H2H data updated: 2026-09-01 00:00 UTC

Lukas Rosol vs Jerzy Janowicz H2H: 1-2

Jerzy Janowicz holds a 2–1 lead over Lukas Rosol in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Jerzy Janowicz leads 2–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Jerzy Janowicz won the 2015 Winston-Salem Open second round 6-3 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Lukas Rosol
CZE Age 41 Right-Handed 193 cm / 6'4"
H2H
1 – 2
3 main draw meetings
Jerzy Janowicz
POL Age 35 Right-Handed 203 cm / 6'8"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Jerzy Janowicz #61 6-3 6-2 Lukas Rosol #86 Match data Aug 26, 2015* R32 Winston-Salem Open ATP 250 Hard
Lukas Rosol #33 3-6 7-6(3) 7-5 Jerzy Janowicz #52 Match data Aug 23, 2014* F Winston-Salem Open ATP 250 Hard
Jerzy Janowicz #26 6-2 6-4 Lukas Rosol #65 Match data Feb 21, 2013* R32 Marseille ATP 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Lukas Rosol #1,777 #26 1,290 1,920 110 150 42.3% 0 0 0 0 2 2
Jerzy Janowicz #735 #14 2,154 1,962 80 85 48.5% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Lukas Rosol Jerzy Janowicz
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 — — — — — — — 2008 0–1 0.0% #339 1,495 0 0
18 — — — — — — — 2009 0–2 0.0% #319 1,575 0 0
19 — — — — — — — 2010 0–2 0.0% #161 1,572 0 0
20 — — — — — — — 2011 0–1 0.0% #221 1,547 0 0
21 2007 0–1 0.0% #271 1,507 0 0 2012 9–4 69.2% #26 1,834 0 0
22 2008 1–2 33.3% #182 1,536 0 0 2013 23–20 53.5% #21 1,912 0 0
23 2009 0–1 0.0% #148 1,563 0 0 2014 22–24 47.8% #43 1,849 0 0
24 2010 0–2 0.0% #164 1,576 0 0 2015 20–22 47.6% #57 1,789 0 0
25 2011 5–13 27.8% #70 1,577 0 0 2016 0–3 0.0% #280 1,768 0 0
26 2012 17–18 48.6% #73 1,749 0 0 2017 6–6 50.0% #123 1,740 0 0
27 2013 21–25 45.7% #47 1,737 0 1 — — — — — — —
28 2014 28–26 51.9% #31 1,787 0 2 — — — — — — —
29 2015 19–28 40.4% #55 1,845 0 2 — — — — — — —
30 2016 14–23 37.8% #113 1,721 0 2 — — — — — — —
31 2017 2–3 40.0% #203 1,670 0 2 — — — — — — —
32 2018 2–2 50.0% #142 1,702 0 2 — — — — — — —
33 2019 1–3 25.0% #180 1,661 0 2 — — — — — — —
34 2020 0–1 0.0% #199 1,658 0 2 — — — — — — —
36 2022 0–2 0.0% #216 1,588 0 2 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Lukas Rosol Jerzy Janowicz
Yr HardClayGrass Yr HardClayGrass
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — —
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2010 — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2011 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
21 2007 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2012 7 3 10 70.0% — — — — 2 1 3 66.7%
22 2008 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 2013 11 12 23 47.8% 7 6 13 53.8% 5 2 7 71.4%
23 2009 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2014 17 15 32 53.1% 3 7 10 30.0% 2 2 4 50.0%
24 2010 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2015 14 13 27 51.9% 3 6 9 33.3% 3 3 6 50.0%
25 2011 2 8 10 20.0% 3 5 8 37.5% — — — — 2016 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — —
26 2012 6 10 16 37.5% 7 6 13 53.8% 4 2 6 66.7% 2017 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 2 6 66.7%
27 2013 14 17 31 45.2% 6 6 12 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2014 10 15 25 40.0% 17 9 26 65.4% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2015 12 16 28 42.9% 6 9 15 40.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2016 10 15 25 40.0% 4 6 10 40.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2017 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2018 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2019 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2020 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2022 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 57 92 149 38.3% 45 45 90 50.0% 8 13 21 38.1% — 51 51 102 50.0% 13 24 37 35.1% 16 10 26 61.5%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 258/260 of Lukas Rosol's and 164/165 of Jerzy Janowicz's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Lukas Rosol Jerzy Janowicz
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
17 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2008 1/1 8.0 1.0 52.8% 68.4% 38.2% 42.9% 25.0% 54.2% 24.0%
18 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2009 2/2 11.5 1.5 56.4% 75.2% 54.2% 56.9% 44.3% 66.0% 33.4%
19 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2010 2/2 1.5 5.0 62.5% 67.3% 49.1% 51.7% 12.5% 60.5% 31.7%
20 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2011 1/1 8.0 8.0 67.9% 76.4% 47.1% 81.8% 50.0% 67.0% 25.3%
21 2007 1/1 1.0 6.0 52.3% 62.2% 48.8% 66.7% 28.6% 55.8% 34.2% 2012 13/13 12.3 3.6 62.3% 81.2% 59.3% 52.8% 44.2% 72.8% 34.2%
22 2008 3/3 2.7 3.7 49.5% 69.2% 42.0% 41.0% 77.8% 55.6% 38.6% 2013 43/43 10.7 5.3 60.7% 76.5% 51.2% 64.4% 40.9% 66.5% 34.6%
23 2009 1/1 10.0 3.0 63.6% 74.3% 40.0% 66.7% 60.0% 61.8% 33.0% 2014 46/46 8.6 6.7 59.5% 73.5% 47.6% 56.7% 40.5% 63.0% 33.8%
24 2010 2/2 4.0 5.0 49.9% 70.6% 44.8% 77.8% 5.0% 57.9% 26.8% 2015 42/42 9.3 4.5 65.7% 71.0% 47.0% 63.6% 36.7% 62.7% 33.8%
25 2011 18/18 7.5 3.9 57.0% 68.7% 45.7% 63.3% 33.5% 59.0% 34.2% 2016 2/3 7.5 8.5 59.0% 68.6% 46.8% 57.5% 16.7% 59.7% 23.4%
26 2012 35/35 7.2 3.1 58.6% 74.4% 50.9% 63.0% 45.9% 64.7% 32.6% 2017 12/12 9.8 3.8 62.0% 78.8% 52.3% 59.7% 35.4% 68.7% 27.9%
27 2013 46/46 6.9 3.3 58.0% 71.9% 48.3% 61.9% 35.5% 62.0% 35.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
28 2014 53/54 6.3 2.7 57.3% 71.5% 49.5% 55.0% 40.6% 62.0% 34.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
29 2015 47/47 5.7 4.1 56.9% 72.2% 49.6% 52.8% 37.2% 62.3% 33.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
30 2016 36/37 6.9 3.2 60.3% 71.1% 51.0% 64.2% 40.0% 63.0% 31.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
31 2017 5/5 10.4 4.4 62.4% 80.1% 50.7% 51.4% 37.2% 68.0% 26.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
32 2018 4/4 8.3 3.5 64.3% 71.7% 50.7% 70.4% 20.0% 64.3% 29.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
33 2019 4/4 6.5 4.3 64.0% 68.8% 50.0% 48.2% 38.8% 62.0% 30.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
34 2020 1/1 3.0 4.0 38.1% 81.3% 53.8% 50.0% — 64.3% 20.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
36 2022 2/2 6.0 3.5 72.3% 65.1% 40.9% 47.8% 72.2% 57.7% 29.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 258/260 6.6 3.4 58.1% 71.9% 49.3% 58.9% 39.1% 62.4% 33.4% — 164/165 9.6 5.2 61.8% 74.5% 49.7% 60.4% 38.9% 65.0% 33.4%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Lukas Rosol Jerzy Janowicz
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 1496 105.5 +3.34 -3.71 0.524 41.8% — — — 0.0% -2.50 — — — -0.19
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 1576 113.5 +1.45 -1.41 0.983 50.2% — — — 33.3% +0.17 0–2 0–2 — -0.07
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2010 1573 104.6 -0.36 -1.36 0.802 45.4% — — — 0.0% -2.50 — — — +0.16
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2011 1547 107.6 +0.31 -3.01 0.766 48.2% — — — 33.3% -0.67 0–1 0–1 — +0.18
21 2007 1508 110.5 -1.57 +3.07 0.774 45.7% — — — 0.0% -2.00 — 0–1 — -0.23 2012 1834 139.1 +6.45 -0.74 1.259 52.6% -53 — -71 60.0% +0.46 2–1 (67%) 5–3 (63%) — +0.87
22 2008 1536 106.6 -1.01 -0.08 0.870 47.4% — — — 42.9% -1.00 0–1 1–0 — +0.18 2013 1912 158.2 +3.46 -0.94 1.034 50.5% -106 -126 +8 54.4% +0.11 7–8 (47%) 15–11 (58%) — -0.48
23 2009 1563 107.4 +0.04 -2.26 0.865 47.9% — — — 33.3% -1.00 0–1 0–1 — +0.02 2014 1849 151.0 -0.28 -1.76 0.915 48.7% +3 -103 +58 48.0% -0.30 10–8 (56%) 13–11 (54%) — +0.19
24 2010 1576 107.5 -1.31 -0.97 0.638 44.3% — — — 16.7% -2.00 0–1 — — -0.05 2015 1790 145.4 -0.74 -1.43 0.907 48.4% +32 -73 +74 46.8% -0.18 9–7 (56%) 9–14 (39%) — +0.89
25 2011 1577 125.6 -2.74 -2.58 0.833 47.0% 0 +90 — 33.3% -1.04 2–3 (40%) 4–8 (33%) — +0.09 2016 1769 132.5 -0.92 +4.11 0.579 42.5% +25 — — 20.0% -2.10 0–1 0–2 — -0.86
26 2012 1750 140.7 +2.12 -3.63 0.925 49.1% -109 -26 -70 46.1% -0.24 6–4 (60%) 7–13 (35%) — -1.04 2017 1741 123.1 +3.55 -3.32 0.892 48.8% +37 — +77 47.2% -0.33 2–2 (50%) 4–3 (57%) — -0.91
27 2013 1737 143.6 -0.85 -1.68 0.926 49.0% -16 -11 -87 48.3% -0.21 6–9 (40%) 6–9 (40%) — +1.39 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2014 1788 149.9 -1.20 -0.94 0.916 48.7% -81 +76 -127 47.6% -0.40 8–6 (57%) 18–10 (64%) — -1.09 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2015 1846 149.4 -0.94 -1.88 0.879 48.2% -26 -21 -218 44.4% -0.39 8–10 (44%) 15–12 (56%) — -1.23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2016 1722 143.9 -0.35 -3.49 0.860 47.9% +13 +53 — 40.2% -0.66 7–7 (50%) 12–9 (57%) — -1.96 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2017 1670 114.3 +0.43 -2.44 0.822 47.8% +16 — — 50.0% -0.07 1–1 2–1 (67%) — +0.08 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2018 1702 116.1 -0.71 -0.20 0.821 47.8% — — — 45.5% -0.55 2–1 (67%) 2–0 — -0.52 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2019 1661 113.9 -1.09 -2.40 0.789 46.4% +3 — — 38.5% -1.15 1–2 (33%) 2–1 (67%) — +0.37 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2020 1659 107.1 -0.51 +0.11 0.583 41.1% — — — 0.0% -3.50 — — — +0.30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2021 1546 101.4 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2022 1588 106.8 -2.09 -4.12 0.702 43.9% — — — 28.6% -1.43 0–1 1–1 — +0.05 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 2023 1540 92.2 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1920 139.1 -0.59 -2.12 0.886 48.3% -33 +29 -121 43.7% -0.49 41–47 (47%) 70–66 (51%) 103.0 -1.41 — 1962 147.6 +1.43 -1.43 0.953 49.3% -17 -104 +38 48.7% -0.17 30–30 (50%) 46–47 (49%) 103.8 -0.13

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.