 3.0 4.0 38.1% 81.3% 53.8% 50.0% — 64.3% 20.8% 2017 48/50 14.7 3.9 63.0% 80.1% 52.7% 70.9% 43.0% 69.6% 32.7%
35 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2018 28/28 15.0 4.8 61.4% 78.3% 47.3% 58.5% 28.4% 66.2% 31.1%
36 2022 2/2 6.0 3.5 72.3% 65.1% 40.9% 47.8% 72.2% 57.7% 29.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 258/260 6.6 3.4 58.1% 71.9% 49.3% 58.9% 39.1% 62.4% 33.4% — 397/405 13.4 3.6 61.3% 77.9% 50.6% 63.2% 37.8% 67.3% 31.7%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Lukas Rosol Gilles Muller
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2002 1488 100.0 -3.28 -2.21 0.908 49.0% — — — 33.3% -0.67 0–1 0–1 — +0.06
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2003 1451 96.0 +2.20 -4.69 1.068 50.0% — — — 0.0% -2.00 — — — 0.00
21 2007 1508 110.5 -1.57 +3.07 0.774 45.7% — — — 0.0% -2.00 — 0–1 — -0.23 2004 1600 126.5 +0.44 -0.24 1.013 50.1% +38 — — 44.2% -0.09 7–1 (88%) 1–6 (14%) — +0.52
22 2008 1536 106.6 -1.01 -0.08 0.870 47.4% — — — 42.9% -1.00 0–1 1–0 — +0.18 2005 1728 137.8 +2.01 -3.76 0.888 48.6% -9 -178 -152 44.8% -0.60 6–5 (55%) 13–6 (68%) — -2.15
23 2009 1563 107.4 +0.04 -2.26 0.865 47.9% — — — 33.3% -1.00 0–1 0–1 — +0.02 2006 1535 118.4 -0.34 -3.26 0.890 48.8% +78 -6 -43 36.1% -0.67 1–4 (20%) 5–9 (36%) — +1.32
24 2010 1576 107.5 -1.31 -0.97 0.638 44.3% — — — 16.7% -2.00 0–1 — — -0.05 2007 1578 104.7 +1.65 -2.99 0.958 49.5% -32 — — 30.8% -0.77 — 1–1 — +0.07
25 2011 1577 125.6 -2.74 -2.58 0.833 47.0% 0 +90 — 33.3% -1.04 2–3 (40%) 4–8 (33%) — +0.09 2008 1673 122.4 +2.48 -2.87 0.833 48.5% +20 — — 45.7% -0.34 2–2 (50%) 6–4 (60%) — +0.16
26 2012 1750 140.7 +2.12 -3.63 0.925 49.1% -109 -26 -70 46.1% -0.24 6–4 (60%) 7–13 (35%) — -1.04 2009 1632 120.3 +1.24 -3.51 0.868 48.1% +68 — -102 40.0% -0.63 1–2 (33%) 5–2 (71%) — +0.29
27 2013 1737 143.6 -0.85 -1.68 0.926 49.0% -16 -11 -87 48.3% -0.21 6–9 (40%) 6–9 (40%) — +1.39 2010 1610 114.3 -1.03 -2.96 0.979 49.2% — — — 50.0% -0.10 1–1 2–2 (50%) — +0.27
28 2014 1788 149.9 -1.20 -0.94 0.916 48.7% -81 +76 -127 47.6% -0.40 8–6 (57%) 18–10 (64%) — -1.09 2011 1798 145.1 +4.00 -3.93 0.931 49.6% 0 — -131 55.4% -0.09 2–5 (29%) 16–11 (59%) — -0.32
29 2015 1846 149.4 -0.94 -1.88 0.879 48.2% -26 -21 -218 44.4% -0.39 8–10 (44%) 15–12 (56%) — -1.23 2012 1840 148.8 +4.06 -4.34 0.979 49.8% +31 -246 -188 46.8% -0.15 10–7 (59%) 16–17 (48%) — -1.66
30 2016 1722 143.9 -0.35 -3.49 0.860 47.9% +13 +53 — 40.2% -0.66 7–7 (50%) 12–9 (57%) — -1.96 2013 1678 116.7 +0.08 -5.24 0.738 45.9% +82 -165 — 26.1% -1.22 1–2 (33%) 3–3 (50%) — -0.20
31 2017 1670 114.3 +0.43 -2.44 0.822 47.8% +16 — — 50.0% -0.07 1–1 2–1 (67%) — +0.08 2014 1738 140.5 +1.86 -1.97 0.832 47.2% +17 — — 44.4% -0.71 1–2 (33%) 5–3 (63%) — -0.77
32 2018 1702 116.1 -0.71 -0.20 0.821 47.8% — — — 45.5% -0.55 2–1 (67%) 2–0 — -0.52 2015 1894 162.5 +4.09 -2.33 1.019 50.8% -10 -311 -37 53.9% +0.26 11–8 (58%) 27–18 (60%) — -1.33
33 2019 1661 113.9 -1.09 -2.40 0.789 46.4% +3 — — 38.5% -1.15 1–2 (33%) 2–1 (67%) — +0.37 2016 1968 159.7 +6.13 -2.52 1.108 51.4% -18 — -20 55.2% +0.31 10–8 (56%) 24–21 (53%) — -1.98
34 2020 1659 107.1 -0.51 +0.11 0.583 41.1% — — — 0.0% -3.50 — — — +0.30 2017 1943 156.0 +4.71 -2.01 1.074 51.2% -84 -284 +133 59.7% +0.47 9–4 (69%) 19–10 (66%) — -0.32
35 2021 1546 101.4 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2018 1689 131.0 +1.83 -3.86 0.921 48.7% +16 -65 +271 39.0% -0.55 3–6 (33%) 9–10 (47%) — +1.28
36 2022 1588 106.8 -2.09 -4.12 0.702 43.9% — — — 28.6% -1.43 0–1 1–1 — +0.05 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 2023 1540 92.2 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1920 139.1 -0.59 -2.12 0.886 48.3% -33 +29 -121 43.7% -0.49 41–47 (47%) 70–66 (51%) 103.0 -1.41 — 2076 149.8 +3.16 -2.99 0.969 49.8% +3 -180 -5 48.3% -0.13 65–58 (53%) 152–124 (55%) 106.3 -1.18

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.