H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC
Lukas Rosol vs Julian Reister H2H: 1-1
Lukas Rosol and Julian Reister are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Lukas Rosol leads 1–0 on clay, while Julian Reister leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Lukas Rosol won the 2014 Hamburg second round 6-4 2-1 RET.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CZE
Age 40
Right-Handed
193 cm / 6'4"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
GER
Age 40
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 16, 2014* | Hamburg | ATP 500 | R64 | Clay | Lukas Rosol | 6-4 2-1 (ret.) | Julian Reister | Match data |
| Jun 26, 2013* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R128 | Grass | Julian Reister | 6-3 4-6 7-6(5) 6-7(4) 6-4 | Lukas Rosol | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lukas Rosol | #1,777 | #26 | 1,290 | 1,921 | 110 | 148 | 42.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Julian Reister | #1,197 | #83 | 612 | 1,748 | 14 | 34 | 29.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Lukas Rosol | Julian Reister | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #327 | 1,487 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2007 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #271 | 1,507 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #307 | 1,500 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2008 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #182 | 1,535 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2009 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #148 | 1,562 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2010 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #164 | 1,575 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #114 | 1,647 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2011 | 5–13 | 27.8% | #70 | 1,576 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #231 | 1,599 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2012 | 17–18 | 48.6% | #73 | 1,748 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #296 | 1,648 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2013 | 21–24 | 46.7% | #47 | 1,742 | 0 | 1 | 2013 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #86 | 1,692 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2014 | 28–26 | 51.9% | #31 | 1,798 | 0 | 2 | 2014 | 1–10 | 9.1% | #184 | 1,582 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2015 | 19–28 | 40.4% | #55 | 1,846 | 0 | 2 | 2015 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #563 | 1,649 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2016 | 14–22 | 38.9% | #113 | 1,726 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2017 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #203 | 1,671 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2018 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #142 | 1,703 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2019 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #180 | 1,660 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 2020 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #199 | 1,658 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 36 | 2022 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #216 | 1,588 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |