H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Lukas Rosol vs Lukasz Kubot H2H: 2-1
Lukas Rosol holds a 2–1 lead over Lukasz Kubot in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts, while Lukas Rosol leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Lukas Rosol won the 2013 Bangkok third round 6-3 3-6 7-6(2).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CZE
Age 40
Right-Handed
193 cm / 6'4"
H2H
2
–
1
3 main draw meetings
POL
Right-Handed
191 cm / 6'3"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 26, 2013* | Bangkok | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Lukas Rosol | 6-3 3-6 7-6(2) | Lukasz Kubot | Match data |
| May 3, 2012* | Belgrade | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Lukas Rosol | 7-5 6-2 | Lukasz Kubot | Match data |
| Sep 29, 2011* | Kuala Lumpur | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Lukasz Kubot | 6-3 6-3 | Lukas Rosol | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lukas Rosol | #1,777 | #26 | 1,290 | 1,921 | 110 | 148 | 42.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Lukasz Kubot | #1,054 | #41 | 977 | 1,870 | 82 | 118 | 41.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Lukas Rosol | Lukasz Kubot | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2007 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #271 | 1,507 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #219 | 1,514 | 0 | 0 |
| 2008 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #182 | 1,535 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #142 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 |
| 2009 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #148 | 1,562 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #125 | 1,552 | 0 | 0 |
| 2010 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #164 | 1,575 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #222 | 1,486 | 0 | 0 |
| 2011 | 5–13 | 27.8% | #70 | 1,576 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 9–9 | 50.0% | #101 | 1,730 | 0 | 0 |
| 2012 | 17–18 | 48.6% | #73 | 1,748 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 15–24 | 38.5% | #70 | 1,661 | 0 | 0 |
| 2013 | 21–24 | 46.7% | #47 | 1,742 | 0 | 1 | 2011 | 17–17 | 50.0% | #57 | 1,818 | 0 | 0 |
| 2014 | 28–26 | 51.9% | #31 | 1,798 | 0 | 2 | 2012 | 21–26 | 44.7% | #74 | 1,721 | 0 | 0 |
| 2015 | 19–28 | 40.4% | #55 | 1,846 | 0 | 2 | 2013 | 10–16 | 38.5% | #72 | 1,674 | 0 | 0 |
| 2016 | 14–22 | 38.9% | #113 | 1,726 | 0 | 2 | 2014 | 5–12 | 29.4% | #170 | 1,673 | 0 | 0 |
| 2017 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #203 | 1,671 | 0 | 2 | 2015 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #471 | 1,700 | 0 | 0 |
| 2018 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #142 | 1,703 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2019 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #180 | 1,660 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2020 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #199 | 1,658 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2022 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #216 | 1,588 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |